@barkins: Forgot to respond to your pm, my bad.
Its actually pretty easy. You address the ridiculous amounts of sword strikes in the replying posts. Dont view the posts as singular but rather as a collective. The two posts = one. I'll explain
- Gambler attempted to impale Barkins with a spinning 360 sword thrust. Using the momentum to parry off to the side, he followed the initial attack, twirling the hilt of his blade between his fingers before slashing at his opponent with a diagonal trajectory. Stringing his strikes together in a continuous chorus of movement slicing from left to right in hopes of disemboweling the expertly trained swordsmen.
Now no one is thinking your character was just standing there the entire time looking at birds lol. Its one reason why we never say an attack landed. You leave that up to the responding party. Think of the response not as a continuation or leap forward in time cause the beginning of the response is basically going to be a recap but from your opponents prospective, complete with what they were doing at the time. Kind of like this
- Utilizing years of martial arts training and swordsmen ship, Barkins side stepped the twirling stab. Gracefully unsheathing his blade with cultured acrobatics effortlessly redirecting the diagonal slash but unknowingly opening himself up to the back and forth follow up. The metal cutting across his abdomen. Though nonfatal, Barkins the Badass watched as a substantial amount of blood streamed from his stomach down along his jeans to the ground. Enraged he launched himself forward (this is where you as the responder progress the interaction with your counter attack or whatever).
Log in to comment