gonjasufi

@joewell said:

@JohnnyWalker said:

@joewell: oh come on. this is getting ridiculous. this is fan fic. and an obvious attempt at glorifying jack. it could only be more obvious if you said: jack wins. superman loses. debate.

oh, i'm sorry would you like me to take away the kritonite? I've actaly never watch the SJ cartoon.And i dont know why you keep saying every thing is fan-fic

>never watched samurai jack

>samurai jack avatar

just stopping in to lol at OP for the whole PZ/Z thing. wow..

Marvel, not really that much of a battle imo. 

Zoom.................really? 
team 1.

@Erik said:

@gonjasufi said:

Name one thing I've said that is wrong.

There you go with the unnecessary condescension, that must be some kind of psychological defensive mechanism you default to so your poor little ego doesn't take too much damage when you've been bested.

I literally haven't said anything in the way of denying his actual feats, I never questioned what he actually did in the movies. The conjecture I spoke of came into play when you made claims that he can damage Tony's armor. The only quantifiable feat that is going to do you any good in this argument is Captain America using his shield to incapacitate, or even damage at all, something that is equal to or greater than in strength than the IM armor.

• I already have. Everything.
• Oh tell me more Dr. Phil.
• What has the shield failed to damage? You make the incredible mistake of assuming the Iron Man armor is as durable as the comic counterpart. This was already shown not to be the case in the several instances where it was damaged by conventional means. It is impressive sure, but its durability does not escape similar materials in the real world.

You honestly haven't though. You havent said a single thing that disproves anything that I typed, nor have you put forth any convincing arguments. You haven't show any feats from cap that indicates he's capable of fucking around with anything that's on iron mans level, because those feats simply dont exist.

And yeah, knowledge of simple psychological mechanics definitely equate me to Dr. Phil.....ok.

@Erik said:

@Revenge_Of_Chucky said:

I was gonna direct this tords Erik, but nm,

Captain America never showed to be strong enough to harm Ironmans armor, that was IronMonger and Cap and his shield are not even 10% close to IronMongers strength.... IronMonger is up there with Hulks strength seeing he was able to bust out of the ground and so on.

Breaking concrete is Hulk level now? I am fairly certain you severely misunderstood my post to think I was saying Captain America is as strong as Iron Monger.

@gonjasufi said:

@Erik said:

@gonjasufi said:

My example isn't terrible. It takes into account the constant, Cap's strength(the baby's), and the variable, which is the material in cap's shield(chalk/diamond). What I'm trying to say, FOR THE THIRD FREAKING TIME, is that it doesn't matter what Cap's shield is made of, he can't throw it hard enough to break the armor. He has no feats with the shield to suggest that he could.

Please stop this horrible train wreck of argument.

LOL I get the distinct impression you do not fully understand what you are saying.

My argument still stands. Captain America has confirmed super human strength that is strong enough to rend steel. That strength is enough to throw a superior material hard enough to damage Iron Man.

What did I say that indicates a lack of understanding?

I'm getting the distinct impression you do not fully understand what constitutes an actual argument.

You are literally basing your entire argument off of conjecture, and yet you have the nerve to sit here and be condescending towards me.

LOL

• The fact that everything you say is wrong.
• Probably. I am so very uneducated after all. I should refer to your expansive knowledge on all things.
• It is not conjecture. Captain America did everything I said he did. Those are quantifiable feats.

Name one thing I've said that is wrong.

There you go with the unnecessary condescension, that must be some kind of psychological defensive mechanism you default to so your poor little ego doesn't take too much damage when you've been bested.

I literally haven't said anything in the way of denying his actual feats, I never questioned what he actually did in the movies. The conjecture I spoke of came into play when you made claims that he can damage Tony's armor. The only quantifiable feat that is going to do you any good in this argument is Captain America using his shield to incapacitate, or even damage at all, something that is equal to or greater than in strength than the IM armor.

@Pwok21 said:

On a side note how is Ultimate Tony going to cope with Loop-de-loop?

He hasn't taken on anyone with Vulture's scale of power before...

@gonjasufi:

I've been pretending that Ultimate Marvel doesn't exist since Ultimatum, where they just decided to kill every character. The Ultimate X-Men have interested me, as with the Spider-Men crossover but I'm am inclined to not go into that region right now...

If you go read how they ended the evil reed arc you will not want to think about touching anything ultimate.

They set it up to be so awesome, and it's like they just kind of had an idea to do something else out of nowhere so they rushed the shit out of ending. In the lamest way possible.

@Erik said:

@gonjasufi said:

My example isn't terrible. It takes into account the constant, Cap's strength(the baby's), and the variable, which is the material in cap's shield(chalk/diamond). What I'm trying to say, FOR THE THIRD FREAKING TIME, is that it doesn't matter what Cap's shield is made of, he can't throw it hard enough to break the armor. He has no feats with the shield to suggest that he could.

Please stop this horrible train wreck of argument.

LOL I get the distinct impression you do not fully understand what you are saying.

My argument still stands. Captain America has confirmed super human strength that is strong enough to rend steel. That strength is enough to throw a superior material hard enough to damage Iron Man.

What did I say that indicates a lack of understanding?

I'm getting the distinct impression you do not fully understand what constitutes an actual argument.

You are literally basing your entire argument off of conjecture, and yet you have the nerve to sit here and be condescending towards me.

LOL

@Pwok21 said:

I can see the Sinister Twelve beating Ultimate Iron Man.

Ultimate Iron Man needed specific suits built to operate efficiently because of his condition and Bleeding Edge doesn't have that. Plus he's still an alcoholic.

Well he used his tumor to make a connection with evil reid's city and take it over, so I guess he'll probably do that with bleeding edge also.

Nah, I really dont know. I just felt like pointing out how retarded that was.

@shenshixx said:

@gonjasufi said:

@shenshixx said:

5 most overrated characters

Thanos

Silver Surfer

Daredevil

Dr Doom

Wolverine

These are the 5 most overrated characters in comics and this is a FACT. Anyone who thinks otherwise is retarded

I think you have a very limited understanding as to what a fact consists of.

aww guy with thanos avatr is mad that thanos is overrated trash lol

Nah...I don't get angry over fictional characters. I wouldnt have replied if you simply stated that it was your opinion, I really dont care.

I was just letting you know that you're misusing the word fact.

If you're serious, you're dumb.

If you're trolling, you're still dumb because you lack subtlety and you're not upsetting anyone. You have fun though I guess, lol.