@sandiego008 said:
@Empiorumfacemask: The point is that he had to reach a speed where time does not exist (aka time stands still) for him to beat Runner.
You are missing the point which is obvious as this argument is continuing to come up. Makarri had to go into a speed where there is no time to beat runner. It doesn't mean he is faster ... it means he went to such a high speed when runner wasn't expecting it at the end of the race and thus makarri won. Please stop using this as an argument against runner as it is incorrect.
Might as well keep bringing up batman > JLA crap if this is what you want to use for an argument here.
When...has anyone ever stated that Batman>>>Jla ?? Seriously show a link of anyone on this site saying this
There is no such thing as absolute speed. The theory of relativity disproves it, it was essentially jargon that Marvel brought up to make Makkari look credible. Marvel always attempts to use real life science terms in their stories even when they can't logically fit into what's happening in the comic.
Why should anyone not use it in an argument. Even if Makkari did have to pull an illogical plot device out of his ass to beat the Runner, the fact is for the entire race he was keeping up with him and Runner himself was getting frustrated because he couldn't shake him. At the very best Runner may be slightly faster than Makkari, which means he's out of his league against the Flashes and especially Zoom
Log in to comment