It's fairly simple, I think. While reality warpers of various stripes can have impressive effects on their environments, omnipotence strictly speaking is the ability to do anything with no limits under any circumstances. I'm not sure there's any character in comics that shows quite this level of power, as it doesn't make for much of a story. Mad Jim Jaspers for instance can do amazing stuff, but can be resisted by the Fury, so not omnipotent. Scarlet Witch altered the whole world but didn't achieve the effects she wanted in the end, and can be overcome and restricted by Xavier, Strange, etc., so not omnipotent. Even Eternity, the Living Tribunal, etc. all have been shown to be under some rules or limitations at times. Arguably, if you are omnipotent, you could cause yourself to be omnipresent, omniscient, etc., but they are not all the same thing, as knowing everything or being everywhere don't in themselves give you the ability to effect everything in any manner. Because omnipotence is such an absolute, it arguably doesn't have much meaning as a quality to be attributed to any discrete entity. Therefore confusion arises I think because it gets used as a colorful, exaggerative adjective to describe incredibly powerful characters.
Log in to comment