The widespread myth that the only way character can be relatable when he's nerfed, which is such a lazy writing excuse. The struggle is always there. The person beneath the powers will always have doubts and fears, will always have passions and problems, no matter how much outward strength they exhibit. The humanity lies within the characters, not in the “Powers and Abilities” entry of their dossier.
A good writer shouldn't have any problems with this trope. Look at Alan Moore, he wrote classic pre-crisis Superman stories like Whatever happened to Man of Tomorrow, Man Who Has everything. He also wrote powerful characters like Supreme, Miracleman, Tom Strong and Swamp Thing who could literally survive anything. Grant Morrison wrote the awesome silveresque story All-Star Superman. Mark Waid's Kingdom Come Superman who was ten times more powerful than pre52superman and didn't had any weakness yet it still ended up as a classic story. Mark Miller wrote Red Son where Superman nearly took over the world. Even Garth Ennis, the writer of Preacher, Punisher, The Boys, Hitman, War Stories etc. , the guy who doesn't cares about superheroes and has mocked characters like Batman, Green Lantern, Avengers, X-Men etc. wrote a heartwarming Superman in Hitman 34 and JLA/Hitman.
Just look at some other powerful protagonists - Alucard, Asura, Yusuke, Iwakura Lain, Goku, Silver Surfer, Voltron, All-Might, Akira Fudo, Godzilla, Saitama, Classic Dr. strange, Swamp Thing, Captain Atom, Mr. Majestic, Spectre, Lucifer Morningstar they had their share of great stories in comics and other media. Would making them more vulnerable would somehow make them more interesting? These characters are supposed to be powerful, just like how Punisher and Daredevil are supposed to be street tier.
Log in to comment