i hope...

Reasons?

people really need to stop getting people excited with these titles...

This is a horrible idea.

This is horrible only because if they do it, then in the comics they'll kill of Vision AGAIN and replace him with Agent Vision

Wow, way to make a misleading thread title.....

@Avenging-X-Bolt said:

Wow, way to make a misleading thread title.....

@X35 said:

This is horrible only because if they do it, then in the comics they'll kill of Vision AGAIN and replace him with Agent Vision

No, they'll most probably just merge the two of them together some weird way.

@ReVamp: No that would "confuse" the readers. They can't have a Vision that's anything unlike the movie version ¬_¬

@X35 said:

@ReVamp: No that would "confuse" the readers. They can't have a Vision that's anything unlike the movie version ¬_¬

:O. No, they'd say that the Vision that Stark made had to be based on human DNA, which is where Coulson comes in.

As for confusing readers, its not like Nick Fury is the same in the movies and in the 616 cannon. But yes, you've got the right sentiment for sure.

@X35 said:

@ReVamp: No that would "confuse" the readers. They can't have a Vision that's anything unlike the movie version ¬_¬

:O. No, they'd say that the Vision that Stark made had to be based on human DNA, which is where Coulson comes in.

As for confusing readers, its not like Nick Fury is the same in the movies and in the 616 cannon. But yes, you've got the right sentiment for sure.

@ReVamp said:

@Avenging-X-Bolt said:

Wow, way to make a misleading thread title.....

@Solarflare32 said:

Reasons?

Coulson, Vision... it rhymes! : )

@TheCannon said:

This is a horrible idea.

This.