jamesewelch

I think the problem is that his two biggest roles (Darth Maul and Snake-Eyes) didn't required him to act much - just fight which I think he fit fine for those roles. After watching him in few episodes of Heroes, it's really hard to judge his acting ability. Acting in a TV show is a bit different than movie acting, so I don't want to base everything just on Heroes. I think he's a good guy and based on the interview I saw with Colbert, he'd actually take the role serious unlike a few other Marvel movie actors/actresses.

I'm not too fond of the concept. I'd rather Marvel just introduced a new character/series and canceled the Punisher series, instead of doing this.
 
I'm taking this Punisher series off my pull list. It's just jumped the shark a bit too far for my Punisher likes. The new Punisher:Max series should be out soon, so I'm thinking of adding that series to my pull list for my Punisher fix.

They've already stated that Frankencastle is going to be going on for at least a year (or maybe 10 issues). After Dark Reign: The List Punisher, I don't think Frank can go back to normal unless  they do a total reboot.

 
I've tried to avoid adding deaths, because of that. In Punisher 9, G.W. Bridge looks like he's dead (Punisher thinks he's dead) and I almost added it, but then in #10 he rises up and shoots someone. So I still don't know if he dies off camera in #10 or if he just got up and walked/crawled away.

** SPOILERS ***  
 

In Dark Reign: The List - Punisher, Frank Castle dies. His head and limbs are dismembered by Daken. The comic clearly shows his head and limbs separated and throw off a building and then carried back to the sewers. So Frank Castle is dead... However, Punisher #11 (Vol 7) is releasing in a couple of weeks to find Frankencastle (a Frankenstein version of a re-animated Frank Castle - Punisher).  

So does this count as a death for Punisher, if we know he'll be reanimated next month?

 

What about small stuff like "X-Necrosha" vs "X Necrosha"? 
 
The indixia, solitics, and cover say "X Necrosha", but it was added to comicvine with a dash. I can see how it's easy to accidentally add it in there, since all the other Marvel "X" titles use a dash.
 
I didn't want to correct the volume title if it would mess up the links and stuff, but since this is just a one shot, I don't know how big of an effect changing it would have.

That's actually the X Necrosha variant cover and not the X-Force variant. I just picked it up yesterday.
 
See cover at
http://www.comicvine.com/x-necrosha-necrosha-chapter-one-binary-the-foretelling/37-179203/

I hope it's still ongoing as well. I've been looking forward to a few apps that might use the ComicVine API.

@HaloKing343, that's what I initially thought as well - because of the numbering. But I think this is more of a Deadpool Annual type issue. I think the Team-Up team borrowed the numbering system from the #900 idea and ran with it as a different volume. Although, I do think it would be easier to find it next to #899, #898, etc. but technically, I'd say it should probably go wherever the indexia states.

Maybe you can convience the Comic-Vine programmers to add a field to the Comic Volume table to set allow rendering either ascending or descending?  :)
 
And just for further clarification on opening topic, the indexia did say "Deadpool" on the #900 issue. So it was in the correct location to begin with. I was just a bit confused over where the official volume name came from. I've read over the debate thread (masthead/cover vs indexia vs everything else).