Now that the randomness is out the way, thanks to the cool cats of Comicvine who make this a fine place to come to in order to vent on too many events, who wins against who and why MOS is one of the most divisive topics on the entire boards. Here's to 20,000 more folks!
Hey there fellow Viners, me and @squalleon are back for another blog on a subject and character close to both our hearts. After his disappointing results on August's Character of The Month polls, coming in at 9% and second last to Cyborg, it seems apparent more than ever that Superman doesn't have the best rep on the Vine. He may be the most iconic of superheroes but having an iconic status doesn't equal popularity obviously. There are many misconceptions, unfair criticisms and flat out incorrect assessments of the first, original template for superheroes that is Superman. On this blog, we intend to show why Superman has been a compelling, complex and intriguing character in a fitting world for over 75 years now.
1. Why Superman matters.
Sq: He is one of the most popular characters in any medium. The personification of humanity's highest values, a champion of truth and justice and the ultimate male power fantasy. The countless elseworlds, homages, pastiches and plain old rip-offs that spawn by the months show that people still want to read about Superman. He is the unstoppable force and the immovable object, because of his unbreakable will, unshaken ethical code and unlimited power. A character that is deep and simple at the same time. Providing the reader countless questions about how a being like that would act and think. Why does he do what he does? Can he exist? How much would he change the social and political structure? And when does his mission stops before he becames a threat? Superman has reached the stage that he isn't just another character in tights but THE Super-hero, one whose only equals are the heroes of myth and legend.
Lv: Nice job Squalleon, now I have to match that awesome treatise. (clears throat) In light of the world of 1938 where the Depression hung like a black cloud over the working class citizens of America, two Jewish boys with a dream created a character that would fight back against corrupt landlords, greedy criminals and sleazy politicians for the rights of the common man. That character was the hero recognised as the iconic and legendary paragon of moral virtue and upstanding humanitarian goodness that we call Superman. The character has been through many shifts and interpretations; from the rough vigilante of the Golden Age to the family friendly but overpowered Silver Age incarnation to the modern version with determination and guts in his Clark Kent persona whilst also possessing an unbreakable moral compass and adhering to the highest virtues. That strength of character and of morality is something that, for some makes Superman too much of a goody goody boy scout. To those that actually take the time to learn about Superman, they know that Superman's morality makes him both a simple character with plenty to love about him whilst also allowing for deep, thoughtful if not philosophical stories to be told. How would an alien god on Earth with powers and abilities far beyond those of mortal men be treated? What would the people's reaction be? How would governments react to him? Does he have the right to do what he does? These and many more questions also raised by my partner make Superman the head of the modern day superhero mythology. That's something I think we both agree on.
2. He is as "Super" as he is a "Man"
Sq: Many think Superman is unrelatable but how can that be? He is constantly burdened by the destruction of Krypton the planet he will never be able to live in or see with his own eyes. He feels like an outsider, doing good not only because of his kind heart but because he wants to be accepted, to stop feeling like an alien in another world and even when he is the most respected man of that world he still feels a hole inside his heart because he deep down knows he will never truly be a kryptonian or a human, destined to be an outcast everywhere and forever. He has to give up personal relationships for his duty. He always has to choose between what is right and what is legal. More importantly he wants to have a family, a normal family but he knows he can't, he can't have a child with the woman he loves and even if he could he can't bring a child to that lifestyle because he is afraid to expose it to the dangers lurking out there(like every parent in the real world). He can't have a happy ending as long as the never ending fight is happening. Many stories touch those subjects and show why Superman is more complex than people think.
Lv: There are those that think Superman is too "Super" to be considered much of a real "Man." But I fail to see how that can be the case. He's grown up on a farm, had to work hard doing his chores on the farm and in controlling and growing his strange powers and abilities. Clark has often felt alone and outcast despite his upbringing from the Kents making him act just as human as any other human being. But that dichotomy of calling Earth home yet never truly belonging there is what makes Superman so compelling. He acts as much of a man as any human does yet his superhuman abilities and alien heritage are a constant reminder that no matter how many human values he adheres to, he will never be one of them. To round this off, I'll use the constant example that Batman is supposed to be more relatable than Superman. Batman is a psychologically tortured, practically has an obsessive disorder with expunging crime and protecting the innocent, is a billionaire playboy in his secret identity and spends every night fighting crime in Gotham sending fear into the hearts of criminals. If we take out Superman's alien heritage and powers and compare their personalities, who sounds more relatable? The guy raised on a farm with a strong work ethic and moral compass to use his gifts and abilities to better himself and to help others? Or the guy who dresses like a bat every night to scare criminals non stop?
3. What exactly does OP mean?
Sq: Ok, lets be clear, what exactly does OP mean? Does it mean he can't be beaten by low-mid tiers and street levelers? GOOD because he isn't meant to fight them. Superman's enemies are either world-threatening, having the power, smarts or technology to counter Superman's incredible powerset or challenge his morals, will and heart. And in a world were genius phychopaths, monsters, demon overlords and alien emperors exist Superman WON'T have a problem to find a threat. Plus why are people always complaining about Superman and not Martian Manhunter,Captain Atom, Shazam, Silver Surfur or The Flash, heroes that are either on par or MORE powerful than Supes. The answer is because they want an excuse to hate Supes,even when thats not a good one.
Lv: I agree my friend, this is exactly the kind of criticism that is a real urban myth as to why Superman is not as popular as he should be. The overpowered claim is rooted in the Silver Age when, admittedly, Superman was vastly overpowered and was basically God for lack of a better term. But the modern version of Superman has been nowhere near this level of power for ages yet people still complain when he moves planets or tanks a supernova. This is the power level Superman is supposed to be written at, he's been a powerhouse character for many years now. The trick is not to make him Silver Age levels of OP whilst also showing Superman as a mighty being. Consequently, the counter to this point is "But that means there aren't powerful enough threats for Superman to face." That's a misconception of the threats and dangers Superman faces on a regular basis. In his regular rogues gallery, there's the tyrannical alien overlord Mongul who is usually strong enough to give Superman major trouble in a fight. There's Parasite, a power drainer who can take Superman's powers and use them against him. There's Hank Henshaw, a deranged technopath with Kryptonian and technological abilities surpassing Superman's own. And there's Lex Luthor who is not Superman's most powerful foe but tests Superman's physical might with his near unparalleled genius and vast resources. This doesn't even cover the JLA/other foes that are definitely more powerful than Superman in a pinch. Despero, Darkseid, Amazo, Doctor Destiny, Shaggy Man, Doomsday, the list goes on and on. So if people really think Superman is overpowered in a universe teeming with vastly more powerful beings, that's their misconception to make.
4.Superman's villains are awesome.
Of course, a hero can only be good as his villains and whilst they're often underrated, Superman's rogues galleries are among the most compelling and threatening antagonists in the comic book business.
Lex Luthor: None are known more widely than Superman's arch nemesis, human antithesis and ultimate rival that is Lex Luthor. Lex is a self made man, someone who has clawed his way to the top of the food chain by any means necessary and was living the high life as Metropolis' so called favourite son, despite his amoral and unscrupulous nature. But all that changed when Superman arrived on the scene. Everything Lex can do and all the property he owns seems to pale in comparison to the ultimate man from the heavens. Someone who Lex feels is a parasite leeching from humanity and depriving them of the will to act on their own accord. If Superman represents the best of humanity, Lex represents our worst demons and vices. Lex has deluded himself into thinking his obsessive crusade against Superman is justifiable instead of using his mind for more worthwhile purposes. This is because he feels it’s more important to focus his efforts on wiping out humanity’s apparent false idolisation of Superman. But outside of the tussel between Superman's brawn and Lex's brain and vast resources, this polar opposite dynamic is at the heart of their antagonism. Lex is driven by sheer ambition and hatred of Superman and endeavours to transcend beyond humanity’s limitations. In contrast, Superman lives his life according to a moral code instilled in him by physically and intellectually inferior beings. Lex wants to be more than a man whereas Superman wants to be less of an alien outcast. Such a dichotomy makes their clashes all the more intriguing.
General Zod: Outside of Lex Luthor, Superman's next biggest foe is the ruthless General Zod. A former Kryptonian General turned rebel outlaw, General Zod was banished to the Phantom Zone for his treacherous crimes against Krypton. At least, this is the mainly accepted version of his origin thanks to Superman II which was also maintained in Pre New 52 and Post New 52 comics to some degree. Just like Luthor represents the worst of humanity to contrast Superman's best of humanity, General Zod stands as the worst that Superman's home planet of Krypton has to offer. Though there have been several versions of Zod in the comics; the Pocket Universe Zod that was killed by Superman or the strange Phantom Zone Zod that showed up in For Tomorrow, the most recognisable version can be found in the Last Son storyline by Geoff Johns and Richard Donner. Although that version first started off as the obvious villain with plans to take over the Earth with Phantom Zone criminals, Zod has been developed as a more sympathetic figure, particularly in Superman: World of New Krypton where Zod's motives and drives are explored further. Though Zod is a meglomaniac despot in power, he does hold the interests of his fellow Kryptonians first. It's why he rebelled on Krypton and, in last year's Man of Steel, it's why he wanted to terra-form the Earth so that his people could survive. This version of Zod is obviously the best way to depict the character, one who is a clear antagonist with powers equal to Superman's under the light of a yellow sun but also with understandable, if not appreciable motives at the heart of his actions.
Brainiac: Another excellent Superman villain for me anyway is Brainiac. A Coluan with a 12th level intellect, Brainiac scours the universe in search of planets and shrinks one of its cities to add to his collection of captured worlds. What really makes Brainiac work is his cold, apathetic and detached mindset from everything but his task of collecting more bottled worlds to add to his knowledge, technology and power. Brainiac is basically the worst of alienkind, our greatest fears and worries about the dangers of other extraterrestrial lifeforms rounded up into an alien cybernetic package. He's a villain I've always wanted to see appear in a Superman film, and no Superman III does not count just because the original villain was meant to be Brainiac :P He can pose a physical, psychological and ideological challenge to Superman all at once and when treated right, it's clear to see why Brainiac is one of Superman's greatest villains.
Mr. Mxyzptlk: Probably the most powerful of Superman's rogues is Mr. Mxyzptlk. His origin is usually very simple, he is just an immortal imp from the 5th dimension("just" hah?), seeking amusement, he often challenges the Man of Steel, who he finds interesting. He is more of a prankster rather than an enemy and he has found himself helping Superman or even giving him life lessons without any gain. But his new 52 origin is quite different. Mxy was an adventurer of the 5th dimension, who learned that the king was sad and no one could make him smile. Mxy managed to make him happy by pulling a universe out of his hat, tricking heroes from around that world, the king's and Mxy's favorite trick was Superman, the only one who outsmarted Mxy every time.
Parasite: Another dangerous foe is The Parasite. A slave to his natural needs, no matter how many people absorbed the life force from, Parasite couldn't satisfy his hunger. Then Superman came along an almost endless source of energy, when the two came into contact Parasite grew stronger and bigger than before. Parasite hunts Superman to satisfy his eternal hunger. His origins are almost never the same but usually end up with him being dosed with chemicals, which made him the always hungry monster.
Bizarro: The loveable monster of Superman's rogues, he is part humor, part confusion. Depending on his origin Bizzaro is a twisted copy of Superman or an alien from Bizarro world a planet similar to earth but backwards. He does everything Superman does just backwards, usually he speaks in broken sentences and he says the opposite of what he means. He is often created by Lex Luthor and his current New 52 origin is another one of those. Bizarro appeared in Forever Evil where he had some of the most hilarious and emotional scenes of the New 52 along with Lex. His powers are always a twisted version of Superman's like Flame breath and Freeze rays.
5.Superman's supporting cast is awesome too.
Lois Lane: Fellow reporter at The Daily Planet, Lois Lane has been many things to Clark Kent over her 75 year history. Reporting partner, friend, lover and eventually wife to the visitor from another planet. Lois is a constant throughout Superman's many interpretations, Elsewords and alternate versions of the character as a representation of what Superman loves about humanity. Now I know some Superman fans and people on here aren't a huge fan of her but there is a reason Lois is a mainstay in the Superman franchise. She might not make Superman more human, a popular belief amongst Clois shippers that annoys those not so fond of the pair but Lois' personality represents a lot of what Superman loves about humanity. Determined, passionate, gutsy, capable yet caring and compassionate as well, Lois is a resourceful role model for women and an ideal contrast to Clark's personality.
Pa and Ma Kent: If ever there were parents who deserved the Parent of The Year award, Jonathan and Martha Kent fit the bill perfectly. It was them who discovered baby Kal-El's rocket in a Kansas cornfield and, rather than hand the strange space baby over to the government, the Kents took the child in and raised him as if he were their own. From then on, Clark Kent was raised by ordinary humans who instilled a strong work ethos and an upstanding moral compass into their upbringing of young Clark. They helped him control his abilities, gave him guidance on who Clark was and where he was from, advised him about what he should do with his abilities to make the world a better place and most importantly, gave much parental love and emotion to Clark Kent. It was the Kents who shaped Clark into becoming not just a man, but a Super-Man. And regardless of whether they live or die (RIP Jonathan and Martha Kent) their role in making Superman cannot be underestimated.
Jor-El and Lara Lor-Van: The desperate scientists of a doomed planet. They are two of the most inspiring and tragic figures in Superman's lore. With their planet destined to die, Jor-El and Lara had to take the ultimate risk of sending their child to earth, dying without knowing their son's fate. That part can be quite metaphorical, as it is a passing, sending your child to face the world alone. Jor-El was one of the most respected scientists of planet Krypton, often called the greatest, Jor-El was the youngest kryptonian to be part of the scientists council in some versions. He is one of only two people to actually repel the multitude(the other being Kal-El), he is the one who discovered and utilized the parallel plane of existence called Tha Phantom Zone He first found out that Krypton was dying but no one from the Kryptonian council believed him. Lara Lor-Van is Kal-El's mother, she is a brilliant scientist, who meet Jor-El at a young age. She, together with Jor-El created Kal-El's spaceship. In the New 52 version she is also an accomplished member of Krypton's millitary force as skilled with the blade as she is with the pen.
The Daily Planet: Metropolis' prime newspaper. The Daily Planet is one of the biggest mainstay's in Superman's lore in one way or another. Most of Superman's supporting cast is connected to the planet or was a part of it at one point. The main characters that work there except of course Lois Lane, are Perry White, the hard-boiled, ex-reporter editor-in-chief, Supeman's Pal Jimmy Olsen one of the few characters from Superman's supporting cast to get their own ongoings and get the Kirby treatment. Depending on the version Jimmy is either an awkward teenager or a dynamic photo-reporter ready foor action. He had many stories dedicated to him even the modern years. He is known for his transformations and disquises. Other members of the Planet are Cat Grant, the lifestyle reporter of the Planet, who currently owns a blog together with Clark, Steve Lombard the brash and overly self-confident Sports Reporter of the Planet and Ron Troupe a level-headed reporter who is also ready to take risks when the he hunts a story.
Superboy: A genetic clone from Superman's DNA and a human doner (originally Lex Luthor but changed in the New 52 to Lois Lane) Superboy emerged after Superman's death at the hands of Doomsday due to Cadmus' desire to create another Superman under their control. But the clone escaped, developed tactile telekinesis powers, met up with Superman in the ruins of Coast City and helped him defeat the evil Cyborg Superman. For the most part, Superboy wasn't really connected with Superman as his own series set him on his own path. But in the mid 2000s, when Superboy joined the Teen Titans, he learned that Lex Luthor was the other doner of his DNA. After a bout of mind controlling, Superboy took up a relationship with Wonder Girl, stayed with The Kents, sacrificed his life to stop the evil Superboy Prime and was brought back to life in The 31st Century. It's the mid 2000s where Superboy has really gained his popularity IMO because his character was made to be much more likeable without Connor becoming a Superman clone in personality. He's his own hero and has crafted his own legacy that makes him a very appealing and unique character.
Supergirl: Many have doned the mantle of Supergirl but the original and most famous of all is Kara-Zor-El. Kara was send from Krypton like Superman but she was at her teens when she did. Because of a meteor shower, she was stuck in suspended animation. Unlike Kal, Kara lived on Krypton making her tragedy, maybe, even worse than Kal-El's. Often hot-headed, Kara has a hard time adjusting on earth because of her kryptonian nature and upbringing. From the clutches of Darkseid to her Amazonian training, Kara got into many troubles before she finally became a full member of the super-hero community.
Krypto: The dog of Steel! Krypto is a kryptonian guardian dog. His courage and loyalty led him to protect the El family from the The Phantom Zone criminals but he was trapped as a result in it. He watched over Kal-El for years from the phantom zone like a ghost. He was there keeping the Man of Steel companionship even if Clark couldn't see him. A fan-favorite member of the Superman cast, Krypto is part of some of the most emotional and moving stories of Superman.
Even if this humble blog hasn't convinced the haters and critics who are reading this that Superman isn't a bland and boring character, at least you can see why there are those of us who like the character for what he is. And to fellow Superman fans reading this, hope you enjoy reading this piece by us. Apologies to those who were hoping their comments might appear in this section but our thread didn't get enough traffic and comments so we scraped that section and talked about the supporting cast instead. Still, feel free to share your comments and views below.
Hi there guys and gals, this is Lvenger and Squalleon here. After a PM suggestion from my co-writer here, we've decided to do a weekly blog for the next few weeks where we detail our thoughts on a piece of comic book related news. It could be DC, Marvel, Image, films or games or anything else that takes our fancy. Since we're both big fans of Wonder Woman as well as a certain Man of Steel, we decided our first blog should be about the strangest yet pre-predicted (thanks to Bleeding Cool) creator change in comics since JRJR came to on DC. I am of course referring to Meredith and David Finch taking over the Wonder Woman series from #36 onwards. After another one of their recent interviews on CBR, we thought we'd write our first blog on this changing of the guard. Read on to see our thoughts!
1.Why the Finches?
Sq: If DC wanted to minimize potential losses they would go with writers and artists that have a fanbase behind them. David Finch while popular he is often critisized for his work on women's faces and proportions, so he certaintly isn't the artist you would think, when you think Wonder Woman. Although in David's defence, he said in SDCC he spends 75% of his time fixing his flaws,like females, which are the majority of the characters in a Wonder Woman comic. Meredith is almost -if not completely- unknown, very inexperienced to say the least. So this change doesn't make sense in a business perspective, it is a huge risk even with the good editors DC put behind them. But if everything works out this would be a double win for DC, fixing a known artist and potentially introducing a strong new writer, which DC has done very successfully in the recent past.
Lv:Though I definitely agree an unknown creative team might not be the best way to drum up support for a new run on Wonder Woman, there have been times when Finch's art does look good. For instance, his Siege one shot combined detailed pencils with gritty inking making for an aesthetically pleasing issue. And his early Batman stuff (before he did the writing as well) fitted the gothic, grim tone of the series well. And Wonder Woman has received a much darker, horror inspired twist since Azzarello took over so perhaps Finch's style might carry over to Azzarello and Chiang's vision for Wonder Woman. Having said this, one need look no further than Forever Evil to see how messy Finch's pencils can be.
2. Is it really a risk?
Sq: For DC to take such a risk they must either believe in their product or plain not caring. Considering how hard they are promoting WW now and considering that WW's popularity is very fragile at this point, I don't believe it is the second option. So Meredith must have a very strong vision for Diana and since she is a new writer she can be easily manipulated by the editorial(another double win for DC). By putting David an experienced artist who has worked in the industry for a long time, Meredith has a 24/7 editor to reach out too. The co-operation will be strong since they live together and they know each others weaknesses and strengths. So DC doesn't really have any humongous risk here I am pretty sure the editorial will have a strong grip over the final product until Meredith proves herself and some elements of the new creative direction show that, the moment DC sees that the new team isn't working they will make quick work of it and change the direction once more.
Lv: As for DC taking a risk, I can see why they might be willing to place so much trust on what Meredith Finch plans to do to Wonder Woman. But here's my main problem with this move, if you go to her Comicvine page, you can only see a grand total of 3 comics that she's written before. I repeat, 3 comics. Now maybe she has some writing experience outside of comics, I don't know. But for an inexperienced writer to be given the reins of one of DC's most iconic characters and one of the most well known female superheroes ever, it's just not something that you give to an unknown writer. I'm willing to bet that Finch's standing in DC helped push the move along a bit. And as my writing partner has already mentioned, there's a strong probability that editorial control will be ever present from the very beginning of Meredith's run. Azzarello negotiated a 3 year, uninterrupted arc for his take on the Wonder Woman mythos. Whilst I haven't stressed enough on here how beautifully brilliant Azz's run is, it's come at the cost that Wonder Woman has not interacted with the wider DCU in her own series. Something DC seem to want to fix given the preview pages for Wonder Woman #36 where the Justice League and Swamp Thing show up in a few pages.
Swamp Thing; jobbing since 1971!
3.Thoughts on Meredith
LV: I'm still teetering on the fence myself in regards to what Meredith will bring to Wonder Woman. Though in her defense, she does say some of the right things in a recent CBR interview such as her gaining an understanding for the voice of the character and combining the little girl idolisation of Wonder Woman as well as a human personality too. Whilst this treads on the toes of the best depiction of Superman, it is not a bad idea to have both an icon and a human combined into one. The best heroes are such combinations of mixes between fantasy and reality. Plus, as a huge Azzarello fan, Meredith does say that she'll continue to include some of the characters from Azz's run whilst also fleshing out her own story. I'm glad that this certain part of Wonder Woman is not being cast out in favour of a totally mainstream series. Nonetheless, it cannot be denied that one of Meredith's inspirations for her series, aka the 1970s Lynda Carter Wonder Woman TV show, is a highly outdated and corny take on Wonder Woman. Bringing it back to the comics does not equal character growth or development for Princess Diana.
Sq: Meredith mentioned she wants WW to be a character every woman can relate too, she is a working woman, a warrior, a hero, a loved one and a lover. For me thats great news, WW is someone who girls must admire and relate too and boys must fall for.But lately that has been lost to say the least and WW became a very fluctuating character, often staying alive only because of her iconic nature. Meredith could finally make her both a solid character but without losing her iconic, archetypal status. And maybe her being new to the industry is exactly what Wonder Woman needs. As someone new, she will not try to redefine WW like big names did for the last decade. Instead she might build on what came before and add to that. Characters that aren't rebooted regularly are the ones with the most stable fanbases in the industry and the ones you don't have to worry about for example Batman and Daredevil.
4. Wonder Woman in the DCU.
Lv: Moreover, it seems as if the Finches are being tasked with catching up on all the time the Wonder Woman series has been separated from the DCU. This will probably mean more inclusions of characters like Superman who's still in a relationship with Wonder Woman (ugh) as well as guest stars like Swamp Thing. My concern with this is that the transition could be too instantaneous and rushed not to mention that the original Azzarello tone of the series could be lost amid the race to connect Wonder Woman to the New 52 DCU. Not to mention all the possible crossovers -_-
Sq: I think a more DCU connected Wonder Woman could be a good thing. Trying to do what Azzarello did would only look like a bad immitation. Also we don't really know anything about Wonder Woman and her relationship with the world. Does the world respect her, fear her, hate her or doesn't care for her? And a more DCU connected direction is also good for Meredith's vision, without the general DCU you would have a really limited view on WW's roles in life, something Meredith wants to focus on. Plus including some big names here and there would really give WW a sales boost, which the Wonder Woman title will need, especially for those first issues until the Finches can find a balance and hit their stride.
5. What We want from Wonder Woman.
Sq: What I want from Wonder Woman is pretty simple: consistency. Wonder Woman is even worse than Superman when it comes to reboots and direction changes. What I hope Wonder Woman will try to accomplish is a consistent world for Diana to live in. Its pretty hard for the casual reader to stay in a character that is rebooted all the time, yes as weird as that sounds. Consistent characters are the ones with the most stable fanbases and the richest worlds. Take Daredevil for example, he hasn't been rebooted since Miller's spectacular run, of course the character had some dark times like all heroes had, with mediocre runs or forgettable ones but Marvel didn't instantly rebooted the franchise. An even better example is Batman. The character who has the most stable continuity in the comics world. His supporting cast may be the richest in the industry and the consistent continuity provided DC countless spin-offs to gain money from. But thats not all because the character is consistent, the writers have a pretty clear version of the character in their head as opposed to characters like Wonder Woman who are difficult to define and capture down to the core. This is a perfect opportunity for DC to stay consistent and give Wonder Woman a status quo. They have a version the general audience loved and Wonder Woman is on an all time high, throwing all that out would be a waste. Also I really like what I hear about Wonder Woman being a character that every female can relate too. Wonder Woman needs the female audience to love her for something more than her iconic nature. She is the ultimate female personification, its a shame if the people she was meant to reach out too, doesn't empathise with her.Lastly, I want David Finch to be awesome. The guy has done some very good mainstream art back in the day. I want him to channel that grittyness, he had back in the Moon Knight days. And finally fix the barbie heads on females :P
Lv: What I want from Wonder Woman can be boiled down to simply not throwing out the old when moving in with the new. Azzarello has paved the foundations for a new era of Wonder Woman and regardless of the puritan critics, Azzarello's run marks the beginning of something new for Wonder Woman. For too long in the Pre Flashpoint era, Wonder Woman has bounced around creative teams and directions with no anchor holding her down. Now that Azz and Chiang have crafted a new world and mythos for Wonder Woman to live in, it would be completely foolish to abandon this developments just to get Wonder Woman back to the mainstream canon. The best thing that can be done is to combine the two into a coherent mixture. Retain Azzarello's gritty, Greek Horror mythology inspired take on Wonder Woman whilst bringing in the Justice League, Swamp Thing and whoever else they want to crossover with Wonder Woman. Build upon what you have and bring the two together organically. Finally, hopefully Wonder Woman can be combined into an iconic character and with a human personality fans can connect to. Bring those two attributes together and Wonder Woman can still retain her literal God Like status whilst also exhibiting a personality, emotions, feelings and desires in the story. That's what Azzarello has achieved and this is what The Finches need to maintain in their run.
Well that wraps things up for our first blog of Super Speculations. Hope you enjoyed reading it and feel free to share your opinion in the comments below. See you next week for more Super Speculations!
As most of you reading this blog know, the news broke that Thor was being replaced by a female character having no longer been found worthy of wielding Mjolnir. Instead, a female character will take over from Thor and, for some reason, actually be called Thor instead of Thor (even though Thor is Thor’s name rather than an identity) Confused much? That’s what Marvel’s latest PR stunt seems to be causing, mass confusion. So I’ll just share some of my thoughts and opinions on this change via several areas of consideration.
1. Why the gender change?
I fail to see why Marvel are making this change in the first place. It’s just change for the sake of change and that is never a good way of introducing something new. To keep things in perspective, Aaron’s other changes in the Thor run have WORKED. Introducing the Past, Present and Future Thor has worked wonders in making for a compelling character overlook at who Thor is and where he’s going. Gorr and The Necro Sword have been awesome additions to Thor’s rogues gallery as has Dario Agger. These are creative changes which have actually fit into Thor’s universe. The decision to make Thor a woman has come straight out of nowhere and seems to fly flat in the face of Aaron’s plans such as introducing new love interest Roz Solomon, making Thor’s world more cosmic and teasing a 9 Realms war. What place does a female Thor have other than Marvel’s attempts to pander to the rising female demographic in the comic book audience?
I'm really gonna miss Aaron writing stories about actual versions of Thor you know...
2. Why make the New Thor a Woman?
When you look at this move critically, exchanging Thor's gender really doesn't make sense. In mythology and in the comics, Thor is iconically recognised as a long blonde haired guy with a hammer in the comics and movies. Not only that, Thor is his literal name. You can’t just pick up the hammer and be Thor. You only have his power, not his name. It isn’t an identity or a mantle like Captain America or Iron Man that can be passed along. Thor is the intrinsic identity of the God of Thunder and this replacement is just as obviously out of place as Eric Masterson was as Thor’s replacement. Not only do Marvel make the mistake to remove Steve Rogers from the position of Captain America just to put a temporary Falcon in place for a token's character sake, they now have the misguided notion to promote the female sex by replacing Thor's brilliantly written series by Jason Aaron with a female lead. So I guess Tony's brother Arno is going to be the new Iron Man because Marvel's reasons are sooo enlightened on these matters. And there’s one ultimate nail in the coffin for Marvel's misguided attempts at promoting gender diversity; that the new female Thor will still be defined by being a female version of Thor. Call me old fashioned if you will but I like Captain America as Steve Rogers, Tony Stark as Iron Man and Thor Odinson as Thor. These shoehorned replacements can never match the appeal or history that the originals have. You can't beat the originals as they say.
The real Marvel 'Trinity' so to speak. No exceptions or replacements can beat The original Source Material.
3. Why pull this PR stunt and try to appeal to gender diversity?
As I mentioned in my first paragraph, this is a blatant PR stunt on Marvel’s part designed to pander to feminist calls for women to have greater roles in comics. The only problem here is that most fans don't want different Thor's or Captain America's, we just want good stories with the same old heroes. Change things up a little, introduce some interesting plot points, bring in some solid characterisation and entertaining action, add in some extra elements and you have the recipe for the right kind of comic. That’s what Aaron was doing before and that’s what has made Thor: God of Thunder one of the best comics Marvel are currently putting out. But editorial interference seems to think that it’s a good idea to promote 'gender equality.' If I was directly addressing the Thor creative team and editors who seem to want gender equality in the Thor line, this is what I'd say. Make a damn effort to promote Thor's female support cast; Jane Foster, Roz Solomon, Lady Sif, Valkyrie, hell even Angela since you're bringing her in (and I have the feeling Angela is going to be the new Thor now.) Believe me when I say female characters need more promotion and treatment in comics but make them new characters or flesh out the old ones you have. Don't shoe horn a female character into a male hero's position as, at the end of the day, she's still defined by the male character, not her own legacy. I know Marvel are going for the “anyone can wield the power of Thor, even women” approach but this is ultimately detrimental to the female hero. Why? Because making a female version of a male hero demeans the male hero and leaves the superheroine being solely defined as a female replacement of the male hero.
At the end of the day, this new Thor will probably end up being defined by her contrast in sex to the male Thor. Not as her own original character separate from Thor.
4. Why make it a new or existing female character?
From the sounds of the press release, Marvel seem to be hinting that this is a Pre existing character, not a new one. And my best bets on who the new female Thor will be stick mainly at either Angela or Thor Girl. Angela is the angel from the Spawn comics created by Neil Gaiman who sold the rights to Marvel. She’s been introduced into the Marvel Universe in Age of Ultron, has interacted with The Guardians of The Galaxy and is now officially Thor’s retconned sister thanks to Original Sin. Although her hair is ginger, it’s entirely possible she could be dying her hair to look more like Thor. And she has the power and potential worthiness criteria to wield the hammer but I have my doubts as to whether it’s Angela. But it could be Thor Girl based on a teaser that this new character “was saved by Thor and made herself look like him.” Both points fit the description of Thor Girl, an alien called Tarene who was once associated with Thor back in the 90s. From what I’ve heard, she’s ascended to a higher plane of existence so her coming back just to be the new Thor seems highly unlikely. That leaves the problem that, if this is a new character, what’s the point of their existence?
Will Angela be the new Thor?
Will Thor Girl make a return to the Marvel Universe and take over from The Odinson?
Or will it be an entirely new character?
Which brings me to:
5. What’s the point of temporary change?
Unlike some people who are literally taking Marvel and Aaron’s statement that this is the new Thor period, I have my doubts that this will last longer than a year. It’s stereotypical, derivative, unoriginal and screams of a PR stunt to try and win over the female demographic of comic readers. But whilst this is temporary change easily reverted, that doesn’t make it any less of a bad idea. Not only is Thor at one of his most popular times with two solid movies (in terms of box office revenue and critical acclaim) he also has a critically praised comic series adored by the fans. Which makes it all the more confusing as to why Marvel are changing Thor for a new female character. The simple answer is shock value and generating a stir for the sake of it all over comic book fandom. That is not good enough for justifying a change in the first place. Change for the sake of change is not the right reason for doing it. This idea isn’t going to be fondly remembered among Jason Aaron’s excellent Thor series prior to this unfortunate announcement.
Does anyone know how long Eric Masterson was Thor? Because I'm pretty sure he wasn't a popular or well loved addition to the footnotes of Thor's comic book history.
Can we jump to conclusions about the quality of this series? No, a Twitter conversion with Mat Elfring showed that much for certain. The perspective about the quality of this series is, for now, up in the air. Can we justifiably go ape **** about it? Only to an extent. Reasonable criticism and utter disbelief at Marvel’s inane decision making and slapped on PR is at least warranted. Losing one’s mind over this is not permissible however. But for me, it is the straw that broke the camel’s back. So, after Thor: GOT 25, I’m dropping that series and ending any Marvel related purchases on my pull list. Call that extreme if you want but Thor was the only series at Marvel I was willing to buy consistently without delay. Not to mention the only series I was truly interested in. I’ve been perfectly civil in my reasoning and given logical critiques of why I don’t like where this series is going. And that’s what’s needed, not irrational fanboyism. There are fortunately many reasons why this is clearly a bad move from day one of press release and if expressed in the right way, you can demonstrate why this series is a bad idea.
Finally, I hope the feminists and pushers for women to have greater roles in comics don't jump down my throat by proclaiming this a hate speech. It's an impassioned plea to Marvel pointing out the errors of their ways and, whilst it is just one opinion, is probably going to be shared by loads of die hard Thor fans too. If people like this then...good for you I guess, it's your call. But I most certainly do not. And I support a greater diversity in female leads such as Captain Marvel, Ms Marvel, Wonder Woman etc in comics. I just don't see the plausibility or sensibility in this foolish temporary change for the sake of change that is being proclaimed here. Cast this as an angry rant if you must but at least it'll be a rant where I've made some critical and fair points of this ostentatious change. That will be reverted in a year as all other Marvel changes are. And it will be a pointless, empty change all the same.
But this is just my one single opinion. Do you think Marvel have flown the coop making the new Thor a woman? Or is this a much needed change that will freshen Marvel's line and promote women's role in comics? Feel free to discuss, agree, disagree and contrast below in the comments.
Stolen shamelessly from TheTrueBarryAllen's list of debates blog, I figured I would do the same thing for my debates and future ones I have. I'll update this blog with different sections and new additions to my CAVs and tourney debates. This is meant to show the calibre of debaters I've had the privilege to debate against as well as show my different styles of debating and how I've conducted my argument in each debate.
I have some time to spare for a change so I decided to write another blog whilst I still can. Again, I do have ideas in mind for blog topics in the summer. Like Did The Cold War Influence the Comic Book Genre? or A Comparison between Atticus Finch (from To Kill A Mockingbird) and Superman so I'll work on those after my first year of university has finished. For now, I'll just write about some comics I'm looking forward to picking up in the future. My university constraints led me to restrict my pull list down to 4 comics (Superman Unchained, Thor: God of Thunder, Wonder Woman and Indestructible Hulk) but I already have in mind which comics I want to pick up in the future. So here's my rundown of 5 of my most anticipated choices in no particular order.
Fantastic Four by James Robinson and Leonard Kirk
It probably isn't common knowledge that I actually have a soft spot for Marvel's First Family. All of the Fantastic Four are in my top 20 favourite superheroes list and I watched a couple of their cartoons when I was younger. Both the 1990s one and the mid 2000s cartoon as well (the latter was overall better IMO.) Anyway I adored their family bond through both good and bad times in their history, the zany sci fi adventures the team went on and the uniqueness of each member of the team too. From Reed's brilliant but detached personality to Sue's maternal and protective instincts to Johnny's hilarious banter and relaxed attitude, my favourite was Ben Grimm's rock hard personality concealing a heart of gold. Although the FF have had some great runs in recent years, Matt Fraction's latest tenure on the FF has been utterly terrible for me. Retconning Ben into causing Doom's accident, taking them to the near breaking point unnecessarily all the while writing the team severely out of character with a convoluted plot to boot. When I heard Robinson's first arc was "The Fall of The Fantastic Four" I was initially put out by what seemed to be another repeat of history. But after listening to James on the podcast a few weeks ago, my tune changed for once. Robinson seemed genuinely enthusiastic and understanding of the FF's rich history and he promised to bring a positive and upbeat tone to the series. And that's what the FF is all about. It's not grim or gritty, the Fantastic Four are all about a family at the end of the day and they're a much more light hearted title. Like Superman or Spider-Man. And Robinson's promise of that has me truly appreciative of what Robinson is doing. Although this series has started, I'll be picking it up at issue 4 in May.
Justice League United by Jeff Lemire and Mark McKone
Although the New 52 has given us some absolutely duff and terrible creative teams, there have been diamonds in the rough. One of the most praised 'diamonds' DC currently have would be Jeff Lemire. Originally a writer for Vertigo, Lemire's mainstream work has earned great critical praise from DC fans. Animal Man has been widely applauded for its supernatural tone and exploration of family whilst his Green Arrow work has literally cleaned a turd into a shining bastion of comic book storytelling, resulting in its roaring critical success. Whilst it's too early to tell for certain how well this series will do, I have a very good gut feeling about Justice League United. Lemire is truly a quality writer and he plans to take a diverse roster of B lister characters including 3 of my favourites (Martian Manhunter, Green Arrow and Supergirl), set the team in the unique location of Canada allowing stories to be told away from the rest of the DCU and then give it a fast paced cosmic feel to the series. All these qualities are superb constituents for what should make a great series. If Lemire delivers strong characterisation, well oiled team mechanics, suitable sci fi plots and correct pacing then this could be the fresh new series the New 52 has been needing. For too long, fans have complained about the New 52 being recycled stories focusing mainly on Batman, Superman or Justice League titles without diversity or organic variation. And so if enough people get behind this unique title, this could be the gateway to opening up the New 52 DCU into something bigger and better. If not, it still looks like a quality title nonetheless.
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles by Kevin Eastman and Tom Waltz
"But Lvenger, aren't you already reading this fantastic, consistently well written and original series from IDW?" Well dear reader, I unfortunately made an error in judgement when I chose which comics to keep buying for uni. Indestructible Hulk has been a major disappointment and I'm only reading it till the series' end. I now see I should have stuck with what is easily one of my favourite comics currently out in the industry today. The recent Northampton arc was an emotionally charged cooldown to the epic City Fall saga and truly focused on the ramifications the last arc had on the characters. This is exactly what I want to see in my event stories; real consequences on the cast I care about. And Waltz' script is handled expertly with Eastman's gritty tone and lore to the TMNT franchise. This series delivers some of the best writing in comics today. Whether it's hilarious one liners, dark twists, in character dialogue or fast and frenetic action, TMNT can do almost no wrong on anything it tackles. I'll be jumping back on for issue 33 for the next arc and will most likely keep this comic on my pull list for next year. Unless another title steals the spotlight, TMNT is too good to go without again.
Saga by Brian K Vaughan and Fiona Staples
Another non DC or Marvel comic? Surprised aren't you? Well out of all the titles Image are putting out, only 3 have really captured my interest enough to consider buying. And this is one of them. The immensely popular Saga. A blend of sci-fi and fantasy on the Romeo and Juliet catapulted beyond any reader's wildest imaginations. I admit, even though I'm unfamiliar with Saga lore, this might serve as a footnote of what Saga is about. I have bought Saga Volume One in my London Comic Con trip last Sunday (shameless plug of my blog) but I'm reading Wonder Woman Volume 2: Guts and Kraven's Last Hunt first. Nonetheless, I imagine people will advise me to read more of Saga and maybe I will if I have time to spare. Admittedly, I do want to see what the fuss is all about for this title. Saga has blown away many people on here with its tight focus storytelling, uninhibited maturity on levels that would make Fredric Wertham incessantly enraged if he were still alive today and utterly unique characters like this Lying Cat I keep hearing so much about. This is as strange and yet enthralling as comics are supposed to get and the solicits, images and discussion about Saga have made me decide to pick up this series from issue 19 onwards.
C.O.W.L. by Kyle Higgins, Alec Siegel and Rod Reis
Yes another Image title on my pull list. Whatever is the world coming to? When I heard Image's January announcements, this was the title I was most interested in. Higgins delivered an intriguing premise based in 1960s Chicago where the focus of the story is on a superhero union which struck a contract to work for the city in exchange for payment for their services. I was fascinated by Higgins' pitch of a combination of the history of the rise of the union movements in the 60s, a noir flavoured story with crime fiction and the superhero genres thrown in as well. These influences pulled me into the appeal of Higgins' university project on which the series is based on. Plus it's a fresh new series with little lore behind it making it easier to dive right into this intriguing title. With its roots in America unionised history and a crime noir story with superheroes in it to boot, I'm really excited for what C.O.W.L. promises to bring to the table. Since Higgins has done an excellent job on a brilliant Nightwing series, I figure he's a writer who can definitely be trusted on an independent project where he can tell the stories he wants to tell.
So that makes for my most anticipated comics in the months to come. Hope you liked it. What are your comics you're looking forward to reading in the future? Feel free to comment below.
As you might have noticed, I wasn’t online on Sunday since I was at London Super Comic Con 2014. I haven’t had the time to write a proper blog for a while now. I do actually have ideas in mind for blog topics though. Like Did The Cold War Influence Comic Books? or A Comparison between Atticus Finch (from To Kill A Mockingbird), Stalin and Superman. Such topics may have to be saved for the summer holidays but on this, I can at least spend some time writing down what happened at my third outing at this particular comic convention.
On this occasion, my dad and I travelled into London by both car and the tube. Last time, we’d been hit with the full force of the London Expo traffic delaying my arrival to Dan Slott’s Superior Spider-Man panel (which in hindsight wasn’t such a bad thing really) so we decided to come in via the tube to cut time down. Thus, I arrived at the London Expo centre just before 1pm to the London Comic Con. And I was immediately greeted with the sight of Doctor Octopus casually chatting to Rogue and Rorschach. An obvious sign of where you are could not be made clearer. Man oh man were there loads of people there this time. Saturday had Jonathan Ross giving a panel so who knows how busy it was then?!
Anyway upon arriving I ventured off into the wilderness of the convention room to scout out some comic books. I came in with…in between £50-60 or over $100 in American currency and left with…significantly less than that. Seriously, I spent money on comics faster than Stan lost his money in this infamous South Park bank scene.
So you can tell I spent a lot of money on comics and graphic novels. And here’s the full list in case anyone is wondering what I bought
· New 52 Wonder Woman Volume 2: Guts
· The Amazing Spider-Man: Kraven’s Last Hunt
· Saga Volume 1
· Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: The Secret History of The Foot Clan
· The Mighty Thor: The Ballad of Beta Ray Bill
· Silver Surfer #2 and #4 (from Pak’s run
· Avengers #16 (volume 2)
· Avengers Classics #6
· JLA #47-48
· Gotham Central #13, 15
· Star Wars Legacy #10
· Fantastic Four #494-495
· Detective Comics #747, 753
· Action Comics #788-789
· Nightwing #30
· Green Lantern #50-52, #55-56 (first appearance of Kyle Rayner
· Ion: Guardian of the Universe #1, #2, #8
As you’ve probably guessed, carrying all these comics around was quite a heavy burden. So I decided to rest in a seated area and the closest seating to me was an open panel hosted by Avatar Press. Many of you guys on here might know of this company but basically they’re another indie comic book company based in America and founded by William Christensen, described by fellow writers at the panel as “the last shoe maker amongst a mass of shoe factories.” An apt analogy to say the least. And although Avatar Press is a company few have heard of, they had their top notch writers at the panel. There was Kieron Gilleon, better known for his Marvel work on Thor and Journey into Mystery discussing his latest work called Uber as well as other sci fi titles he was working on. There was Simon Spurrier, writer of Saren/Citizen Bane’s favourite Marvel title X-Men Legacy (this one’s for you :P) who discussed his latest web series called Disenchanted. And the well known (I think?) Max Brooks, whose father I probably don’t need to tell you about based on his last name, spilled the beans on his new comic series Extinction Parade which is basically Vampires vs Zombies. But it also breaks down the vampire genre and shows how the reasons why people admire vampires are actually weaknesses of the vampires. All framed against a zombie invasion the vampires initially approve of but then realise the horror of the situation. All of these projects sound genuinely interesting and intriguing and this is from a company that isn’t even on the map in the way other indie companies like Image or Dark Horse are. And to think I only went in there to read my comic stash I’d bought at the panel.
On an extra side note, amongst the myriad of creators present at LSCC, guess who else was there? That’s right, the notoriously ‘controversial’ Marvel writer to say the least, Dan Slott. Suffice to say, I restrained myself mentally from walking over to Mr Superior and giving him a piece of my mind on SpOck. That wasn’t why I’d come to Comic Con and I didn’t want to ruin my day nor his nor the people who wanted to speak to him. Come to think of it, I actually saw another notable for the wrong reasons comic face there. Rich Johnston of Bleeding Cool fame. I didn’t recognise him at the time but photos posted on the site showed me that the guy who was with Dan Slott for most of the time I was there was actually Johnston himself.
Two greater stirrers and twisted faces are hard to find in the comic book industry.
All in all, I had a nice time at the Con on Sunday. Not quite as memorable as the last 2 times but still plenty of fun. I’ll round off with some of the photos (mine were of exceptionally poor quality) taken at the con of cosplayers and costume wearers alike. Hope you liked reading this blog and what you see afterwards of the cosplayers! :)
For my last blog of 2013, I’ve decided to jump on the bandwagon of writing about what my 5 favourite series of 2013 have been. I’ve been much more experimental with indie and alternative comics but the Big Two still dominate my list for the most part. I’ve also stolen Deranged_Midget’s format so in exchange, I heavily recommend you check out his excellently written and engaging blog on his 5 favourite series of 2013. Now there will be SPOILERS for the series I’ve chosen so you’ve been warned here and now.
5. Indestructible Hulk
Despite a recent nosedive in quality in the disappointing conclusion to the Agent of TIME arc and lacklustre start to its new storyline, Mark Waid’s Indestructible Hulk series started off the year as one of the freshest, engaging and fun series of 2013 with only 3 issues underway. After Jason Aaron’s disgraceful run on the Green Giant, Waid took a new approach with the Hulk which was just what Doctor Banner ordered. Waid made Banner into an Agent of SHIELD in exchange for laboratory funding so that Banner can restore his scientific reputation and better the world with his own scientific invention. There’s also an intriguing ongoing mystery as to how Banner has blackmailed SHIELD into letting him work for them. Under Waid’s pen, Banner has become a brilliantly fleshed out character once more. He’s confident, outgoing, pragmatic and willing to take a direct approach in applying his intellect and using the Hulk to solve problems both scientifically and in the world threatening way. So far, Waid’s taken Hulk to the undersea city of Lemuria, to Jotunheim of the past and across the bounds of time and space itself ranging from the Wild West to ye olden Camelot. The wackiness of the stories embraces the old Silver Age fun that writers put into their comics and Waid captures that with modern sensibilities.
Although the artistic teams have been inconsistent (and not mostly liked by me) on this series, Lenil Yu started off as a damn near perfect fit as a Hulk artist. His kinetic style worked wonderfully for the action sequences of the series and the detail Yu puts into his facial expressions encapsulates a certain uniqueness with each person he draws. Hopefully Clay Mann’s gorgeous art will make for a suitable replacement in the next arc on this series
Favourite Issue: Indestructible Hulk #7
I was tempted to choose something from the Agent of TIME arc but its disappointing conclusion put me off that. Thus, this leaves the second part of Gods and Monsters as my favourite issue from Indestructible Hulk to date. Waid knocks his quality story telling out of the park with hilarious interactions between a Thor of the past and Hulk, particularly with Hulk seemingly controlling Mjolnir only for it to be revealed that Mjolnir was just dragging him along. This is complemented by a great fight between Thor and Hulk versus a band of Frost Giants, solid characterisations of all of Banner’s lab assistants and an emotionally charged cliffhanger when it is revealed that Patricia Wolman is suffering from Creutzfeld-Jakob disease, a form of brain cancer. And the best thing is that Waid treats this serious illness as realistically as possible. In a world where gods and aliens battle on a daily basis, cancer is not undermined at the expense of this mythological world and Waid shines on making this point apparent. I’m not a huge fan of Simonson’s current work but it was nostalgic seeing him draw Thor and Jotunheim again and it was OK to look at. Above all, Indestructible Hulk is a fun series to read and Waid makes it so in this issue.
4. Superman Unchained
Yeah, yeah, a Superman series has made it into my top 5 comics of 2013. Feel free to roll your eyes and groan etc, etc. Morrison’s concluding issues on Action Comics were good but his better writing came in 2012 IMO. Between Diggle’s departure leaving Daniels to hash out a contrived and mediocre story coupled with Lobdell writing two Superman titles until recently, being a Superman fan seemed to be a disappointing affair. Add in my despair with how I felt about Man of Steel and that made me feel even worse. Then along came Scott Snyder and Jim Lee with their new Superman Unchained series to rectify my doubts and remind me of why I am a Superman fan with an intriguing, classical feeling Superman story. Despite his lacklustre Batman writing, Snyder has crafted a tale that involves a Superman we’re more familiar with and love rather than the brash and angsty Superman that has come across in the New 52 so far. Once again, Superman is kind, compassionate and friendly yet also tough and authoritative and I love seeing these mixed characteristics in him again. Another great thing about this story is that Snyder looks set to take many aspects of Superman that make him an enduring character and turn them upside down to challenge Superman’s place in the world via General Lane’s secret military organisation, a new alien called Wraith with similar powers to Superman only on a greater scale with more experience along with a cyber-terrorist group known as Ascension causing world-wide problems. To its credit, this series has given Superman creative and unique challenges to test his powers and brains in how to prevent tragedy from occurring. Whether stopping a falling space station or the tallest building in the world from collapsing, Snyder and Lee have made tense disasters for Superman to overcome.
Whilst his delays have kept the book from being released, Jim Lee brings his incredibly detailed and unique art to another Superman story and the epic scale and feel of this series has only been helped by the expansive set pieces and iconic character models that Lee brings to the table. Hopefully, his art will keep getting better and better as he challenges himself even more on this series.
Favourite Issue: Superman Unchained #4
Although I have high hopes for Superman Unchained #5 coming out next week, so far it’s been issue 4 which has impressed me the most. I loved how Snyder provided vital roles and introspections of Superman’s supporting cast. Lex is given a mysterious and malevolent insight thanks to an amazingly well written paper folding dialogue, Lois winds up with the key to solving the story’s mystery and shedding light on the truth hidden from sight and Jimmy is made into the harbringer of Superman’s doom. Plus Lee’s sublime art illustrates an extremely dynamic fight of Superman and Wraith taking on some Russian drones designed to kill Superman should he ever turn rogue. Overall, these pieces of the puzzle made for a highly satisfying issue demonstrating how Superman stories should be written.
3. Thor: God of Thunder
Remember how I said Jason Aaron’s Hulk run was disgraceful? Yeah somehow he turned it all around for his Thor: God of Thunder series and has given fans one of the best Thor runs to date as well as my favourite Marvel NOW! series. Aaron utilises a distinct story telling mechanism involving 3 Thors telling Aaron’s story from different periods in Thor’s history. Not only does it allow the reader to see Thor’s character development over time, Aaron has been able to juggle multiple plot threads from different periods and weave them into one glorious Godbomb arc. The addition of the murderous Gorr into into Thor’s cosmic and mythological expansive place in the Marvel Universe has provided Thor with a serious challenge that places all the gods of the universe in peril.
The spectacular action is all made possible thanks to Esad Ribic’s sprawling art. His action sequences jump off the page with his amazing layouts and broad pencils and whenever he draws a splash page, one cannot help but be awed by the splendour Ribic can produce. Although his faces can be ridiculous and his hair can be more stuck in place than a rock, these are minor when compared to the grandour of Ribic’s art on the series.
Favourite Issue: Thor: God of Thunder #9
A well written story, important character development and essential plot expositions are what make the best stories. But when an issue has all that and a jaw dropping fight sequence between 3 Thors and Gorr, what’s not to like? All the tension and conflict that has been built up by Aaron explodes in this dynamic fight for the fate of all the gods in creation. Planets are cracked by the mere blows thrown, Gorr is blasted light years away and an entire sun is turned black. Such a fight worthy of the power at these 3 Thors’ command makes the inner child within us all squeal in delight at such a battle. Aaron crafts a blockbuster action sequence and Ribic makes it as dynamic as possible thanks to his amazing art style. With introspection into Gorr and the scales set for what’s at stake, this made for a truly epic issue and a series everyone could do themselves a favour by checking out.
2. Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles
If any series is underrated and underappreciated on my list, it is definitely this one. IDW’s Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles series is unquestionably one of the most vibrant and entertaining comics out today. The story is amazingly well written with characters feeling as life like and engrossing as possible, the plot threads have been expertly balanced and lore from all corners of the TMNT universe has been brought together by Kevin Eastman and Tom Waltz, blended together in a gritty environment and enriched by fresh new characters such as Alopex and stunningly refreshing stories like City Fall. This comic can juggle peaceful character exploration and humorous interactions with bombastic action and dark moments on a whim. I’ve been constantly engaged with what this new take on the TMNT universe will do next and what’s even more amazing is that it manages to appeal to older fans with its mature storytelling including many things from different cartoons and TMNT series whilst crafting them seamlessly in a manner where new readers can instantly jump on board and get a grip of what’s going on
The series has also benefitted from some talented artists but chief among them has been Mateus Santoloucho. His subtle distinctions between each Turtle even without their masks shows how unique his art style is. And more evidence for his distinctive style can be found in his glorious action sequences that flow seamlessly with every punch, kick and shot fired thanks to his exquisite positioning of each action sequence.
Yeah, yeah I’m cheating here but really these two issues have been some of the best TMNT and overall stories I’ve read all year. City Fall has been an incredibly ambitious gambit from the creative team and it’s paid off in a wonderful fashion. This is a storyline that I have truly cared about, from whether Leonardo will break the shackles of Kitsune’s mind control to the morally ambiguous actions Splinter has performed showing how his fatherly instincts have made him willing to do anything to save his son. In these final two acts, everything comes to a head as the Shredder makes his play for power in the New York underworld, the Turtles and their allies instigate a head on clash with the Foot and fan favourite mutants Bebop and Rocksteady make a triumphant and brutal return to TMNT comics. Shredder is made into the menacing and sadistic antagonist that even with some minor defeats is still able to gain considerable ground in his new empire and that’s what made City Fall so awesome. If ever there was a series more in need of support and praise, it has to be this series.
1. Wonder Woman
For some of you, this may be a strange choice for my number 1 comic of 2013. But for me, it’s been a naturally easy choice. Brian Azzarello’s Wonder Woman has been consistently amazing month after month after month. And I mean that seriously. I can hardly think of any minor problems with the series let alone major drawbacks. Every issue leaves me surprised, extremely satisfied and hungering for the next part of the story. From my perspective on the series, Azzarello’s amazing storytelling hinges on numerous aspects. He has incorporated the dark and twisted nature of the original Greek mythology, mixed it in with almost a Vertigo esque horror tone to the story and presented sweeping plot points played out by wonderfully rich characters with crafty ambitions and motivations of their own. The Greek Gods are given a crucial role within the story and hinging Wonder Woman’s mythology to that of the Greek Gods has given readers shocking twists such as making Wonder Woman a demi god and daughter of Zeus and overarching themes such as family within this brilliantly written tale. Including the expansion of Wonder Woman’s universe with new demigods and even tying in New God Orion into the story has made Wonder Woman into the most unique and refreshing comic on the shelves. Chiang’s art is exceptionally smooth and captures the bloodiness of the action within the series as well as very realistic facial expressions and contrasting backgrounds smoothly rendered.
Favourite Issue: Wonder Woman #23
This series and this issue may have its naysayers but for me, this was not only my favourite Wonder Woman comic of the series but the best comic of the year. Azzarello brings together the tense conflict between the First Born and Wonder Woman’s family, ramps up the threat the First Born poses to the entire world and produces wonderful character moments such as Ares bringing an army of his own to the battle and Zola and Hera’s changed attitudes towards each other. The issue progressed with a worrying despair as the First Born shrugged off all attempts to stop him only for the unexpected and surprising moment when Wonder Woman kills Ares to stop the First Born from taking his power as God of War, thus becoming the God of War herself. It’s an alarming and daring change in Wonder Woman’s status quo which sets the scene for some truly amazing stories to come. But for now, this issue remains the best issue out of the best series in DC’s New 52 to date thanks to Azzarello’s masterful and engaging writing.
Well those make up my list for my 5 favourite series of 2013. Hope you enjoyed reading it and my reasoning for each choice and feel free to include your thoughts and top series below! Have a Happy New Year to you all!
You’ll have to forgive my particularly foul mood this morning in venting on this blog given that I’ve just had a run in with my family over the classic age old problem for us comic book fans in storing one’s comics. The problem started moments after I woke up this morning as I awoke to my parents arguing over something. Upon venturing downstairs, I heard my mother complaining about a lack of space to store her files in a wooden cabinet where I keep my current pull list. You see, two of the files on the wooden cabinet originally kept 6 series from my pull list and my mother wanted me to stack more of my comics on top of each other to make space for her admin or some other folders. I assume plenty of you Viners know that stacking comics on top of each other bends them out of shape and piling two series or more on top of each other accelerates this. Besides, I do have a habit of keeping each series in its own pile, OCD as that is. Whilst I refused to pile multiple comics on top of each other, I did agree to give up one row of my comics since it is my parents’ house and their word is final etc. Then my brother, who was in the room at the time asked why I didn’t just stack them on top of each other and then seemingly reached into the cabinet to do such a thing. I overreacted not wanting my possessions moved by someone else who had no right to do so and grabbed his hand. That regrettably escalated things as he and I squared off over his apparent actions which brought my parents into it as well.
I then angrily moved 3 of my series upstairs to my room aggressively claiming that my mother now had much more space available and that this problem could have been solved without the arguments or confrontations. But then comes the worst part for me anyway. She then ranted about how not only I couldn’t keep buying 6 or 8 comics per month and keep them stored in the house but that such activities were sad, obsessive and indications of hoarding. And the worse one of all, that my desire to keep a storage of comic books would inevitably keep back my chances of having a relationship. Whilst I know people on the Vine who easily differ from the generalisation that comic nerds don’t get girlfriends, I can’t deny that my acne and other difficulties shall I say fit this stereotype regrettably well. And it’s incredibly painful and upsetting to hear someone who said that I needed more ‘Big Bang theory friends’ (that’s what she calls them after the Big Bang Theory) and even appreciates Superman on a certain level say such spiteful and mean spirited things. Maybe we all woke up on the wrong side of bed but I now see a prime example as to why I keep my comic book hobby a secret. Because of deprecating comments like that. I just never thought they’d come from my own mother though. Oh and bitterly for me, it was her birthday yesterday which I tried to make as nice and as relaxing a day as possible by keeping my older brother calm when he had problems cleaning his shirt, helping to make my own spaghetti bolognaise since I have multiple food allergies and just generally being as nice to my mother as possible out of everything she’s done for me in the past. I have to admit that this morning’s events rub salt on the ever stinging wound.
To switch this personal rant onto something more topical on these forums, this shows the real merits of switching to digital comics for the first time in my life. Which is ironic because I don’t really like reading my comics digitally. When reading my scans posted online, I don’t get the same clarity and visual distinction as I do reading a paper copy where my eyes can more easily adjust to the pictures and the words on the page. Reading books on a kindle or words on screen jars my eyes and doesn’t provide the smoothness of reading a paper comic or a hardback trade. But of course, digitally reading my comics would have avoided the main reason behind this morning’s argument, that is where I store my comics. You digital readers don’t have to worry about storage since it’s all on your tablet, IPhone, IPad, Kindle or PC which, whilst it’ll run out of storage space eventually, can store a helluva lot more digital comics than a house can store physical ones.
I guess this thread is a combination of the storage threads that crop up on here and the “What do other people think of you reading comics?” Since comics are what seems to be a lifelong passion for me, I’m not giving them up any time soon. I’ve already dropped a lot of my reading list to focus on university but I’ll be damned if I give them up completely. Nonetheless, this run in with my own mother over the nasty side of what the general population think of comic book readers has been a particularly disheartening event at that. It’s something that I’m still upset about and will probably have to seriously think about in years to come. Feel free to share thoughts about any problems you’ve had in this area or just complain as to why I’m ranting about personal issues on here. I’ll try and keep a cooler head than I have this morning.
I finally got the time to watch Thor: The Dark World yesterday and have decided to spend part of my evening writing this little old review on it since I haven’t blogged on a topic in a good long time. The first Thor film was fun but could have used some tweaking on certain aspects of it to make the film a more well rounded experience. And before watching the film, the trailers made the sequel seem like just the ticket. Now I will be discussing SPOILERS to varying degrees in this review so if you haven’t had the chance to watch Thor: The Dark World and don’t want to be spoiled, I would recommend scrolling no further.
Of course, if you don’t give a toss about spoilers, I’ll begin my review. The movie starts in exactly the same way the first Thor film did ie a Antony Hopkins narrated introduction of who Malekith, the villain of the piece is, what his plan was and how Asgard, led by Bor came into conflict with the Dark Elves over their plans for darkness and power via the Aether, an unlimited source of destructive energy. This does set the tone of the film up well and it does make the conflict that’s about to come seem epic but it is a repetitive derivative of the first film’s intro and brings up a problem about Malekith which I will expand upon later.
As for the film’s plot, it isn’t anything special but it’s easy to follow and is paced well throughout the film. The discord in the Nine Realms is a good way of highlighting the impact the first Thor movie has had on them all without Asgard to supervise them all and it’s a good place to tie up loose ends from the first Thor film. For what it’s worth also, Jane, Darcy and the intern’s intern (can’t remember his name) were tied into the story quite well as they went looking for Thor based on anomalous readings resulting in Jane being possessed by the Aether. I found it to be a relevant way of working Jane and the supporting Midgardians into the overall story. From there, we get Jane being taken to Asgard, the return of the Dark Elves and Thor being forced to team up with his treacherous half brother to seek out Svartelfheim and destroy the Aether. It’s not a bad plot at all in my mind but of course, it isn’t going to win the best awards for screen writing. There are suitably placed points for character development, action sequences, humourous gags, plot developments and shocking twists I never saw coming. So in terms of pacing, it’s much more well rounded than the first film was at crafting an overall cohesive plot.
Another short note on Thor’s plot/themes is its greater use of a ‘grounded’ so to speak perspective of the mythology of the Nine Realms. I think this is why Taylor was brought in as in his Game of Thrones directing, we saw a deft balance between the splendorous high courts of King’s Landing to the downtrodden everyday activities in Winterfell. A similar approach is attempted in Thor: The Dark World as Taylor gives us a more grounded view of Asgard. There are more scenes set in ordinary barracks, ‘halls of merriment’ as I shall call them and everyday streets of Asgard. Not to mention that Vanaheim and Svartelfheim are given their appearances in the course of the film. It’s a strange balance between a broader and yet also a more localised view of the Nine Realms. As for the sci fi/fantasy mix, it seems like a strange combination yet, given that Asgard is seen as possessing more advanced technology than magic, it is visually impressive to see pimped out Viking boats fly around and cannons firing. Plus the dark technology of the Dark Elves works well in contrasting them from the Asgardians in technology and thematically fitting with the film. Another great way the mix works is in the funeral scene of a certain group of fallen Asgardians, including Frigga who’d been killed by Kurse. In that scene, the Asgardians are given a traditional Viking funeral of burning ships that is quite touching to see yet once they move out into the sea of stars, their bodies evaporate and become part of the universe. Aesthetically, it’s beautifully moving. Of course, there is the problem of Asgardians bringing swords and shields to a gun fight during the Dark Elf attack which doesn’t go too well for them honestly.
Now onto acting. Again I have similar things to say about it really as I have been throughout this review. Hemsworth plays a much more mature Thor who’s more responsible and noble with a hint of bravado and charm from the first film making a pleasant mix in characterisation very reminiscent of Aaron’s portrayal of present day Thor. Portman does an able job as the female lead of the film though she could have used more confidence in her delivery at times. Kat Dennings and Chris Dowd from American and UK sitcoms respectively bring some excellent light hearted moments in this film in which there are plenty and their presence is much appreciated by me in the laughing department. Hopkins brings his brand of kingly authority to Odin once again blended with some excellent grieving and despairing emotions over his wife’s death and losing sight of what the Dark Elves are capable of. He manages both quiet and conflicting scenes very well. But the star of the show once again is Tom Hiddleston’s Loki. Hiddleston exudes sinister malevolence in his portrayal of Loki that moves forward from how he acted in The Avengers and produces a maniacal and unpredictable performance that is both funny and disturbing at the same time. Yet he also brings a great deal of complexity to the role evident in his reaction to Frigga’s death spiralling him other the edge and masking his true feelings on the matter. Not to mention that a certain betrayal and um, parting words scene brought a great dichotomy to what Loki truly feels about the situation in the movie.
Clearly, superhero films make action sequences a big part of their focus and this film is no exception. We get plenty of fight scenes from the LOTR inspired Asgardian clash against the Dark Elves in the introduction to Heimdall being a badass in bringing down a Dark Elf ship on his own. But I’m going to focus on two specific spoilery ones. The first is the best of the fight sequences from the film IMO, meaning the Thor and Loki vs Kurse fight. Kurse’s purpose in this film is basically the attack dog, not gonna lie but in that action sequence, I was absolutely 100% fine with that. The Kurse fight was brutal, tense and packed with epic clashes between Thor, Mjolnir and Kurse. Thor’s raging attacks lashing out against Kurse’s brutality made Kurse seem like an absolute beast. When he knocked Thor away like a fly, lifting a massive boulder like it was a book or when he started beating the snot out of Thor gives you the propensity (to quote a friend) to think “oh ****” because it looks like Thor might not win. Kurse is just that brutal and that dominating in the fight. Oh and visually it’s so awesome to see two powerhouses go at each other only for the villain to be double teamed and blinded into losing the fight in a neat way. Secondly, there’s the climatic Thor vs Malekith fight. Admittedly it doesn’t end as awesomely as the Kurse one does, it’s a bit anti climatic actually. But what it lacks in finality it makes up for in inventiveness and ingenuity. The portals to the Nine Realms are now closer than ever and Thor and Malekith bounce between the realms in a creative and actually rather funny way. This gag is also played out well in the attacks of the Dark Elves on Jane, Selvig and Darcy rather humorously. Additionally, Mjolnir gets separated from Thor and is involved as part of the gags in the final fight too as it keeps zipping around to home in on its wielder. It’s surprising to see such a high stakes battle contain a good amount of levity in it. One can say it detracts from the seriousness but there’s nothing wrong with this in my eyes.
Speaking of humour, this is actually one of the funniest Marvel and comic book films to date IMO. The humour is not sacrificed for the serious plot and antagonism posed in this film. The humour works for a number of reasons from performances given by Chris Dowd and Kat Dennings to the context of the humorous scene such as a hilarious cameo from a certain Avenger and Thor hanging up Mjolnir on the coat rack when he enters the apartment. Arguably, it may be overused but there were regular chuckles and laughing in the theatre over the gags in the film so if you’re entertained, I don’t see the problem in the use of humour.
Of course, I’ve been mostly positive about this film but there are several major weaknesses in it. First and foremost is the antagonist of the piece, Malekith the Accursed. Honestly, we never see much depth to Malekith at all. The intro establishes him as wanting to cover the universe in darkness and gain ultimate power. And that’s it, nothing changes in the film. Malekith is only made a threat in the film through his actions in the plot and his attack dog Kurse whose basic role is just that, Malekith’s brutal enforcer. We don’t see any reasons or motivations for what Malekith does, he does it just because he wants to with no ultimate goal or foresight at all. It is a weak portrayal of a formidable Thor villain which is really a shame because he’s portrayed by Christopher Eccleston, a very capable actor. It would seem the prosthetics of Malekith he has to wear coupled with speaking in Dark Elvish for most of his appearances limited Eccleston’s ability to give Malekith any distinctive characteristics or reasons why he’s truly evil.
The second criticism I shall make is the remnants of an abandoned love triangle dumped in the film in favour of streamlining the Thor/Jane romance. There are remnants of a possible love triangle between Thor, Sif and Jane and it was hinted that there would be such a triangle in the film in multiple interviews. Yet all we get is cryptic references and certain scenes which don’t lead anywhere and have had to be kept in for time that would have been used at providing a love triangle in the film. Abandoning this development has removed a potential area for interesting tensions between these 3 characters which would have balanced out well if executed correctly. Yet all that is for nought in favour of keeping the Thor/Jane romance. Whilst that is attempted to be fleshed out more, there’s still no real reason for the flame between Thor and Jane and the relationship between these two character doesn’t really go anywhere, similar to the first film’s romance not building up to anything particularly meaningful.
Thirdly, Thor’s Asgardian supporting cast is delegated to minor roles in this film and that really is a shame. Sif and the Warriors 3 presence in the first Thor film gave personality to the realm of Asgard via their interactions together. But here, the Warriors 3 and Sif are demoted to being mere decoys for Thor, Jane and Loki’s escape from Asgard. That’s it. No grand purpose, no real development, nothing significant like that. Rather, all they’re used for is a lackluster distraction and we don’t even get to see Sif fight off Asgardian soldiers unlike Volstagg and Fandral. Still, at least that’s better than Hogun being dumped in Vanaheim in the first 20 minutes (Does Hogun even originate from Vanaheim? He’s an Asgardian right?) Obviously, this lack of balancing between the roles the Asgardian cast plays in the film hampers one's enjoyment of it greatly since their appearances are essentially nothing more than glorified cameos.
I could nitpick even more but I’ll draw it to a close here. So my final view is that I enjoyed it for what this sequel was worth. Was it anywhere near perfect? No, absolutely not. Was it a really fun, well rounded film that improved on most of the errors of the last one and actually respected the source material? Yeah it was. There are stale areas such as the romance, the villain’s motivations and the lack of fully providing important roles for every member of the cast, especially the Asgardian ensemble. But I enjoyed myself watching Thor: The Dark World. It’s a worthy and enjoyable sequel to the original that makes improvements on what came before. And sometimes, that’s all one can ask for in a film.