AtPhantom

This user has not updated recently.

14434 25163 132 281
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

AtPhantom's forum posts

Avatar image for atphantom
AtPhantom

14434

Forum Posts

25163

Wiki Points

281

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

@atphantom: You're thinking about Post-Crisis Lois who was created to be Superman's spouse. Pre-Crisis Lois was a shallow character. Just like how DC made Lois Lane into a supportive character of Clark, DC can make a supportive character that's not annoying.

Lois Lane sucks. Lana is a much better character for Supes because Lana loved Clark before she loved Superman. Lois loved Superman first, she resented Clark.

I seriously have no idea how you came to any of the conclusions in this post. There's nothing about her that's actually annoying, and John Byrne's Man of Steel made it a point that she fell in love with Clark, not Superman.

Avatar image for atphantom
AtPhantom

14434

Forum Posts

25163

Wiki Points

281

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#2  Edited By AtPhantom

Seen this before. This just shows why Darkseid is better than Thanos.

BB

For some reason I find the idea that Thanos enjoys Two and Half Men entirely appropriate and in character.

More:

No Caption Provided
No Caption Provided
No Caption Provided

Avatar image for atphantom
AtPhantom

14434

Forum Posts

25163

Wiki Points

281

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#3  Edited By AtPhantom

Because this is just too good:

No Caption Provided
No Caption Provided
No Caption Provided
No Caption Provided
No Caption Provided

Avatar image for atphantom
AtPhantom

14434

Forum Posts

25163

Wiki Points

281

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Like, have you people actually read a comic with Lois Lane in it? Ever? The worst Lois ever does to Clark is call him out when he needs calling out. Outside of that she's as loving and supporting as any other character in comics there is. Just because she doesn't let him walk all over her and is treated as an equal rather than a girl hanging off the arm of a god doesn't mean she's a bitch.

Yeah because that description is clearly not biased at all..

I especially like how the entry for Lana Lang lists her as a passionate lover. Because Lana Lang's sex life has been the topic of so many comics over the years...

Avatar image for atphantom
AtPhantom

14434

Forum Posts

25163

Wiki Points

281

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#5  Edited By AtPhantom

@silverpool said:

It may not be rational to rob a bank, but if someone gets away with it and needs the money, it would be an easy, logical choice for them.

Something being logical can be subjective. Logic doesn't mean that criminals won't exist.

There is no logical reason for a monetary system honestly, so there would be no reason to steal money. Money is just paper given imaginary value

On the contrary, the monetary system is perfectly logical. Just because the value of something is imaginary doesn't mean it has no value. The value of everything is, ultimately, what we as humans assign to it.

Avatar image for atphantom
AtPhantom

14434

Forum Posts

25163

Wiki Points

281

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

So could V'ger it depowered entire fleets and planetary systems just by passing them. what would the death star do without power???

Don't you mean the Whale Probe? I don't recall V'ger depowering anything.

Avatar image for atphantom
AtPhantom

14434

Forum Posts

25163

Wiki Points

281

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

@cuddlebear said:

You read the story of Jesus and thought he was "killed by some Romans." Pilate washes his hands of it. The Romans are the executioners sure but The Pharisees are who killed him. As an "atheist" I interpret the story of Jesus to be a teacher who challenged religion and was killed by that religion for challenging it, something to revere I say. The Romans are bureaucrats trying to maintain order. It was the Pharisees, in the study, with the candlestick.

You must have been drunk when you posted this cause it don't make any sense.

If you actually read the stories ( not story of Jesus as there are Four Gospels there ) you would see that it was the Romans who actually kill Jesus not the Pharisees... the Pharisees only set up for Jesus to die... but they didn't kill him themselves. You even say in your post that The Romans was the Executioners ( which should have been the end of it ) but then you say the Pharisees killed him... which is totally contradictory to your former line.

#YourPostIsAnEpicFail

I think his point is that the Romans were the ones who physically killed him, the Pharisees were the instigators and masterminds behind his death and ultimately responsible for it while the Romans were the unwilling accomplices in the act. It is, I would say, the mainstream interpretation of the story.

...It's also, from a historical perspective, complete crap. The Romans had no reason to shy away from executing a Jewish troublemaker and every reason to want to see him dead. The entire story of Pilate washing his hands from the act was likely a later addition to portray the Empire in a better light since the Romans turned out to be Christianity's prime targets.

Avatar image for atphantom
AtPhantom

14434

Forum Posts

25163

Wiki Points

281

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Alduin wins. Ancalagon has no legit feats to go up against the world eater /w backup support. Size does not automatically give you the win.

Alduin has even less legit feats than Ancalagon.

Avatar image for atphantom
AtPhantom

14434

Forum Posts

25163

Wiki Points

281

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

@princearagorn1: You need to get your terminology straight. Thangorodrim is not three three mountain ranges. The Ered Engrin behind them, that's a mountain range. Thangorodrim are just three mountains. Yes, they're immense, but Ered Engrin behind them are far more massive in total. So are the Ered Wethrin, Ered Lomin, Ered Luin, Ered Gorgoroth and any other actual mountain range in Beleriand. Beleriand itself is something like a thousand miles across. The destruction of Thangorodrim isn't going to do a damn thing to it.

Exactly. The mountain range took the damage, saving angband from destruction.

It... doesn't work like that. Angband is a cavern underneath Thangorodrim. If Thangorodrim collapsed, Angband itself would have caved in. The mountains would have protected it, they would have made it worse because all that mass has to go somewhere, and the best place to go is straight down.

Avatar image for atphantom
AtPhantom

14434

Forum Posts

25163

Wiki Points

281

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

@russellmania77: So how do you define destroying the world?

We could end civilization, that's for sure. We could maybe, maybe exterminate humanity. Beyond that, we got nothing.