What did you think about the green lantern movie? Pro's/Cons

knew it was going to be bad. It was horrible.

Marvel movies > DC Movies. 
 
 
Really. the BEST Batman movie was in 1988 staring Michael Kenton and Jack Nichelson. Batman Returns with Michael Kenton was the 2nd best. All other Batmans are irrelevant. 
The best Superman movies were Christopher Reeve.

Know a friend who saw the a bootleg, said it was pretty good. Not the best, not the worst. 
 
Still, anything is better then Electra, Hulk and DD lmao.... 
 
And nothing will best Dark Knight and orginal Superman movies as far as I'm concerned.

Know a friend who saw the a bootleg, said it was pretty good. Not the best, not the worst.  Still, anything is better then Electra, Hulk and DD lmao....  And nothing will best Dark Knight and orginal Superman movies as far as I'm concerned.

@MKF30 said:

Know a friend who saw the a bootleg, said it was pretty good. Not the best, not the worst.  Still, anything is better then Electra, Hulk and DD lmao....  And nothing will best Dark Knight and orginal Superman movies as far as I'm concerned.

Oh by Odin's beard! You just had to mention about those! Xavier had erased them off my mind and now I am tortured by the memories. Well at least Hulk 2 was good.

Despite the reviews I've still got hope for it. A movie doesn't have to blow me away for me to enjoy it.

I just came back from seeing the Green Lantern film... I thought it was pretty good... it was not a fantastic film... but it still had a solid balance of action and the plot and story was decent as well... give it an 86 out of 100

well i was wrong about first class (first x-men movie i actually enjoyed, even though mystique is still butchered), so i was pretty damn happy when i discovered that green lantern sucked all along, but i had been saying that since the first trailer dropped

I heard it wasn't really that great...I bet if they'd picked someone other than Ryan Renolds then it would have been better

@texasdeathmatch: I think It cost over a 100 million, That's sad. I think now Warner bros will think twice before going out of the old and familiar (Superman and Batman) comic book movies, Very unfortunate.

@unrealgamer38 said:

@texasdeathmatch: I think It cost over a 100 million, That's sad. I think now Warner bros will think twice before going out of the old and familiar (Superman and Batman) comic book movies, Very unfortunate.

it cost 200 million dollars apparently. 

I saw Thor not that long ago... And X-Men first class, which was pretty great. I really don't think it would be worth my money to go see this movie too, and I think a lot of other people may feel the same way. So it's kinda bad timing, releasing it so soon after both of those. Even if it is bad, nerds would see it if there wasn't anything else on offer.

Marvel movies > DC Movies.   Really. the BEST Batman movie was in 1988 staring Michael Kenton and Jack Nichelson. Batman Returns with Michael Kenton was the 2nd best. All other Batmans are irrelevant. The best Superman movies were Christopher Reeve.

I just came back from seeing the Green Lantern film... I thought it was pretty good... it was not a fantastic film... but it still had a solid balance of action and the plot and story was decent as well... give it an 86 out of 100

Why does people notice this one is not that good, but Thor is so loved.
I mean, both of this films were really week.
So far the best Supeheroe movies are.
TDK
The Incredible Hulk
Watchmen
Ironman was horribly underrated.
And the Burton films were very lame.

@Cypher's Gambit said:

Marvel movies > DC Movies.   Really. the BEST Batman movie was in 1988 staring Michael Kenton and Jack Nichelson. Batman Returns with Michael Kenton was the 2nd best. All other Batmans are irrelevant. The best Superman movies were Christopher Reeve.

Most of Marvel's movies have been terrible or just okay. They've only recently caught up to DC in the quality of their movies.

Why does people notice this one is not that good, but Thor is so loved. I mean, both of this films were really week. So far the best Supeheroe movies are. TDK The Incredible Hulk Watchmen Ironman was horribly underrated. And the Burton films were very lame.

I'm still going to see it.

still watching it 

@DeathpooltheT1000 said:

Why does people notice this one is not that good, but Thor is so loved. I mean, both of this films were really week. So far the best Supeheroe movies are. TDK The Incredible Hulk Watchmen Ironman was horribly underrated. And the Burton films were very lame.

You kiddin me? Thor was a great movie? Why you no like it?

@SpidermanWins said:

@DeathpooltheT1000 said:

Why does people notice this one is not that good, but Thor is so loved. I mean, both of this films were really week. So far the best Supeheroe movies are. TDK The Incredible Hulk Watchmen Ironman was horribly underrated. And the Burton films were very lame.

You kiddin me? Thor was a great movie? Why you no like it?

Nothing happens in all the freacking movie until the last 10 minutes. Bad CGI Bad Acting. Avenger was the main reason why people liked the film. QWithout the Avengers film coming, Thor was as good as Daredevil, Elektra, Hulk, heck eevn Ironman 2 was a better film.

super 8 was a great film,  i won't see green lantern with ryan reynolds he should have been deadpool. until its comes out on cable or dvd. i will be seeing captain america. 

I was gonna watch it tonight, but nahh. I'll pass.

@texasdeathmatch said:

Yeah, not going to see it after reading all of the bad reviews about it. That's unfortunate, because the movie looked REALLY expensive.

This.

The movie was freaking lame. Its sad that the best parts of the movie came when I thought about how they couldve done a scene better...........or when Hector Hammond was screaming lol

gonna go see it because ...it's the freakin Green Lantern!!! but my expectations are pretty low

Marvel= Good at movies. 
DC= Good at Animated movies. 
 
So, not really surprised. 

It's not surprising at all, most movies based on comics are turrible just turrible.

It should be good.

It ruined my life......
I'm a huge fan of GL but sadly D:

I am surprised at all the bad reviews, I figured it would at least get a little love out there, but it has been really, really bad!  I will still be in line to see it tomorrow(I mean tonight wow its 3:30 AM). At least the animated GL that just came out was really good, at least I liked it.

I saw Thor not that long ago... And X-Men first class, which was pretty great. I really don't think it would be worth my money to go see this movie too, and I think a lot of other people may feel the same way. So it's kinda bad timing, releasing it so soon after both of those. Even if it is bad, nerds would see it if there wasn't anything else on offer.

it deserves every bad review it has got.

Marvel= Good at movies. DC= Good at Animated movies.  So, not really surprised. 

I like it but can someone tell me why Sinestro puts on the yellow ring I mean he's not that important in the film. To me he just turns bad out of the blue.

I had no intention of seeing it a year ago, knew it would be terrible.

Not going to see it.

It really wasn't that bad, it wasn't exactly great but it was entertaining, not every movie has to be an oscar contender people

I heard it wasn't really that great...I bet if they'd picked someone other than Ryan Renolds then it would have been better

I like it but can someone tell me why Sinestro puts on the yellow ring I mean he's not that important in the film. To me he just turns bad out of the blue.

Marvel movies > DC Movies.   Really. the BEST Batman movie was in 1988 staring Michael Kenton and Jack Nichelson. Batman Returns with Michael Kenton was the 2nd best. All other Batmans are irrelevant. The best Superman movies were Christopher Reeve.

  Green Lantern  was as bad as I thought it was going to be.  Bad movie pacing, kept repeating the same stuff over and over (guess the director thought we were all goldfish), No real character development outside of Hal, and that's not till the end.  Ryan made a funny Green Lantern, but a bad Hal Jordan.