Hmmmmmm

...okay! ....Him, Stanley Tucci, and Mark Strong look like they could all be related... Don't know what made me think of that but hmmm... LOL That's really all I have to say about that, since I don't remember him in Terminator or Transformers, but based on him role in Spiderman.... okay, sure! 
 
...he should make a cameo as Bat Lash or something! Hahaha

" @Caligula:  In the third movie Marco was the was named as the actual shooter, but the partner of the hijacker that Peter caught in the first movie. We all just like to pretend that third movie never happened.  Though from a legal standpoint, they were both still guilty of the murder. "

I like Papajohn's work and would love to see him play a part in Jonah Hex.

" @FoxxFireArt:  sort of. if you watch the scene Ben put his hands on the gunman first.  in a court of law he's technically guilty of provocation, if not assault and the gun mans shot that went off by reflex could be chalked up to self-defense. "

" @FoxxFireArt:  sort of. if you watch the scene Ben put his hands on the gunman first.  in a court of law he's technically guilty of provocation, if not assault and the gun mans shot that went off by reflex could be chalked up to self-defense. "

" @FoxxFireArt:  sort of. if you watch the scene Ben put his hands on the gunman first.  in a court of law he's technically guilty of provocation, if not assault and the gun mans shot that went off by reflex could be chalked up to self-defense. "

Why am I suddenly hungry for pizza?

@FoxxFireArt:

" @Bandito: 
whether a person is involved in a criminal act at the time is irrelevant to another.  "

I like peanut butter. 
 
Sorry, double post.

I wonder if he gets free pizza

" @FoxxFireArt: 
i already did. you only rebuttled to one of my many statements.  and i already rebuttled your rebuttle in advance as well.
 
unfortunately your perception of the legal system in this matter is that of the ones presented on televison shows as well, no offense.
example:
Even police face possibly consequences and reviews if they shoot an unarmed person. There are times when it is permited.   in fiction yes. in real life no. for just one example, the police department in Oshkosh, WI opened fire on Ray Pagel point blank with rubber bullets a number of 120+ times. they also hit him with nerve gas prior, and hit his face and eyes with pepper spray. as well, they bragged about killing him beforehand over the police radio. this was recorded. Ray Pagel was 67 years old. he was unconscious after they gassed him. the police were not punished. another more infamous was the incident in which a police officer shot a seven year old boy who was playing the game Lazer Tag in his back yard with his friends. the officer opened fire into the childs stomach several times and killed him. as a result Lazer tag was temporarly banned. i can keep going on. shall i mention the  Menendez brothers case, which your description of the court room severly is akin to, or is humanity past that mistake?  Uncle Ben approached and attempted to stop Marko on his own accord when Marko was startled, or something to the affect, and the gun (which Marko was unaware was real), went off. furthermore i might add that Marko did have a permit to carry at the point in question. again, Uncle Ben was free to go, he continued the confrontation of his own accord, he was no longer threatened, but he chose to engage and not comply.   the rest ive already stated as well and you dodged. id quote myself but its right there. "

I find it sad that all of you are arguing over something that was one of the biggest mistakes in Spider-Man 3. If you guys can legitimize that Ben Parker died because he was acting as a reckless individual, vigilante, what have you, it is a sad day for comics and comic-book movies. People, we should not be able to taint Uncle Ben memory for god's sake. Even if the argument is just for the sake of realism, it is just sad.
 
Besides the whole car jacking thing was how they Ben died in the movies not the comics. We should all remember that Uncle Ben was killed in cold blood when a burglar broke into the Parker household.

Just wow guys. *slow claps*

 
I've seen almost all of the films that have been mentioned above (except Spawn). But I've never seen Papajohn in any of those films.

@FoxxFireArt:

attempting to stop a crime, car-jacking in this case isnt self defense, its vigilantism. Ben was fine to go but insisted to go up to the party in question and put his hands on his shoulders and try to stop him " from making a mistake " as he put it, before the shot was drawn and fired. for all we know Ben may have directly caused the gun itself to go off, much less directed the gunmans actions. it could be said that the gunman felt threatened as well. once physical contact is initiated the ruling is in question. and unfortunately in the  United States legal system you are the one guilty of the assault then. if someone threatens you vocally, and you touch them its on you. as far as vigilantism goes, say for example someone is shoplifting. the store security approaches him, blocks his way and puts their  hands on him. at this point any charge on the shoplifter is either dropped or dropped down.  i believe the accused is guilty than no more than involuntary manslaughter, as he could not anticipate Uncle Ben's intention in holding onto him. further, the accused has a long history of mental disorder and social anxiety, coupled with mounting financial and family problems. with that, he was abused many times over the period of his own life, and enters a fugue state when he feels threatened, and especially when touched, and in that state is a different person entirely. the State board of mental health has reviewed him in the presentencing, and confirms  this as such. it is apparent by the evidence at hand, that the accused only had the intentions of  taking the vehicle and had the firearm in the case of self defense, which he acted upon. it is also very notable that the firearm was presented to Mr.Marko by his accomplice, whom was threatening him at the time, and that Mr. Dennis Carradine had told the accused that the  firearm was a replica, therefore non functioning. i should also remind the courts, and we will confirm more after recess, that my client has recently  undergone a physical...trauma, the likes upon which most could not begin to fathom in this room, one which was in fact caused by a combination of this departments recklessness, as well as the  carelessness of its own scientific research division in leaving an accessible particle accelerator running, which i might add is unlicensed, not up to code, and apparently the technicians where aware  of Mr.Marko's presence but mistook him for a bird , and that the accused needs to be in an appropriate  environment to attempt to cure, and rectify this uncanny fate which has been visited upon him. the penal institutions cannot even begin to provide adequate support for his newfound physical illness. his law suit at the city will i fact follow this case as well. it i our hope that this will not need to go to jury, and we can reach an outside agreement, especially considering this courts recent financial cutbacks.  and, do i really need to remind the courts again that a vision of how this scenario occurred taken from the imagination of this, Peter Parker is not admissible as evidence. thank you. "

I always lokked this guy.