I may be remembering incorrectly, but to the best of my recollection, Ezio hasn't defeated anybody who, by your definition, wasn't also fodder due to having no feats.
So we're back to square one, neither Ezio nor Altair has defeated anybody who wasn't fodder, so it comes down to who has defeated the most impressive fodder.
In that case Altair has defeated more enemies, without being injured, with lesser equipment and at one point with a lower physical capability than anything Ezio has done.
Ezio has defeated Mario (granted it was training) who has displayed his knowledge and combative capabilities on panel. Ezio has also defeated Cesare who was skilled enough to slay two soldiers at the same time handily.
Altair has never fought a skilled combatant, he has only fought quantities of fodder. Ezio, on the other hand, has fought and beaten combatants who've tested him in combat, his fighting style is also way more unorthodox, which begets the following: Altair has no armour, durability or pain tolerance showings to suggest he could outlast Ezio (who has armour and several showings of impressive pain tolerance) in combat. Thus, I have come to the conclusion that while it'll be an entertaining and brutal fight, Ezio wins by simply being more resilient.
Showings accounted for and compared.
Knowledge and logic applied.
Abbas is skilled and was shocked when Altair did something that Abbas considered impossible.
Altair never beat him.
It proves Moloch isn't fodder which disproves your claim.
Moloch was also slow and unskilled.
Robert is the only person to damage Altair throughout all his games. It's a better feat than your nonexistent Mario speculation. This is another example of your double standards.
Doesn't take skill to parry a not-so-subtle charging assassin. Ezio did the same exact thing to Cesare and Cesare caught him. Difference is, Cesare was overpowered.
Now where's your proof that Ezio can accomplish anything comparable to Altair's combat feats?
Ezio doesn't need feats comparable to Altair, facts can't argue with logic under these circumstances.
Altair beat Moloch who isn't fodder. Robert de Sable is not fodder either.
They are because they have no feats.
Do you know what literally means?
Yes. You said "Ok then" and literally went off topic. Look:
Ok then we also have the Genghis Khan feat where you ignore how Altair is the age as Ezio was when he was dying of Old Age. Oh and ignoring how I already pointed out it was noncanon in previous topics.
You can keep bringing those quotes and GIFs up all you want. It honestly makes you look all the more ignorant, salty and desperate. Plus, it doesn't take away the fact that you're a bad debater with no credentials :)