Binder_full_of_Women's forum posts

#1 Edited by Binder_full_of_Women (85 posts) - - Show Bio

@Lvenger said:

I've had enough of your arrogant schoolchild attitude to your posts. Cut it out. Now.
I and many others are sick and tired of your misguided attempts to 'correct' our misconceptions by posting infantile posts coupled with immature pictures.
well then gtfo
Scans and facts he usually twists and misshapes to his advantage. The guy might not throw out pure garbage but he twists what he says into rubbish.

You took a random picture of Superman in chains; admitted you didn't know the context; you decided to make up a feat to go with the picture. But you're telling people I twist facts?

#2 Posted by Binder_full_of_Women (85 posts) - - Show Bio

@Malevolent1 said:

@Binder_full_of_Women said:

@Esquire said:

@Binder_full_of_Women

I was typing up a nice big response when I saw Bane's new post above, including on-panel statements and proper contexts in all their radiant glory. So I decided it wasn't worth it. I genuinely hope you enjoy the rest of your time here on the Vine, and I apologize if you felt I was offensive or attacking in my previous posts.

You shouldn't let another persons opinion make you think what you have to say isn't worth saying. Personally Bane's post left me in want. And I genuinely appreciate the warm welcome of fellow comic book Virtuoso. No hurt feelings congressman, we're all big boys. I apologize if I seemed cross.

Y'know...I don't agree with everything Binder says, but he is consistent, and logical and you know exactly where he is coming from.

And he doesn't ride anyone's jock like some like to do. That's one of the reasons feats are not objectively scrutinized. I find it humorous that some here object to Binder's responses as rude and discourteous, when I know FOR A FACT that at least a few of you here have been far less courteous to others on these forums.

I for one look forward to more of your posts. I find them educational and funny. No apologies necessary.

I also think this is sort of humorous. How dare you post a picture in response to other users insulting you; you're such a douche Binder!! I've had people ignore the words on panel just so they could continue wanking. There was this one guy who just took a random photo and lied about a feat; then people got mad at me for trying to tell them. The amount of crazy that comes out of people over something as silly as comic books is an interesting experience.

I value your support. Vote Binder. On second thought, he's a douche. F Binder.

#3 Edited by Binder_full_of_Women (85 posts) - - Show Bio

@Killemall said:

@xxxddd said:

@jashro44 said:

*sigh* This thread is going to get locked isn't it T_T....

Binder is an arse sometimes.

I disagree with the underlined part :)

@XImpossibruX: I think what he is doing is awesome, and respectable (in most instances), its the attitude we dont like. Also contrary to what Blind and full of fail is claiming, he did NOT ask the for the thread to be locked, the thread was locked against his wishes which he is trying to lie about, which is weird.

More like you don't like being corrected. Did I say reading your post is going to Killemallmybraincells? Did I imply I was better than you or anyone else? What exactly about my attitude is so off putting? You don't like my attitude so you automatically stoop to insulting me? How can you and your friends talk about my attitude when it's ou cant make a statement without resorting to grade school level put downs?

Would you like to be invited to the private messages i sent? I think It's weird that you make this statement when you have no way of knowing. I'd invite Razzatazz here but I don't feel like I need to prove anything to you.

#4 Edited by Binder_full_of_Women (85 posts) - - Show Bio

@Jayfournines said:

@Binder_full_of_Women: Nah mate, you got it all wrong. I subscribe to the same citizenbane doctrine of "why do I care what people say in a comic book forum". I don't hate ya, I don't even know you to hate you; fact of the matter is that you like to insert douchey pics in your posts. No one here's complaining about your debating skills or your knowledge on the subject or anything. You come off as a douche, man, that's just it. I don't know if you are one, again, I do not know you...but unfortunately, the few posts that you DO make are laced with such douchebaggery that it is hard to ignore.

Why didn't you just say you were mad?
#5 Edited by Binder_full_of_Women (85 posts) - - Show Bio

Well let me go ahead and get these flags out the way. I didn't realized I rustled so many Jimmies by asking for evidence to support a claim. I have never implied I was better than anyone. I haven't suggested anyone was inferior. So where does all the mean girls like cattiness come from? Oh because I said people were wanking? I didn't call anyone out by name. I just said people were wanking feats. It's interesting to see people get upset when their name wasn't used in the context of wanking. You two talk about respect while disrespecting someone who never even mentioned your names? I'm here presenting arguments and you're name calling and arguing over who has the most hurt feelings. I hate Binder. No I hate him.

I got 99 problems but angry liberals aint one
#6 Edited by Binder_full_of_Women (85 posts) - - Show Bio

@Jayfournines said:

@Killemall said:

Why has no one banned Blind_and_full_of_fail yet?? Comicvine should allows flagging people who try to act smart and fail miserably =)

I don't get all the little pictures he posts trying to look cool...is it because i'm old? I mean, he actually takes the time to post pictures to increase his epenis? is that it? O_o

It's for you. Because you like to be all up on my E-nuts.

#7 Posted by Binder_full_of_Women (85 posts) - - Show Bio

@Esquire said:

@Binder_full_of_Women

I was typing up a nice big response when I saw Bane's new post above, including on-panel statements and proper contexts in all their radiant glory. So I decided it wasn't worth it. I genuinely hope you enjoy the rest of your time here on the Vine, and I apologize if you felt I was offensive or attacking in my previous posts.

You shouldn't let another persons opinion make you think what you have to say isn't worth saying. Personally Bane's post left me in want. And I genuinely appreciate the warm welcome of fellow comic book Virtuoso. No hurt feelings congressman, we're all big boys. I apologize if I seemed cross.

#8 Edited by Binder_full_of_Women (85 posts) - - Show Bio

@CitizenBane said:

You want a scan where it's explicitly stated that the Flash's durability increases in tandem with his speed, and I'll get to that.

Well I'm going to get to it now because it's the only thing that really matters.

Any object with Momentum is going to be hard to stop. The Flash was using momentum to avoid being knocked "the length of a football fields" when hit by Steppenwolf. That's supported by

- He's referencing being backhanded.

I'd like to point out you're saying Flash can take a hit from Titus without getting hurt but reference this fight and neglect to mention his injuries.

- He's still standing because of he speed up his metabolism to heal.

You still haven't posted any concrete evidence of Flash increasing his durability. Now I can get on to the filler.

But first, what exactly have I said that doesn't make sense? Slade has only hurt Flashes moving at low mach speeds

I haven't insinuated, suggested or implied that Slade Wilson hit a Flasher who was going as fast as they possibly could. So you shouldn't have a problem with me skipping over this part of your post.

In Teen Titans #2, Slade hurts Bart Allen by first depowering him with a tranquilizer when Bart comes to a halt and then shooting him while he's unable to access his speed:

But you also claimed that Flash had this ability even when he was not moving. The tranquilizer didn't depower Bart. If it did Slade wouldn't have needed to worry about Bart's metabolism breaking down the tranquilizer too quickly. Jay also made this statement.

In Deathstroke #13, Slade

Stunned and possibly knocked out the flash which is the only thing relevant to the point I was making.

None of your Deathstroke examples even begin to criticize any part of what I said.

I believe you said the speed force protects the flash from serious damage. Slade has stabbed, shot, and punched a Flash; they were all hurt. So this contradicts your claims. It's up to you if it's a criticism.

I said Flash's durability increases in tandem with his speed,

You also said he doesn't need to move at all.

you said "Deathstroke has hurt Flashes so that's wrong!",

I showed you scans of him stabbing shooting, and beating a Flash. They were all hurt in some way. Please elaborate

Batman survived an attack from Superman because Wonder Woman showed up in the nick of time and pulled him off.

Implying it's reasonable to believe Batman should survive an attack from an Unrestrained Superman for any amount of time. He shouldn't have had a torso after being hit with heat vision. He shouldn't have had a head after Superman got a hold of it.

Zoom punches Jay so hard he flies thousands of miles away

That's your interpretation.

Flash has regularly punched Class 100 bricks and has done so thousands of times in a second

He was hurt by Slade Wilson.

Titus punches him square in the face and he doesn't even get a nosebleed.

Bart was hit through a brick wall and broke 2 ribs.

Bart gets repeatedly hit by Darkseid's uncle Steppenwolf, even taking hits that send him flying the course of a football field (Batman can totally do that, right?).......

He can if he took blows from Superman. Steppenwolf couldn't break a simple Green lantern construct. Superman would have crushed it. If Superman hit someone full force they would trvael the length of China, not a football field. Which would suggest Stepphenwolf isn't all that powerful, but you would like me to assume he is based on who he's related to. Wasn't Steppenwolf killed by Clock King?

Read that a couple of times, let it sink in. All good?
Bart directly links his durability with the momentum that the Speed Force provides him.
Read that a couple of times, let it sink in. " Momentum is directly related to a body's mass and its velocity. layman calls velocity? Speed, because the layman doesn't know that velocity is speed in a particular direction.

Take out all the filler and this is what you're left with. The formula for momentum. I would like for you to explain how the formula for momentum increases the flash's durability? Mass rhymes with Democrat. So democrats must be Length x width. How does momentum correlate with increasing durability? It should be noted how the speed force protects its users from the effects of speed. Flash was thrown about like a frail dying African child. He then used the seed force to increase his momentum so he wouldn't be so easily tossed around. Doesn't that make more sense to you?

Here Flash is stripped of the Speed force and crashes into the ground going over 350 miles an hour. Moments later he gets up and fights off a group of villains How are you going to pin that on the speed force?

Where is the connection between momentum and your proposed increase in Flash's durability? It would appear to be missing. Can you find it for me please?

Digression aside, could you possibly require any more proof that Flash's durability increases in tandem with his speed or are you just going to be irrational for the heck of it?

I require proof because you haven't provided any. I'm not being irrational, quite the opposite. I gave you evidence showing Flash being hurt by Slade Wilson. I've shown the connection between the momentum comment and Wolfie's backhand. Your claims are all over the place. Flash needs to speed up to be super durable but ometimes he doesnt at all. You keep denying Slade ever hurt flash despite me showing you multiple instances in which he has. And i'm still waiting for you to explain how you established a connection to an increase in durability using the equation no connection between momentum and a proposed increase in durability. You only made a connection between momentum and speed. I'll know how rational you are by responding to my evidence with something other than insults.

Oh snap, you got me there. Sure, there are a dozen instances of the Flash being hurt by much less. I'd even say hundreds, and I can provide them if you want. But none of them are relevant to the argument that Flash has superhuman durability that rises with his own speed. I believe I've already proven my point with the example above.

They're relevant because they prove the speed force has consistently shown to no increase his durability. You haven't proven your point, so that increases their relevancy.

Am I claiming that Flash can survive a black hole while moving at Mach 10? No, he'd get shredded. Can he survive a black hole while moving at the speed of light? Yes. And here's another example of him doing just that:

Did you not see the regular people also inside the "blackhole" with Flash? Was there durability increased by the speed force as well?

#9 Posted by Binder_full_of_Women (85 posts) - - Show Bio

@Esquire said:

IF your entire post was sarcastic, does that mean that you don't have an effective response?

Did I say my entire post was sarcastic or did I say that statement was? I believe the scans I posted was an effective enough response don't you?

The fact remains that you consistently ask for in-context feats. Bane gave you several feats, and also provided the context surrounding them. Do you question the legitimacy of the feats? If not, then why would you disagree with Flash's durability? If so, why do you question something that's been consistently demonstrated in a variety of situations and contexts

"but do you have any concrete evidence of your claims? One user of the speed force saying they have this ability? How can you expect me to disregard the scans of Flash being injured by less than what you're claiming, when you don't have evidence he actually has the power to begin with?"

Sounds suspiciously like *gasp* cherry-picking to me.

You'll have to explain how that's cherry-picking. Quick while you're still fixated with me.

In my intermittent reading of the thread, I've seen six feats of Flash taking amounts of blunt trauma that would have killed or done serious damage to anyone with normal human durability. You apparently posted one feat of Kid Flash being hurt, (where, by the way? I didn't see it in the last five pages of discussion, and I don't remember you posting before that.), someone who's less adept with the Speed Force than Wally. I'm more inclined to go with the six than the one, surprisingly enough.

You've also seen 4 feats showing different Flash's being hurt like a normal men. If you wont knowledge my argument a conversation between us would be pointless.

#10 Edited by Binder_full_of_Women (85 posts) - - Show Bio

@Esquire said:

Do you not see the contradiction here? On-Panel statements are all well and good, but feats trump statements. Like in God_Spawn's post above, where Gambit has stated that he can't charge organic matter, but he's actually charged it several times. Feats trump statements. Bane showed feats, which is what you're asking for. He "showed you some pages in a comic book." But now you're saying the feats and pages aren't good? That you don't want examples, you want statements? Do you not see the contradiction?

No I don't considering I was being sarcastic, but I understand your confusion. Actually feats don't trump statements, because feats can be taken out of context. I'm not the biggest gambit expert in the world but I know he has gained and lost the ability to effect organic matter. He has had the power taken away by Sinister. Before that I believe it was a mental block. With that said I had a mod lock my thread because people wanted to cry and "interpret" statements rather than present me on panel evidence. They go hand in hand.

Why not?

Because I posted a scan of Kid Flash being hurt by blunt trauma.