The both of them are Modern day representations of modern day youth in terms of pop culture, but who actually connects to whom on a personal level and why?

Deadpool is like Spidey for college kids or more infamously Hip Modern Wolverine, he is constantly saying things and doing stuff that we or would say and more importantly he's escapism as a fun and exciting anti hero mercenary, like Spidey without the responsibility or the clichés. He's like a youthful representation of real life fantasies and rebellion as well as a empowered voice of Marvel editoral awareness.

The Wallcrawler is know to be the youngest and moral of the avengers, he therefore is Marvel U's official role model for young adults or children, but as a person he is know for his constant immaturity and awkwardness around established adults making him a avatar for the youth of today or in our time.

Which do you prefer between the two when it comes to be a personal inner child?

Deadpool is not for little kids

spiderman

Not judging by Lego Marvel Heroes and Ultimate Spider-Man.

Yeah Deadpool is not for kids.

That changes nothign.

I think Spider-Man. As a teenager, I can tell you most teens I know know more about Spidey than Deadpool. Even if they haven't read the comics, they've seen the movies, cartoons, whatever and can relate to him. I'll see other teens in Deadpool shirts and try talking to them about him and most I've met so far barely know who he is.

I've read some Deadpool over the years, but don't really care for the character all that much. Peter Parker as the "Amazing Spider-Man I've read for years when he was being accurately written as an adult in his late 20's. That character I can relate to, but not this younger throwback to cartoon comedy infested crap that Slott is pumping out.