Answer: "Yes, but only because you asked the question assuming the answer." It's like asking, "Is Flash The Fastest Man Alive?" rather than "Who could perform this feat more easily? Who would win in this fight? Etc." other measures by which to gauge strength rather than using a self-referential self-defining catch phrase which can't really be appropriated by anyone else. And that's essentially where Hulk's strength lies... in the vagaries of subjective absolutism. Not a bad thing, but his strength is less rationally driven than a lot of other characters. At least with respect to his strength, The Hulk is more of a concept than a well-defined character.
You can interpret strength a couple of ways including: Subjectively, Objectively, Technically, Mechanically, and Potentially. Here's my break down.
Subjective - This is a catch-all for the Title ("Strongest there is!"), Writer Fiat, Fan Popularity, Historical Significance, Character Pedigree, Tradition, etc. This is essentially a self-fulfilling prophecy. Hulk is the strongest because he is the strongest. No other reasoning really needs to exist because as long as it is accepted as a truism, all the subsequent created fiction, surrounding facts, or fan discussion will just affirm said truth. Hulk's great accomplishment here is to develop and be popularly attached to the catch phrase first. So even when faced with the Unstoppable, the Irresistible, or the Unmovable (incidentally all X-Characters) his pedigree trumps theirs and his "strength" gets his way. This is the core and the basis for Hulk's strength and as such is essentially unassailable because it is a meta realization existing outside the comics themselves- untouchable- yet continually influencing what actually appears on the page. That means much of the following analysis is "corrupted" by this factor, but nonetheless I press on....
Objective - This generally refers to "feats" or actual demonstrations of strength in book and in continuity. You can have all sorts of rules for interpreting the objective: cherry picking only the highest and greatest feats, selecting the same but discarding the ones that are outliers or uncharacteristically extraordinary, selecting only times when strength is explicitly compared, selecting times where an objective measurement of strength is stated, taking all appearances and attempting to develop an average, etc. At the end of the day, Hulk has no shortage of feats, but he's also decidedly mortal, physical, and planet bound. So by any of the above measures there is going to be someone who can- objectively- trump him in Marvel. What that leads us to is....
Technical - This is the outworking of the Subjective upon the Objective using semantics to define strength in such a way that the objective feats adhere to the subjective belief. Objectively, Galactus is going to have an easier time doing XYZ than Hulk. However, for the benefit of the Subjective, we will start interpreting what constitutes "Strength" such that Hulk is doing it only by strength whereas Galactus is doing it otherwise. The semantic parsing here is not really robust or consistent. You might say Hulk is purely physical strength versus cosmic strength, but why is Gamma Irradiated Anger Fueled bench press more physical than a bench press executed by the Power Cosmic or One Million Exploding Suns distilled into a serum? The real reason is to produce any kind of strength, which by definition, would exclude anyone but Hulk as the strongest.
Mechanical - This relates to how the powers actually work. Truth be told they don't. Hulk's powers aren't carefully rationalized or explained, mechanically divided or strictly rule based. We only get a heuristic... "The madder Hulk gets, the stronger Hulk gets!", which, of course, is in service of the Subjective, trumping even the mechanical explanation we're given. Why? Emotions are mechanical. Biochemistry, neurobiology, etc. place an upper finite limit on what emotion is. Only so many chemicals can be dumped into the brain and have meaning. Nonetheless we discard this reality for something symbolic... impossibly infinite anger. We do this because of....
Potential - A combination of the above factors and the sublimation of the Subjective... we completely discard any guise of rational comparison or objective measurement and simply embrace infinity by saying Hulk is the strongest because his potential- something unseen, unmeasured, only believed- is infinite. How can you argue with that? You can't deny it objectively because that measures the past and potential lies in the yet to be measured future. It embraces semantics by being- perhaps- technically true. And it fits what little mechanical explanation we're given, that Hulk- despite being a biological being- could achieve infinite anger somehow.
So, Hulk is the strongest there is... because Hulk is the strongest there is.
Log in to comment