@jonny_anonymous: If you really don't understand why referring to the Nazis with the word "favorite" is inherently distasteful, I really can't help you. If you see Nazis as anything but despicable, you have some serious reevaluation to do. They may be your choice of study because of their pitiful existence and hopes to prevent something like that to ever happen again, but in no sense can they be someone's "favorite." Unless you are a holocaust denier, or perhaps a Neo-Nazi (which I doubt you are either, because you write your posts too intelligently,) I really don't see how you can disagree with me.
Okay, not for part 2. The Celts and Aztecs did certainly sacrifice humans for what they thought was impending good fortune. It was savage and misled, of course. But to compare this to genocide of entire peoples is completely ridiculous. Now for the Norse making rape a national sport, that's simply not true. To start, it's a huge misconception that most early Nords/Vikings were all warriors. MOST, and I mean most, of them were farmers and tradesmen. The select few that were warriors and went on voyages actually traded peacefully with whomever they came across. So it's not the same as genocide. Greeks killing their own children, yes. Very bad, but it still doesn't add up to systematic genocide of entire peoples. The British didn't turn half the world into slaves, it was a huge number of people, and it doesn't make it any less tragic, but it certainly wasn't half the world. Also, it wasn't actually just the British. Only about 20% of slaves were imported violently transferred to North America.
But in the end all of them are tragedies, but to say "Yea so what if Germany was corrupt" only undermines the tragedy of the Holocaust. You clearly aren't an expert on these matters, and neither am I. Really nobody on this website is, so we aren't qualified to say what was worse. But we can all agree (I hope) that all of them are tragedies, and that it's bizarre to be picking out our favorites.
Log in to comment