Magethor

@MonsterStomp said:

@spider-man 2996 said:

What time of duel? Gun or sword? :)

Tell him sword, but bring a gun.

No, tell him to bring a gun and call the cops.

They are both based of the same, but one of them came 700 years after the other because it wanted to make changes.

@PrinceAragorn1 said:

@Magethor said:

@PrinceAragorn1 said:

I may have missed your point, sorry.

Yet the logic seems a bit odd to me. We breed the cattle, and we eat them. It's true that we increase their numbers by specially breeding them, but then we eat them and decrease it again. It's like adding five dollars to a bag and taking it back. Nearly no contribution. Also, not like they are not able to survive on their own, there are millions of species useless to humans out there. We're helping them preserve their species does not justify our eating them in any manner.

All that aside, if some advanced aliens come and try to eat you, and say that you being food for us is good for your race, will you comply? It will still be cruel to the given individual, right?

Not to butt in guys, but did you know that out of 7 Billion human beings, there are only 1 Billion cattle?

No problem, jump in any time, not like we're in a duel or something, just discussing lightly :)

I didn't know about the number of cattles, but what are you pointing out?

Well I over read some of the stuff you guys were talking about about eating cattle and then breeding them... But, I jumped in because the breeding rate of these cattle is much slower than some observers think. When a calf is born, for example, it is not ready to eat yet... The breeders would have to wait until the cow is fully developed and this takes some time by the years. But, because of that, we are only able to maintain 1 Billion of them world wide. Notice I said cattle though. That doesn't include the entire livestock. But even all the livestock doesn't equal nearly to 7 Billion. (Not unless you count chickens). I guess the point here is that if all the humans in the Earth decided to eat one cow in a single day, all cows would not exist any more, and that's a scary thought.

If aliens did exist in a planet of NGC 1365 and had powerful telescopes. In our time line... If they used they're telescope to observe Earth, they will not see us on Earth, but they would be seeing the dinosaurs instead. That's because of the Light-Year delay.

@PrinceAragorn1 said:

@mrdecepticonleader said:

@PrinceAragorn1 said:

@mrdecepticonleader said:

We actually don't know what is the best/most natural diet for humans.

I have big problems with vegetarianism.I mean people say it is cruel to eat animals but it would be alot more cruel to just let animals become extinct would it not? We breed cattle and animals we eat and they stay alive and don't become extinct because we have a use for them.

Life eats life.

Er.. by eating animals, you're not helping them survive.. how do the animals you eat stay alive? lol

And you still have uses for most of the animals, you get milk, and fine class wool.. and stuff..

Did you not read my post properly?

I will re post the part you forgot to read/acknowledge.

"We breed cattle and animals we eat and they stay alive and don't become extinct because we have a use for them."

I respect a persons right to be a vegetarian that's fine with me but when people use the cruelty argument I have to point that factor out.

One of the reasons animals like tigers are endangered is because we don't breed then continuously really because we don't eat them animals such as cows,chickens,sheep etc will not go extinct as long as we carry on eating them.

I may have missed your point, sorry.

Yet the logic seems a bit odd to me. We breed the cattle, and we eat them. It's true that we increase their numbers by specially breeding them, but then we eat them and decrease it again. It's like adding five dollars to a bag and taking it back. Nearly no contribution. Also, not like they are not able to survive on their own, there are millions of species useless to humans out there. We're helping them preserve their species does not justify our eating them in any manner.

All that aside, if some advanced aliens come and try to eat you, and say that you being food for us is good for your race, will you comply? It will still be cruel to the given individual, right?

Not to butt in guys, but did you know that out of 7 Billion human beings, there are only 1 Billion cattle?

I just recently read this article about a supermassive black hole. The article states that it just recently discovered a superassive black hole in our next door neighbor galaxy. However, what you see it not in real-time. Or whatever the scientist see in their telescopes is not happening in real-time, but it is happening in the past. Yes, you heard right. These things that we view outside of our sphere of observation (Earth) is not happening in the real-time of our time. In our perspective, what we see is real-time events, however, the things we observe are always happening before our eyes or other 4 senses register them. For example, did you know that when you look at the sun, you are really seeing the light that was already projected 8 minutes before you look up in the sky and at the sun? Yes. the distance between our sun and the Earth causes a delay in what we sense in real-time. For example, if we are looking up into the sky at the sun, and that sun went Super Nova and exploded.... Our eyes will only see the sun at it always looked like. 8 minutes later our senses wouldn't even pick up the realization that the sun exploded because by the time of the 8th minute, we would already be dead.

This is the same thing with us observing other galaxies.

So when we see other galaxies that are 60 million light years away from us, we are actually viewing that galaxy's past by a few 10 million years!

I remember that black holes don't spin. Neutron Stars spin. Black Hole's pulls light in via its gravity, but since light moves in an omni direction, the gravity of the black hole sucks in that light, pulling it in one direction. So that would mean that the light is the one that is spinning or spiraling down into the black hole.... Therefore, the spinning is as fast as light (or faster), not "near the speed of light".

I remember that black holes don't spin. Neutron Stars spin. Black Hole's pulls light in via its gravity, but since light moves in an omni direction, the gravity of the black hole sucks in that light, pulling it in one direction. So that would mean that the light is the one that is spinning or spiraling down into the black hole.... Therefore, the spinning is as fast as light (or faster), not "near the speed of light".

I remember that black holes don't spin. Neutron Stars spin. Black Hole's pulls light in via its gravity, but since light moves in an omni direction, the gravity of the black hole sucks in that light, pulling it in one direction. So that would mean that the light is the one that is spinning or spiraling down into the black hole.... Therefore, the spinning is as fast as light (or faster), not "near the speed of light".

@ShootingNova said:

@Magethor said:

He was the Scientist Supreme.

Hank Pym?

No, it was the Scientist Supreme before Pym. Or maybe there 1st scientist supreme, but he had a weird name which I am having a hard time remembering.