captnmcdeadpool

I like the baseless claims being made by some people around here. Getting in shots while people are asleep or otherwise indisposed. Twisting words to fit their arguments ... trying to egg people on with childish insults ... Man, really brings me back to when another group was running around doing the same... how did that end again ?

I seem to recall they got shut down by someone. Hm.

This is where I wait for more baseless claims, passive-aggressive mentioning, and childish insults. So ...

I'll wait :)

@hyper_temporal_shift: Nah. At this point the only ones left standing are the same blowhards who refuse to appraise feats with anything less than "complete and total bias". Besides seems like you've done a fine job thinning their ranks. There's a reason they've resorted to insults, after all...

Means you're getting to them.

*poofs into thread after a six month hiatus*

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Well this is certainly a mess of a thing.

@hyper_temporal_shift, I see you've tried to keep feat appraisal objective in my absence. Good on you, man !

It says a lot when you have a single group of individuals that immediately resort to crying "alt account" and "circle jerk", ask you to not respond to them or mention them, or fall back on the tried and true method of attempted browbeating and otherwise claiming that arguments made are "pathetic" in favor of actually providing evidence.

If you are unsure what exactly, this says, I will be frank: It says that there is no argument to be made that can actually back up what they claim, and they must ultimately resort to other ... means.

In any event, below this comment will undoubtedly be more of the above, in an obvious attempt to discredit or otherwise invalidate other individuals and their arguments because their own arguments are lacking. But that's okay. The moment someone came in and challenged the misrepresented, self-contradictory, and otherwise inaccurate presentation of the Hulk, and requests for legitimate evidence was refused; they admitted that the Hulk does not win this.

Yet ... I'm a fair man, and I am not above admitting when I am wrong.

So.

If someone can present a legitimate and unbiased case for the Hulk, with scans, and do so in a way that does not manipulate the information presented (both for the Hulk, and against his opponents), I will gladly back it. If someone can provide evidence that supports that the touted "World Breaker" is a legitimate "World Breaker" without manipulating the information presented, or choosing to selectively apply what counts and does not count towards their argument, I will gladly back it.

I suspect, however, no one will answer the call.

I mean ... I don't know about anyone else, but when one person asks a fairly simple question and requests feats- pleasantly, mind you- and the immediate response is insults and a refusal to actually acquiesce to the request ...

Isn't there something wrong with that ?

In any event, as others have already said by this point; Thor and Bill win this. Rather handily, even.

@ecthelion: Well you're certainly not the individual I addressed. Hello new friend!

Sadly, though, I have not been 'destroyed' by your, er.. Hm. In any case, no. Though I do find it rather surprising you'd think so. Is this fellow known for that sort of thing, then? I'll admit I find that hard to believe since the topic at hand is still going (you know, the Thor/Hulk thing), which is the complete opposite of what 'destroy' would imply.

So again, this is me asking for some concrete evidence, as I'm genuinely curious to know what it may be.

@ghostravage So ... I mean ... You wouldn't happen to have anything, well ... concrete to support what, at this point, has been a longstanding attempt to paint the Hulk in a certain light? Because, so far, and as @theghostknight has already pointed out above; all you've really done is twist feats to support your argument, or go out of your way to downplay feats presented in favor of Thor.

So, some legitimate showings and/or proof would be greatly appreciated :)

@atheistknowledge: You really can't falsify the evidence that's already been posted man. The Surfer no sold everything Maestro hit him with (he hit him three times, not including the grab), and the Surfer casually put him on his ass. Surfer even goes so far as to threaten Maestro before leaving.

Maestro takes it like a dog lying down, and then tells someone to clean up the mess he made in making a fool of himself.

I mean as much as you naysay and attempt to alter the scans that were posted, you really can't; and for the umpteenth time it really just comes down to the fact that you refuse to admit your favorite character(s) can lose. It's not the end of the world man, no one's perfect.

Except maybe Tom Cruise.

Ignoring your insults, I'll just go so far as to note that the Surfer slapped the current version of Maestro, in the most recent Secret Wars event.

Off the back of that note, I'd also like to suggest actually reading a comic some time. Generally speaking it's a rather enjoyable way to pass the time. I mean, google search, respect threads, and copy pasting bits and pieces of arguments from other posters like some kind of Dr. Frankenstein are all things a person can do, I suppose. But so far, it hasn't done you any favors.