glad they are now with team Cyclops...older Cyclops :)
DADDY_XERO's forum posts
Thor is a god, he has a weapon/tool forged in the heart of a star (or dying star), super strength, he is lord of the storm (lightning and tornadoes), he has thousands of years combat experience. he is also one of my fave comic book characters (that's comics in general not just marvel). he is awesome.
Faora wins! everything Thor has, she has an answer for. where thor likes to get in the fight (like a true Viking warrior god), Faora is a cold calculating soldier. not only is she willing to get her hands dirty, she relishes it.
I think cyke was at his best when he was portrayed as a ruthless tactician who doesn't care how people view him as he is more concerned with the safety of his people.
so I would like to see the ruthless tactician. or see him become the ruthless tactician as the movie progresses. and to take command from Xavier (because he has done something to betray the trust of all/most of the students)
@flameboy298: first class was set in the past, how the hell could Scott be there?
Scott is older than Alex. surely if the movie is set in the past than Scott should be the one more likely to appear in the movies.
I don't like this O5 in the present stuff at all. It was a great idea for a beginning-middle-end storyline, but to make it an ongoing thing? Ugh. I'm not feeling it.
And Kitty's reasoning is almost as horrid as Cyclops'. I usually like to think of stuff like this from the perceptive of it being a trait of the fictional character and not a lack of ability by the writer, but in this case it's kinda tough.
A good writer makes opposing arguments equally viable, allowing the reader to be equally hard pressed when considering the right path - like Civil War or the opening decision in the House of M. With this BotA storyline the writing team fails. With Scott, Kitty and Rachel claiming these teenagers should decide what should happen is ridiculous - especially since their running a school. And Kitty getting upset that the other's didn't back her view is even worse - completely illogical. "You're quitting because they didn't agree with you?!"
It's all lame.
Logan and Alex are my two favorite mutants right now. Everyone else I seriously dislike or am complete indifferent towards. If I were writing an X-Men comic right now, there would be a lot of deaths is all I'm saying.
so, your more an avenges fan than x-men?
that's cool, but neither logan or alex should be on any x-teams (I know alex currently isn't), and logan has been more of an avenger for years.
it's sad the only spider title i found interesting is being cancelled.
venom didn't interest me.
'superior' just comes across so rubbish. if i wanted to read about bad guys winning i would read the newspaper.
scarlet spider (to me) felt like a real story of redemption with the main character not turning into a wuss.
why not gambits horseman powers.
i call shenanigans, favoritism, unfair rules etc.
seriously though. if kurt can suddenly be undead then remy should have his horseman powers.
I call that makes no sense. Like, at all.
Gambit vs. deceased Nightcrawler with a hole in his chest = no debate since one of them can't fight. Or breathe. Or anything.
Gambit with his insanely powerful and loosely defined Horseman powers = unfair, not to mention he hasn't had 'em for months.
admittedly, i didn't think out my 'argument' (if it can be called that) at all.
but Gambit not using his horseman powers and not having them is very different. i think it's like the Angel situation where he (angel) needed the life seed to cure the corruption. the horseman is still there, just dormant. please correct me if wrong.
i won't lie, i want gambit to win. and he isn't above cheating to do it. so he should be able to use his horseman powers anyway. why? because! that's why.