Would you watch Jurassic Park if dinosaurs look like this?

  • 67 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for ostyo
Ostyo

14103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Avatar image for transformers1024
Transformers1024

7603

Forum Posts

1596

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Depends on how good the trailers were.

Avatar image for masterkungfu
MasterKungFu

20773

Forum Posts

9757

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 11

dinosaurs should have scales instead

Avatar image for masterkungfu
MasterKungFu

20773

Forum Posts

9757

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 11

fishy scales

Avatar image for mandarinestro
Mandarinestro

7651

Forum Posts

4902

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Avatar image for biteme_fanboy
BiteMe-Fanboy

8951

Forum Posts

454

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Hell no. Dinosaurs never had feathers. Yes yes yes, you can throw all these so called 'scientific facts' at me, but nope, by childhood refuses to believe.

Avatar image for warlordeternal
WarlordEternal

5681

Forum Posts

1279

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#57  Edited By WarlordEternal

When it comes to feathered looks, I prefer this one for the T. Rex

No Caption Provided

Avatar image for godzilla44
godzilla44

8625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

If they still mauled people and the story was the same, absolutely. Something feathery can still be terrifying

Avatar image for granitesoldier
GraniteSoldier

12746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

There's a recent, as in the last few months, issue of I believe Scientific American that I thumbed through discussing the T-Rex and long story short when it comes to feathers the biggest opinion in the paleontologist community is that they didn't have full feathers or full feathered bodies like birds but a precursor to them. Also that only late Cratacious dinosaurs had them, not Triassic or Jurassic.

I'm no paleontologist though, so I suggest reading it. It was very interesting.

Avatar image for fallingcliffs
Fallingcliffs

5727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Some of them could have looked like that, I mean birds are descendants of dinosaurs.

Avatar image for laflux
laflux

25242

Forum Posts

2367

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

There's a recent, as in the last few months, issue of I believe Scientific American that I thumbed through discussing the T-Rex and long story short when it comes to feathers the biggest opinion in the paleontologist community is that they didn't have full feathers or full feathered bodies like birds but a precursor to them. Also that only late Cratacious dinosaurs had them, not Triassic or Jurassic.

I'm no paleontologist though, so I suggest reading it. It was very interesting.

Yea, basicially a Dinosaur called Yutrannus which was older than T-Rex but part of the same family, had feathers covering its body, and like T-Rex it was a large predator. Before then, the only know T-Rex relative that was known to have feathers was really small (dilong). Yutrannus basicially proves that Large Theropod Dinosaurs could devolop feathers, as long as they where more closely related to Birds they were related to other more archaic therepods.

As for the final part really?

The Dinosaurs that contained Birds and most people consider to have feathers, the coelurosaurians, evolved in the Jurrasic, and the first known Bird, Archaeopteryx was a late Jurassic Dinosaur. What was the name of this paper?

Avatar image for laflux
laflux

25242

Forum Posts

2367

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

As for the thread, yes I would. Feathers on a T-Rex look awesome.

Avatar image for flashback0180
flashback0180

4630

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Sure

Avatar image for namasthetu
Namasthetu

415

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

As science learns new things I expect to see those things in science fiction.

Avatar image for blade_r
Blade_R

6469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Yeah

Avatar image for mandarinestro
Mandarinestro

7651

Forum Posts

4902

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#66  Edited By Mandarinestro

@biteme_fanboy: Although I wasn't born in the 80's or 90's (I'm 17) I also watched the first Jurassic Park as a kid and loved it.

The silly problem is that, critics right now are bashing Jurassic World for being a 'dumb monster movie' because the dinosaurs aren't up to date with new discoveries :P

Avatar image for life_without_progress
life_without_progress

34034

Forum Posts

5563

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

They look cool

Avatar image for kfhrfdu_89_76k
kfhrfdu_89_76k

4320

Forum Posts

123136

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

Older than last year.

I wouldn`t, `cause it`s Jurassic park. Dinos are cool in it, of course.
But...stories about dinos are usually boring.