gamefreak9

This user has not updated recently.

12 0 24 0
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

gamefreak9's forum posts

  • 12 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for gamefreak9
gamefreak9

12

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By gamefreak9

I thought Goku and Vegeta were lame... there is no depth to them. Naruto Sasuke by far. You feel their history, they are both alone, but how they became alone defined who they are enough to make them completely different.

Avatar image for gamefreak9
gamefreak9

12

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By gamefreak9

Would be nice if they redesigned some of the powers... maybe NERF superman? If he can do everything at least make him mediocre at everything. Slower than flash, dumber than batman, etc

Avatar image for gamefreak9
gamefreak9

12

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By gamefreak9

I know lots people don't like Joker(ts mostly because they like to be non-conformists) but he is my fav and i imagine they will make him EVEN cooler!

Avatar image for gamefreak9
gamefreak9

12

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By gamefreak9

Well the movies are just the modern way of making comic books social. Unless the comic books find some other way of manifesting themselves socially this is the way its going to go... maybe if some propaganda happens and people don't trust each other anymore then they will spend more time alone indoors :P. 

Avatar image for gamefreak9
gamefreak9

12

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By gamefreak9

Sounds like a sad story :(, why can't he do it anymore? did he get weaker or did Hulk get stronger?? or was it just a realization after some face-offs?

Avatar image for gamefreak9
gamefreak9

12

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By gamefreak9

I'm pretty sure smoking kills the most(my only source "thank you for smoking"), but i also thing smoking and drugs kill people MUCH more directly, i think alcohol well 99 per cent of the deaths are indirect(drunk driving), so its not really the substance that's to blame but the people.

Avatar image for gamefreak9
gamefreak9

12

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By gamefreak9

I know there's some kind of family bond but i always thought super-woman(girl?) would understand superman much more, + probably much more sexually compatible... i mean if superman does have sex like everybody else don't his muscles tense like normal guys and then he might accidentally break lois? 

Avatar image for gamefreak9
gamefreak9

12

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By gamefreak9
@Green Skin:  
You don't have to advance the field to be mentally superior... passion and hard work go a long way.  I'm sure that with 2 centuries of math in our heads most math postgraduates have superior math knowledge than even newton or Einsten. 
 
All i'm saying is, there is evidence to make the argument that women are not as logical. You obviously don't understand what misogynistic means... like i said i am being fairly objective. Your the one crying because my views don't correspond with yours. Either way... your not a very open minded, or logical person so i agree that this is going nowhere. 
Avatar image for gamefreak9
gamefreak9

12

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By gamefreak9
@Green Skin said:

@gamefreak9 said:

@joshmightbe said:
@gamefreak9: You are a f**king idiot troll.
lol :P. I stated an unpopular opinion... i'm following the criteria... why am i a troll? Nvm your obviously not meant for listening to unpopular opinions. It's not like i said i hate women... or that they should not be equal. Just in case your interested in learning, 80% of women study a social science(knowledge driven not logical), 90% of mathematicians are men, and a woman has NEVER progressed the field.  Also i am not saying they are not smart, actually I've probably met more smart girls than guys, in my gifted program there were more girls.  Although women are said to have the same mean IQ, its proven that men have a much higher amount of active brain cells(women have a denser brain but active brain cells are still less), and i think there's bias in this research because of feminist activists. Personally even if the mean thing is not true, i do think male Variance is higher than the female one, no woman has ever surpassed 180 IQ(also i am talking about real IQ tests not bs online ones, these can only be administered by researchers to young people or by psychologists to young people, if one has taken an IQ test before the results are flawed).   Physical should be much more apparent... olympics.   Here's why i think its probably true, take or leave it, either way i'm sure you learned something(apart from the your an idiot, as witty of a line as it may be)
WRONG!  It's pretty clear you don't know what the hell your talking about, so stop  making things up.  The following are women who have progressed the field of math.  Keep in mind while you read this list that you are mentally inferior to each and every one of these women.
 
-Maria Gaetana Agnesi: She wrote the first book introducing integral and differential calculus.
-Ada Lovelace: She is designated as the 'first programmer' of the world. She laid the foundation for the massive world of software and computers.
-Sophie Germain: She worked on number theories and gave many interesting theorems on prime numbers. She even discovered new identities. Many such numbers are now called as "Sophie Germain primes".
-Amalie Emmy Noether: One of the famous theorems of physics 'Noether's Theorem', connecting conservation laws and symmetry was proposed by Noether.
I was pretty clear in Advanced the field no?? Integral and Differential calculus were invented by either Isaac Newton or Leibinz
  
First programmer might sound nice... but really what is an algorithm without a machine? a formula... or pattern of thought. I don't count her contributions as significant. Lets take a look at this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_algorithms. Sure you can skip through most of it because women didn't have rights but even in the 19th century... 
  
Sophie Germain, was a good mathematician, though i think you will find that she hardly did anything but put other formula's together. I just wikied her for a reminder and i learned that her elasticity theory would have been rejected had she been a man. But okay i think her  Therem on number theory did progress the field so add an "almost" prefix to the never.  
 
I have to say i'm surprised with the list you pulled up, Amalie is a great example of their contributions. Yet these few outlier's, though they do prove the NEVER wrong, they do not nullify the rest. Where did you pull these women from anyway?  
 
Listen talking about me being mentally inferior... you don't even know the first thing about me... making such an assumption makes you a proven idiot. I'm pretty sure you just did a google search for these women and then went on your high horse. You should also know how exponentially harder it becomes to improve the field of mathematics. Anw, even today when women, especially in education have all the opportunities men have, women still are straying from logical fields. I think you will find it very hard to prove that women can make as many contributions to logical fields as men can, VERY HARD indeed.    Please just don't be close minded and try to think objectively. 
Avatar image for gamefreak9
gamefreak9

12

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10  Edited By gamefreak9
@joshmightbe said:
@gamefreak9: You are a f**king idiot troll.
lol :P. I stated an unpopular opinion... i'm following the criteria... why am i a troll? Nvm your obviously not meant for listening to unpopular opinions. It's not like i said i hate women... or that they should not be equal. Just in case your interested in learning, 80% of women study a social science(knowledge driven not logical), 90% of mathematicians are men, and a woman has NEVER progressed the field.  Also i am not saying they are not smart, actually I've probably met more smart girls than guys, in my gifted program there were more girls.  Although women are said to have the same mean IQ, its proven that men have a much higher amount of active brain cells(women have a denser brain but active brain cells are still less), and i think there's bias in this research because of feminist activists. Personally even if the mean thing is not true, i do think male Variance is higher than the female one, no woman has ever surpassed 180 IQ(also i am talking about real IQ tests not bs online ones, these can only be administered by researchers to young people or by psychologists to young people, if one has taken an IQ test before the results are flawed).  
 
Physical should be much more apparent... olympics.  
 
Here's why i think its probably true, take or leave it, either way i'm sure you learned something(apart from the your an idiot, as witty of a line as it may be)
  • 12 results
  • 1
  • 2