@buttersdaman000: out of those 2 I think Gaiman understands Superman better.
Has he ever written a Superman book? I picked Whedon because of the fantastic job he did with Cyclops, another character that is looked at as dull or boring. Honestly, Whedons run is what changed my mind about Cyclops. Imagine if he could do that for Superman.
I want Bryan Q Miller to do an in universe Superman run...but...not if it means that he'd leave Smallville
What is it that everyone loves about Smallville? I tried the first two volumes but I just couldn't see what was so great. Now Adventures of Superman is something I could get in to.
I want Bryan Q Miller to do an in universe Superman run...but...not if it means that he'd leave Smallville
What is it that everyone loves about Smallville? I tried the first two volumes but I just couldn't see what was so great. Now Adventures of Superman is something I could get in to.
Has he ever written a Superman book? I picked Whedon because of the fantastic job he did with Cyclops, another character that is looked at as dull or boring. Honestly, Whedons run is what changed my mind about Cyclops. Imagine if he could do that for Superman.
So, that means that you find Superman to be dull and boring?
@buttersdaman000: out of those 2 I think Gaiman understands Superman better.
Has he ever written a Superman book? I picked Whedon because of the fantastic job he did with Cyclops, another character that is looked at as dull or boring. Honestly, Whedons run is what changed my mind about Cyclops. Imagine if he could do that for Superman.
Whedon doesn't need to 'change' Superman, he's enough of a well developed and complex character as he is. Or was Pre Flashpoint. Cyclops was already on the slippery road down to his despairing characterisation anyway so Whedon couldn't 'save' him IMO. Even Tom Breevort or some high ranking editor at Marvel expressed the open opinion on Twitter that they thought it was clear Cyclops was in the wrong and couldn't understand why fans were backing him. That says a lot about how Cyclops is being treated at Marvel.
I know he wrote a 3 issue mini entitled, "Logan", that was amazing for Marvel. I don't know if he has ever worked for DC. I do, however, imagine that he could write a brilliant Superman. Mainly because of his incredible characterization skills and great dialogues .
Has he ever written a Superman book? I picked Whedon because of the fantastic job he did with Cyclops, another character that is looked at as dull or boring. Honestly, Whedons run is what changed my mind about Cyclops. Imagine if he could do that for Superman.
So, that means that you find Superman to be dull and boring?
Ummmmm no? He's one of my favorite characters, and I'm all around this board....I said "another character that is looked at as dull and boring", not a character that I think is dull and boring. I just think that Whedon can do for non-superman fans what his x-men run did for me.
@buttersdaman000: out of those 2 I think Gaiman understands Superman better.
Has he ever written a Superman book? I picked Whedon because of the fantastic job he did with Cyclops, another character that is looked at as dull or boring. Honestly, Whedons run is what changed my mind about Cyclops. Imagine if he could do that for Superman.
Whedon doesn't need to 'change' Superman, he's enough of a well developed and complex character as he is. Or was Pre Flashpoint. Cyclops was already on the slippery road down to his despairing characterisation anyway so Whedon couldn't 'save' him IMO. Even Tom Breevort or some high ranking editor at Marvel expressed the open opinion on Twitter that they thought it was clear Cyclops was in the wrong and couldn't understand why fans were backing him. That says a lot about how Cyclops is being treated at Marvel.
Also has Vaughn worked at DC and Marvel before?
Wait...what? I never said Whedon need to or changed any character. I just said he changed my mind about cyclops by writing him so well. And I don't understand how cyclops was 'in the wrong' or 'on a slippery road down to his despairing characterization'? I'm talking about the astonishing x-men run cyclops...
Ummmmm no? He's one of my favorite characters, and I'm all around this board....I said "another character that is looked at as dull and boring", not a character that I think is dull and boring.
When someone says “another character that is …” that usually means that there some original, first character “that is …”. It looked a bit like you talked about Supes here.
Log in to comment