IronAngelX's forum posts

#1 Posted by IronAngelX (193 posts) - - Show Bio

Definitely the best Daredevil book of the current series. Was so freaky and light and it blended well.

#2 Posted by IronAngelX (193 posts) - - Show Bio

Very good article.

#3 Posted by IronAngelX (193 posts) - - Show Bio

So hyped! AAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHH!

#4 Posted by IronAngelX (193 posts) - - Show Bio

The art is awful, I would read it since it's getting so much praise but I can't get past the artwork. It's like listening on just because it has the best lyrics despite the music being the worst ever.

#5 Posted by IronAngelX (193 posts) - - Show Bio

They better get someone good to write Superman/Wonder Woman because I've been loving Seoule's work on it thus far.

#6 Posted by IronAngelX (193 posts) - - Show Bio

PAJAMA! PAJAMA! PAJAMA!

#7 Posted by IronAngelX (193 posts) - - Show Bio

I'm so glad I ordered the first 5 off ebay for $13.00. I just read Bendis' Daredevil collection vol. 1 for the first time and loved it, and with all the good things I've heard about Waid's I went ahead and ordered the collected editions of those from my library. I'm about to boost my Daredevil knowledge exceptionally.

Also can't wait for Netlfix's series.

#8 Posted by IronAngelX (193 posts) - - Show Bio

I'm excited for the Leatherhead/Shredder fight.

#9 Posted by IronAngelX (193 posts) - - Show Bio

I hope the film does okay enough to have a sequel, I really want to see how they treat Beebop and Rocksteady.

#10 Edited by IronAngelX (193 posts) - - Show Bio

So is Spider-Woman in the same predicament that Quicksilver and Scarlett Witch are in in that they are both owned by opposing studios?

FOX and Marvel Studios both own Quicksilver and Scarlett Witch because although they are X-Men characters, they are just as equally Avengers characters as well.

with that logic, I'd venture to say that:

Sony and Marvel Studios both own Spider-Woman because although she is a Spider-character, she is equally (if not more so) an Avenger.