Fetts

@masterofmatches: I realize this is a two week bump, but have we met before? Did you have an alternative account name?

@anthp2000 I'm not commenting as to who would actually win, but I'm not so sure if A:TLA characters can dodge bullets. Even Aang, arguably the most elusive of any of the characters, struggled to "play keep away" against the Yuyan Archers. And arrows move at half speed the of bullets - and that's from modern bows. Arrows fired from longbows move at approximately 170 fps/115 mph - roughly 15% the speed of a bullet. To be fair, he was caught off guard, trying to keep the frozen frogs with him, and probably not at his full potential. But even still, in terms of reflexes, I don't believe we see as much drastic improvement as we do in his bending prowess.

The only other reflex feat that comes to mind is when he grabbed Sokka and swung him around to avoid a surprise blast from Combustion Man. Impressive. Nevertheless, if we were to estimate the projectile speed of one of these blasts, I believe the best source would be the nature of the blast's inspiration: firecrackers. Firecrackers, according to www.fireworkscrazy.co.uk, travel at 180 mph - more closely to 23% the speed of a bullet. Of course, that logic isn't full-proof, as Combustion Man's unique firebending blasts aren't firecrackers; but they should be enough to get solid estimations.

@masterofmatches: Haha, thank you. It's a visit, however. I pop in every now and then. Lots I'm working on in the real world.

I struggled to think if Rayvis could do enough damage. Grievous in canon may be a far cry from his Legends counterpart, but Grievous can take incredible amount of damage regardless. Surviving multiple explosions that enveloped him and him shrugging it off without much of a hitch. And in terms of healing ability, Rayvis is clearly a much farther cry than he is from Legends Durge. I think Grievous would likely win. Rayvis fights up close and four Grievous-spun lightsabers is just too much for him handle.

@johnnypowers: Well, as @ecstaticgrace refreshed memory, she'd need a full moon to do have her one winning advantage. So Aquaman would likely win regardless.

@ecstaticgrace: Man, it's late. You're right haha. Carry on.

If everyone is "as pictured" as the OP says, does that mean only live action feats apply? Or does it simply mean it's "Clone Wars-era Dooku and post-ROTJ-era Ahsoka Tano"?

If it was live-action feats only, Ahsoka would be sincerely hampered. I would question if she would even make it past 1. With Dooku, the duo would probably only stop at 1 or 2.

Assuming the set-up is the former assumption...

1. They pass.
2. They pass.
3. They pass.
4. To be honest, I think that's tricky.

   If Ahsoka Tano faced Obi-Wan, I think she'd fend off against him well, but I'm not entirely convinced she'd win. If Vader is any means of metrics, Vader was certainly the more dominant combatant, almost killing Ahsoka twice on their duel on Mortis. Obi-Wan, however, faired more favorably against Vader in the Kenobi show (like it or not). To be fair, he found more strength in the love he had for Luke and Leia. Regardless, however, I think Kenobi is a step above her based off their performances against Vader (as Kenobi proved more of a direct challenge). And Obi-Wan has more battle experience as well.

   At the same time, Grievous in canon was consistently bested by Jedi Masters such as Kit Fisto or Eeth Koth. While Dooku absolutely mastered the battlefield advantage against Obi-Wan and Anakin Skywalker simultaneously and secured victory against a cloaked Ventress and two nightsisters, whiledrugged, ambushed him with his guard down.

   I want to give a slight edge to Ahsoka and Count Dooku. If Ahsoka faces Obi-Wan, she's certainly skilled enough to stay on par with him for longer than Grievous would fair against Dooku. And if partners were reversed... Ahsoka Tano was certainly powerful enough to contend or even surpass Jedi Masters Post-ROTJ. In the Rebels era, she lasted far better against Vader than even Eeth Koth did when Vader hunted him down in Charles Soule's Vader comic series. And Count Dooku has proven time and time again that he knows how to handle Obi-Wan in particular. So a strong fight, but I'm going to say Ahsoka and Dooku.

5. They pass. Savage is too "clumsy" in technique (as Dooku put it) to be that much of a challenge. (Savage did get better, but his dueling is really nothing to write home about regardless).
6. I don't have reason to believe Ahsoka ever surpassed Anakin in skill, raw power, potential, and even tactics. And Count Dooku, though a hard challenge for sure, always seemed to low-key be on the fearful side of facing Anakin. But Asajj Ventress is indeed the weakest link. I'd wager either could defeat her after a good fight, as Anakin could probably beat either in an even better fight. But in spite of these good fights, Asajj would likely go down more quickly than anyone else of the four. Anakin couldn't handle both at the same time, so I'll say Ahsoka/Dooku takes it.
7. Yoda's too much. Ahsoka already lost to Vader. Dooku already lost to Yoda. Yoda is leagues more powerful than either of the duo.

I feel like there needs to be more information in the OP. Are they in character? And what is this win by? If they're in-character, let's face it - Aquaman is going to hold back considerably against a 14 year old girl. Chivalry isn't that dead lol. And Katara does have bloodbending as a last ditch option.

To be honest, I think there needs to be a more definitive scenario here, but in spite of the large gap in physique, Katara could conceivably take it. Either Aquaman holds back considerably, giving Katara enough time and options to resort to bloodbending; or it they start out-of-character, Katara could very well start with bloodbending.

I think this all depends on how delicate Aquaman is going to be when up against a fourteen-year old girl. And if they're out-of-character, I think it depends on how close Aquaman is to Katara before she can swiftly perform a bloodbending technique. That's how I see it.

I don't know if Rahm Kota could take the sheer amount of destructive damage Thor could dish out at. Moreover, anybody who can take a punch from Hulk, not become a bloodied pulp or even sustain any longstanding injuries, would have to have a level of skin density/durability many times more durable your average durasteel.

If Rahm Kota got close enough, he might be able to put a mark on Thor, but I have issue imagining a lightsaber searing through MCU Thor as easily as a stormtrooper would be cut through. Considering that, the level of AoE or un-block-able attacks that MCU Thor has, and that Thor technically has a flight advantage, I'm more inclined to give this to MCU Thor.