cameron83

@cameron83: kinda sound a tad racist by constantly saying white people don't have problems. People profile white people by thinking we are all racist or that we are all privileged. Anywho back on topic.

I didn't say that white people don't have problems (didn't even insinuate that),but I don't think that all racial problems are uniform throughout the board. They don't have to worry about,let's say,getting stopped at the airport and patted down while being suspected of being a criminal like a minority does. By the way,that isn't really what I would call racism. And it depends on what you mean by privileged,but it's pretty asinine and ignorant for anyone to suggest that white people have to worry about,let's say,being suspected of being a criminal or being discriminated against by people in society as much as a minority (for example,a black person or a hispanic person) does,and that it happens to the same degree. Not saying that you are saying this,not even implying that,but there are people that say that,which is where "white tears" comes into play when some people use it (other people just use it because they don't want to hear what a person says if they are white,which is incredibly bigoted,but whatever).

Racial profiling isn't arresting people for no reason, it is specifically targeting people, such as pulling a middle eastern person out of line at an airport and doing extra screening, or the "pat down" in NYC. They don't arrest innocent people due to racial profiling, that would fall under police corruption.

Racial profiling is targeting people of being criminals for their race and suspecting them of being criminals-you are correct. But innocent people are arrested,and many times they are targeted in the first place on the basis of their race via racial profiling,iirc

I mean,if that person was actually breaking the law,then I won't consider them "innocent",but if they are actually only suspected of being criminals really due to their race/gender/orientation,etc,then....

@frozen: It was one Earth or the other. One had to be destroyed for the other one to live. Also this are the iluminaties they would make choices that are not heroic at all.

@frozen: Read up on the entire New Avengers run so far coz a lot of it is pretty great. You'll understand what happened and why it had to be so.

The First problem is that his video is hosted on WorldStar Hiphop....

@cameron83: oh I am a heavy speeder, statistics support the idea that I speed. And I was basically imitating the situation people go through, they feel racial profiled even though the actually co it the crime.

@cameron83: I've been racially profiled before. I get pulled over all of the time because I have a relatively nice sports car and I am a white male, they think I am up to no good speeding.

What?

I don't know....if that's a case of racial profiling....but hey,I wasn't there. Anyway,if that's what happened,and you were actually being racially profiled (let's just say you were),were you really performing a crime?

However, it is still an effective tool, to target groups that statistically have a higher likelihood of committing crime. It isn't very moral though.

If you think that that's effective,locking up innocent people (that is the exact opposite of productive,unless you consider it effective to just fill up the jails),then let's just lock up every person in the ghettos then....even the kids,just so they don't risk performing a crime in the future. And race still isn't really the strongest factor to decide if someone is a criminal or not. If that's the case,can we just assume/target that every male is a rapist or a terrorist (because that's who most of the demographic is),and lock them up for now? If that seems productive in reducing the amount of terrorist attacks and rape attacks (despite the fact that there are female rapists,and despite the fact that there are innocent men that aren't terrorists,but f*ck them,as long as we reduced it with a very backwards method and notion). Not only is it immoral,but it is a very flawed method that goes against it's very goal by also targeting innocents in the process.

@cameron83: it is a rational argument, if a certain group of people are statistically being arrested and convicted of more crimes, it is effective to focus mor on that particular group, it is ignoring morality though.

@cameron83: t doesn't matter what group of people are causing statistically more crimes, targeting that group would be effective, just not moral.

@cameron83: I felt bad for you. And you were about to give up. I had to spring it when I did.

And I have gone against more experienced viners. Very experienced. Pyrogram.

You do realize the fact that more minorities are arrested and convicted of crimes does not mean that they actually commit crimes at a higher rate. They are being arrested and convicted at higher rates precisely because of tactics like racial profiling.

You have it backwards, you are pointing to the end result and saying that this is proof that the tactic is justified. The reason that the result is the way it is, is because of the tactic. Causality my friend.

@cameron83: Uh huh.

I got you.

And to prove I know what you posted:

It's two chicks with guns shooting red lasers.

One has a blue shirt with a marking on the shoulder and a white hat. Her belly is showing.

The other has a red, orange, and black outfit with glasses.