@cameron83: When someone states what there intent was you cannot disagree unless your a mind and know otherwise.
Um....I am not really sure....what that means. No offense meant,though.
Was that a shot at me or something? Did I say something?
In any case,I was just stating a point,and just throwing it out there.
Comment was suppose to be mind reader
Pretty sure there are a ton of threads questioning Superman morality and talking about his storylines.
Your trying to use a wiki as an example of someones character development, a list of events, now that makes no sense. His only real character development has been about his powers, compared to the rest of the originals he hasn't done anything of note.
1.Superman is like,what,the most well known superhero in existence,and his been here since the 30s? Not exactly a fair comparison. Not only that,but since when has Iceman had 1/4th the exposure and priority as Superman? Obviously,that's rhetorical.
2. Holy misunderstanding Batman! It's like my previous post was in complete vanity. I am pretty sure that he has been on countless teams,and he's one of the original X-men. Count that as you wish.
You say that Storm has had no development other than a new haircut (I disagree,and she had a mohawk in the past). But I am pretty sure that there is a lot more to her,I'm pretty sure that she married Black Panther and was Queen of Wakanda,has been on X-men teams,etc etc
If the only thing you get from her character is "she's powerful",then it's clear that you're missing a lot of things. But it's better to ask someone like jazzroucher or other Storm fans on the matter,since they know 200x more than I do. And if you want development on Bobby,just create a thread and ask,if you truly want to know.
Since when did character develop= a change in views? I am pretty sure that it extends to far more than that.
And you say that Psylocke has excellent character development over the years (which I agree),but if I play devil's advocate to make a point,I can say how she's just the mutant "that was body switched" and that's it,even though she's been in many teams in the past. You see the problem with just simplifying her down to 1 moment in her history and saying "she's only been developed in power"?
Same with Cyclops,I agree with what you say concerning him,but what if I were to simplify the character and his status quo changes to something that just happened 3 years ago (becoming a mutant revolutionary). Even though he's done many things,he's lead many teams,etc.
Do you see my point? Most of this is rhetorical (and honestly,I'm losing patience,but really because of you),but the point is,I am pretty sure that there is so much more to the characters than "power",and if anything,it's an injustice to the characters in a way.
If anything,we can agree to disagree. However,I hope that this isn't in vain and you actually see the point.
Now,I have lots of work to do.
Log in to comment