Benuben's forum posts

#1 Posted by Benuben (230 posts) - - Show Bio

@sethysquare said:

I think this just means that Aquaman isn't selling well in subs. So they're pulling it out. Simple.

You do realise Aquaman has sales comparable with Spider-Man? What the hell is "welll enough" then? 3 bilion copies per month?

#2 Posted by Benuben (230 posts) - - Show Bio

@aztek_the_lost: True. It's not like they already had popular and criticly acllaimed series about young Spider-Man, giving readers such stories.

Peter WAS suposed to be that. His character evolved into something diffrent,

#3 Posted by Benuben (230 posts) - - Show Bio

@SC said:

Dear Marvel

Every night I read your X-Men comics to my little brothers and sisters, and I have used it to instill in them a sense of morality and justice, that all good, little believers should have. They are only 4, 6, 7, 8, the triplets are 10, 12, 15, 25 and 40. Lots of lil ones. Anyway we have experienced good storylines, like when Magneto ripped out the very bones from Wolverine, (lil Billy Jim Bob Billy Junior Junior was a little spooked by a man having his bones ripped though his pores) and bad storylines (that depraved heathen slut Emma Frost skanking up the place, oh boy she just needs a strong man to set her right, turkey sandwich I am glad that Cyclops is setting her and her villainous ways right) but through all the stories featuring chainsaws cutting arms and limbs off, decapitation, suicide, murder, heterosexual sex, homosexual sex, people impaled, necks being snapped, aliens ripping out from characters chests, eyes ripped out, spines broken, and all that freaky Chuck Austen stuff, I have relied on your book NOT having any immoral actions and attitudes in it. To attack the sanctity of marriage is one step too far. Consider your book and company boycotted.

An upstanding concerned morally sound citizen.

You just said, that two people getting married, because they are in love is immoral and then you have balls, to call yourself

"An upstanding concerned morally sound citizen"?

#4 Posted by Benuben (230 posts) - - Show Bio

@Avenging-X-Bolt: He does have an update. Its just details (smaller helmet, red lines ect.), but why repair something, that isnt broken?

#5 Posted by Benuben (230 posts) - - Show Bio

Forget Superman's chin, what the hell is up with Manchester Blacks mouth!? I don't recall him using lipstick in comic.

And really. who's idea it was, to choose such aimation for THIS story? I was waiting for Bugs Bunny to show up ask "What's up, Supes?"

#6 Posted by Benuben (230 posts) - - Show Bio

@doctor gravity: Sorry, but after what they did with Prometheus in Cry for justice, I will hapily never, ever see him again.

#7 Posted by Benuben (230 posts) - - Show Bio

The best way how make people forget something shallow and stupid, is making something else shallow and stupid. My answer: Live action movie. R-rated. F words. Mera showing boobs. Aquaman punching things every second scene. Blood. Violence. That will do.

#8 Posted by Benuben (230 posts) - - Show Bio

@Casshern: Ehm, YES SHE WAS! I have no idea what kind of stories you were reading, but before the whole OMIT nonsence, it was very clear, that she loves Peter and doesnt care, that hes Spider-Man.

#9 Posted by Benuben (230 posts) - - Show Bio

@HolyAvenger: You are kidding right? They never stopped making new villains fo Ollie. Thats only thing they do. Everytime, someone new gets to write Green Arrow, he creates new villains and then uses them over and over again.And after they leave, they are never used again. I dont want new villains, I want writers to use some of these, who are already there.

#10 Posted by Benuben (230 posts) - - Show Bio

I am not saying it's gonna hurt the show in some way, but I just don't get the point. I guess they didn't want people to be confused, because of Green Lantern movie (and as we all know, Warner Bros thinks all DC fans are complete ***).