Overseer
Overseer's last update: The god with a pen
If you notice any bugs, please give us a shout in the forums.

Summary About Me Blog Images Wiki Subs Reviews Forum Topics Lists Guides Trivia
Overseer's Reviews
Your Review Stats
Total Reviews Written 3 Reviews Your Average Review Score
Community Votes 2 out of 3 users recommended your reviews Total Comments On Your Reviews 5 Comments
Reviewed by Overseer
Nov. 4, 2009

Ok so, I've never read the book, never bought it and I NEVER WILL! You know why? Joe Q. is an idiot! Its been two years and I'm still waiting for Linkara from TGWTG.com to do a review of this mess. This issue, nigh, this whole story arc is the second worse comic I've ever seen Marvel create. Not only dose it trounce my favorite comic book couple since before I even read the comics, but I completly misses the chance for Peter to learn a valued lesson on the hardest thing. How to let go! Geez! Pete learns to let go of his aunt and move on with his life with MJ at his side would make a billion times better story then this crud! This is the Overseer, I review it, AND I'M STILL WAITING ON THE RETCON STORY ARC!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Reviewed by Overseer
Aug. 15, 2009

Spider-Man 3. Mix reviews, much fan displesure, and noted as the least liked of the Spider-Man trilogy. To keep it short, Spider-Man three is a very strong movie. Sam Rami did an outstanding job with Venom although he admited he didn't really understand the character. Getting the symbiote itself to be something of an addiction that can think was a very good summery of what the symbiote itself is protrayed as modernly. 
 
I myself also love the Sandman backstory of he's the true accidental killer of Uncle Ben, but its done in a way that Peter still could have stopped it. It was a stroke of genius. Sandman became a character people could really care about as the 'good guy who's got bad luck'. Not to far off from the good/bad guy that is the mainstream Sandman. 
 
Yes I'll admit, crying isn't Toby's strong suit, and Kirsten is not a perfect MJ, but I myself see their preformances as unforgetable in SM3 and find it to be one of the Under-Rated hits Marvel has made, along with Ang Lee's Hulk. 
 
(Besides, at least its not the Howerd the Duck movie, even George Lucas couldn't make that mess right. See the Nastalgia Critic for further details.) 
 
This is the Overseer, I reveiw it... because most of you are too lazy to!


Reviewed by Overseer
Aug. 15, 2009


Two of Marvel's biggest stars/powerhouses go at it. 
 
The story is simple but decent. Canadian gov. sends Wolverine to fight Hulk. Both are captured by Weapon X. Wolverine has to free Hulk before Weapon X brain washes him to take over the world ("Of Course!") or something just as bad.  
 
The animation is a strong point and works very well with the story.
 
A real credit to this half of "Hulk vs." is the fighting.  The opening fight between the two is well done with the battle switching favor constantly. The other fights are fast paced  and dose all the characters credit. You can almost feel it when Wolverine is socked in the jaw and have to cringe a little when Hulk rips Lady Deathstrikes arms off and you know just how painful it was when Hulk punched Sabertooth several miles away. 
 
Another credit is the voice acting. As always Steven Blum is a top form Wolverine. Encorperating much of the gruff tough guy deminor that help made Wolverine popular. Really Blum is one of the best Wolverine voices to date because he really understands the character. While Mark Acheson's voice isn't as rhythmic sounding as Liev Schreiber's, he captures a real dark under tone to Sabertooth, yet making him sound a lot like a dark Wolverine (maybe they really are brothers). Janyse Jaud seemed to capture a stirring preformance as Lady Deathstrike, including really sounding like she hated Wolverine to the point of killing him becoming an obsession. While I haven't heard many Omega Red voices nor really know much about him, I do think Colin Murdock is a decent OR. And while no one really compaires to the Lou  Ferrigno Hulk, Fred Tatasciore is decent. 
 
And lastly is the show stealer himself; Deadpool. Deadpool's first animated and true appearence in something other then comics and a video game is one of the biggest reasons to watch this movie. Every scene the future Merc With a Mouth is in, he steals with his always funny humor. He's also very close to his comic counter part, even braking the fourth wall, telling the other villains to "Strike a pose." just before a scene transition. Nolan North is definatly a great Deadpool, putting a lot of energy into the character and timing the jokes just right to get that last chuckle out of the audience. Perhaps North may even voice Deadpool in his upcoming appearence in Wolverine and the X-Men.
 
But the movie dose have a few flaws. Such as the part where Deathstrike is stabbing Wolverine was a little wierd. (Was she having an orgasm or something? I felt like for a brief second I was watching hentai insted of Marvel.) And while the others were having a great fight scene, Deadpool was kinda left out picking up his arm (albet humorusly). 
 
In total however Hulk vs. Wolverine was a very well done addition the Marvel's movies. A simple yet driving story, great action, strong character play on the actors' parts, few flaws and Deadpool's smashing entrence to animated Marvel the way he should be (go to hell Fox!). Definatly a solid 4.5 out of 5. 
 
This is the Overseer, I review it...because most of you are to lazy to do it!