@sparty_dbq: No, trying to be objective and not bring in any concerns or issues with his past stuff. And not everyone reading this review may be familiar with his work. I didn't feel the need to bring up past stuff when focusing on this issue.
@averywetfrog: There's no reading order or check list in this issue. And if there was, at the back would be a bad place. I don't want to have to turn to the last page and possible spoil the issue by glancing at the last story page. I didn't note or memorize the list at the end of ASM #9 either.