What is so fricking wrong with Kirsten Dunst?????????
I am the first person to complain when hollywood hires crappy acting eye candy to play a role like with Lois Lane in the new Superman,or Halle Berry as storm and catwoman. However those 3 characters are supposed to be strong deep developed characters,and they were played terribly flat whereas Mary Jane isnt that complex a character to begin with she is merely Spidermans love interest,and for that Kirsten did a good job. In fact she did a great job as a sweet love interest with a touch of melancholy caught in spidermans web. She may have been bad in spiderman 3 but that was purely due to the writing that made no sense to begin with other then that she was fine for the role.
Marvel started ruining cyclops moral character to create an excuse to cause turmoil in his relationship with Jean Grey so they can pair her with their popularity king Wolveriene. Personally I think they should just left him and Jean alone and she should have given Wolveriene the telekinetic boot when he first hit on her.
I know Hollywood doesnt often care if an actress can act or not as long as they look nice and it's especially clear with super hero movies so I have learned to half accept it with some movies. However some female characters require better acting then others the question of this thread is which female heroes would be the most unacceptable if the actress playing her cannot actually act.
For me Harley Quinn is #1 on this list no other character would be close Storm would be #2 of course that crime against humanity already occured.
Log in to comment