Well firstly most people dont feel that way. I think Marvel is hit or miss but i think a fair assesment of the general consensus is that IM1/CA2/GOTG/Avengers were very good, Thor/Ant-Man/Captain America were good, IM2/Thor 2/Avengers 2 were dissapointments and Hulk/IM3 were kind of OK. So i just cant agree with that proposition.
Well people just got differente tastes. But my point is that I don't think people really have an established parameter to judge the movie. They don't even have enough information to call the movie mediocre, you know? People just go "skinny WW, crazy hairy luthor, weird Doomsday, this movie suck" without really thinking about how Marvel's movies fails in the same way many times. And it's even worse because people already watched those movies to know what is wrong with them.
No it didnt. Even if you watched it frame by frame etc. And they never gave away something that totally invalidated the premise of the film. This would be like IM3 revealing that Ben Kingsley wasnt the Mandarin in the trailer
It did, really. The opening action scene, stark creating ultron, the scenes where everybody is under scarlet witch control (dream sequences), hulkbuster fighting scene, vision, the twins fighting scenes, final ultron fighting scene, they even hinted Pietro's death. The ONLY surprise in the movie was Hawkeye's house and family. And how could they spoile more than that? Ultron didn't survived as a plot twist, jarvis turning into Vision already was something expected, the trailers showed pretty much everything important. And do you think we can really say the trailer invalidated the premise of the film just because it showed something obvious (like Batman and Superman fighting side by side)?
You think Thanos is going to show up in Civil War and fight Cap/IM? No.
No, I don't think that.
Log in to comment