dernman

This is still the garb age off comics.

35976 10092 213 212
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

dernman's forum posts

Avatar image for dernman
dernman

35976

Forum Posts

10092

Wiki Points

212

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

#1  Edited By dernman

@kibo said:

@jamiewolfe7: So if marvel has one gay character you will stop reading their comics? Wow.

I have absolutely no idea how you could have gotten that from what he said. damn

Avatar image for dernman
dernman

35976

Forum Posts

10092

Wiki Points

212

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

You should put a spoiler tag in the title.

Avatar image for dernman
dernman

35976

Forum Posts

10092

Wiki Points

212

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

It sounds like someone wrote that for him but all politicians have speech writers sooo......

Avatar image for dernman
dernman

35976

Forum Posts

10092

Wiki Points

212

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

Avatar image for dernman
dernman

35976

Forum Posts

10092

Wiki Points

212

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

@lpnq said:
@somayareece said:

What does your views on the LGBT community have anything to do with this?

Just say your condolences and move along. I hate people.

What does your views on people have anything to do with this.

Just say your condolences and move on.

In response to the "I hate people", if you "Hate people" go isolate yourself.

heh

Avatar image for dernman
dernman

35976

Forum Posts

10092

Wiki Points

212

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

@JetiiMitra said:

They should have dropped Superman completely until the next reboot in 20-30 years.

That's a good dog.

Avatar image for dernman
dernman

35976

Forum Posts

10092

Wiki Points

212

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

While I'm not happy with Superman being a father as it ages him yet again it's still better than Lex as Superman.

Avatar image for dernman
dernman

35976

Forum Posts

10092

Wiki Points

212

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

#8  Edited By dernman

@jamiewolfe7 said:

@dernman: Now I'm a little curious. We have a Scarlet Witch and Quicksilver who are unrelated to Magneto (because he doesn't exit in that verse, neither do Mutants) and a Quicksilver who is, and likely Scarlet Witch who hasn't been introduced yet. What's your thoughts on that?

It bother me that they're not his children in the movies just like it bothers me that they're not his children in the comic anymore. I feel the change in the comic was done because the movies. No matter the reason I really don't like it.

Avatar image for dernman
dernman

35976

Forum Posts

10092

Wiki Points

212

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

@laflux said:

The key to good integration is developing characters of question rather than changing established characters for cheap progressive points.

Why do I think you'd be someone who'd argue the opposite of that?

Avatar image for dernman
dernman

35976

Forum Posts

10092

Wiki Points

212

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

#10  Edited By dernman

@jamiewolfe7 said:

@dernman: . With your own statements, I don't see how you can claim a principled purist stance with regards to the characters, use the Ultiverse as a justification for Nick Fury, and not see the movieverse as a separate verse from the comics. That seems all over the map to me, not principled.

I think we can eave the first half of you post alone. Though I could address the comment on you thinking I'm confusing racism and bigotry I rather leave it alone as I feel though we don't see eye to eye the rest ended nicely.

Second Half

I never said Sam Jackson wasn't against my purist principle. I just said it made it easier for some to take and it's probably because they still saw it as purist adaptation of the Ult Universe character which many saw as a different character who just shared the name. Not everyone who complains about change is going to see everything exactly the same. Thats why it shines a light on those who like to group different people's motives together.