My only concern is if they can last long. The biggest problem a lot of the X-Men have with maintaining solos(And why they have historically failed to do so) is because besides Wolverine, none of the X-Men really have a mythos beyond the X-Men. Whereas if you take away Wolverine's X Man past, he still has his escapades throughout about a 100 whole years in Madripoor, Japan, the West, World War II, World War, etc. to fall back on. If I take away Cyclop's history as an X-Men?.... We're left with virtually nothing to work with. I just hope that writers can work on establishing interesting mythos for these characters so these solos can lost long. Don't want to get invested in these just to have them be cancelled. Besides that
#LongliveX-Mensolos
This is pretty much how I feel about it (though I think you could say the same about Magneto, too)
I guess that's why Cyclops' book is being set out with the Starjammers, who were always a weird fit in the X-men mythos to begin with: it's kind of the only other thing he's got.
Anyway, that said, I do think that any character can be interesting on their own, in the right story, or with the right writer. I'm just inclined to be less interested with X-men characters doing so because so much of what I like about most of them is how they play off each other.
Beyond that, I sort of hate to generalize since any story can be good or bad regardless of whether it's a solo perspective or an ensemble cast.
Log in to comment