dernman

In the bug forum they said they didn't make a dark theme.

Please tell me that will change. I'm open to almost anything it doesn't have to be black like before but I'm not joking when I say the pure bright white background hurts my eyes.

I never thought I would come to a place where I became an Anti-White supporter. Give me color, give me peace. I see that white and it's offensive to my eyes.

--------

Seriously are we going to get a better background theme?

Think man. With me hating grape that leaves more for you.

Just like Thor. :p

I know the reasoning behind it. I was just saying something in addition to it. I don't see the point for the articles to displayed and featured on the front page if there are none. Seeing all those old ones without new kinda hurt as someone who loves CV. With them no longer focusing on that, while in the short term it might be painful to get over what the site was before it might help in moving on.

It looked better before but with no new articles it shines a light out CV's slow death.

I'm more concerned with CV's white background. It's eye hurting.

Also this will get locked it it remains in battles section so it will be better to move it to general or off topic.

Me too. No joke the white background on CV bothers my eyes. I really hope they give options.

BACK OFF BOY!!! I hate grape.

Seriously though I am not heated. I'm still just at eyeroll level.

-------------------------------

NO NO NO where did the black CV background go??? The white, no joke hurts my eyes and it's ugly to boot. If we ddon't get it back then I really will be pissed..

@scouterv said:

@dernman said:

@richardcranium said:

@dernman: meh. Its not unfair for me to interpret your past post as referring to yourself. You said "i'm not saying" and a vague "that user" (as if someone should not reasonably interpret them for a self reference) and anyone will find it easy to latch on to that as you are referring to yourself.

You don't know what you're talking about. There is no reasonable way to interpret someone saying "that user" when talking about oneself.

Saying "That" directs to something beyond the point of origin. You're confusing "that" with "this".

"I'm not saying" wasn't vague. It was a clarification, deceleration of where I was coming from. That I wasn't saying what I was saying because I agreed with his remarks.

Any person who read my post and not just skimmed it would have realized that didn't refer to me. They also would have seen that the two different sentences were not a connected runnoff.

It doesn't make sense to interpret your way.

Not for nothing...but there's a saying. "Guilty dog barks loudest."

If you think he's talking about someone else, I don't think it's in your best interest to incriminate yourself by even responding.

There's another saying for that.

Hypocritical much? You make that quote about "none of my business" but here you are.

Also you failed in your use of that phrase because to use that, there would have to be any sense to what he said about someone saying "that' to refer to themselves.

You're not making sense. Why wouldn't I respond to him. Like that other user failed to comprehend the point about my post. Which was to point shine a light on the hypocrisy of his post and addressing his "moronic" accusation towards dex and those groups. Not Glover being anti- white or not.

Say for arguments sake I was defending Dex. Where did you get the idea you can only defend the people you agree with against someone who does something stupid. That's a pick your side, stay on your side, no matter if they're right or wrong mentality and hearkens to the exact kind of problems with the groups we brought up. Which is the point of conversation between me and richard.