Hiro-Kala and Skaar seem to have different opinions in going about destroying planets. Skaar follows the whole Rorshach view "Never compromise, even in the face of Armageddon" when he refused to make a decision between Sakaar or Galactus' century of sleep. However, Hiro-Kala just goes to another planet and completely destroys it in order to save the universe from Galactus (poisoning him). Which do you think is right? Does the ends justify the means or is murder wrong even if it means saving the universe?

Yeh, Hiro killed Axeman Bone's daughter because they both got a glimpse of the future, and it showed that when Hiro fell in love with Lihla the entire universe would have been destroyed. Unlike Hulk or Skaar, the emotion that is supposed to trigger Hiro's hulk power is love. I love this storyline and Hiro is quickly becoming one of my most favorite characters in MU because he is getting me to think, but I don't know if I agree with him. I was thinking personally more that Skaar (although deeply misguided) was more of a hero than Hiro (no pun intended :P). 
 
Like, couldn't Hiro have just stayed away from Lihla? Shouldn't he have at least tried to teach the other planets what the Old Power was for, instead of destroying them all?