Would you rather remove racism entirely or have global gay equality?

I am not a fan of them because I am not homosexual myself and I cannot say that I support but I don't have anything against them. The only thing that I don't like about them is that sometimes they just act too much like they don't care about the other people. They have those homosexual movements that make you understand from miles that you have homosexual people coming straight to you or when they have that squeaky gay voice and there are just some gay people that annoy me with the way they move or act.

It does sound a little homophobic but I ain't against every single gay person,just some of them.

Outlaw religions! It would help in both cases....unfortunately it won't get me a free cookie.

Racism.

@misanthrop: You gave me an idea.

Option 2. Gay people have it a lot worse then other ethnicities do.

Yes. They are. Especially Kiwi girls. Really, really friendly. ;)

Racism ( Sorry Gays :( )

I couldn't choose. Couldn't help one group without feeling bad for not helping the other. And in that case...I don't deserve a cookie :/

My mother wants me to get a kiwi girl (since she's from New Zealand).

@monsterstomp: That honestly sounds a little oedipal.

@jaken7: What do you mean?

@monsterstomp: Umm..I'm not sure how I could make it clearer. Wantin' a Kiwi girl because your mom is a Kiwi girl. It comes off as just slightly oedipal is all.

Racism cause it effects me.

@jaken7: I just never heard that term before. I never said I wanted a kiwi girl because mom is kiwi. I said my mom wants me to get a kiwi girl. I guess part of her wants the culture to stay alive in the family.

White Kiwi? Maori? Samoan?

@bumpyboo: Just choose cookies. Let others deal with racism and LGBT issues.

.......

@sithlantern93: NEVER! They taste like societal failure!!! Also I'm watching my intake....>_>

racism

What?

I think the gays have it way tougher nowadays. Not only are they denied basic rights but a lot of them are abused both physically and emotionally. Not by the police either so there's no payoff afterwards.

@tdk_1997:

I am not a fan of them because I am not black myself and I cannot say that I support but I don't have anything against them. The only thing that I don't like about them is that sometimes they just act too much like they don't care about the other people. They had those civil rights movements that make you understand from miles that you have black people coming straight to you or when they have that their rap music and there are just some black people that annoy me with the way they move or act.

It does sound a little racist but I ain't against every single black person, just some of them.

See what I did their.

@laflux: I am seeing what you did there but the thing is that this maybe some people's opinion on black people,asian people or whatever different skin type of people you can think of. They don't get on my nerves with anything they do because they have never done almost anything wrong(not that gay people have) and they just live a normal life like normal people which they are. While homosexuals,especially male ones make gay parades in which they show to the whole world and make them see that they are gay - Good for them. But I have never seen a single hetherosexual person or a different skin type of person to arrange a parade in which he announces to the whole world that he is what he is.

That is what annoys me with homosexual people.

@tdk_1997: Heterosexual people don't need parades because they aren't persecuted for their sexual preference, and already had the right to get married to who they wanted. Gay people aren't just doing it for sh*ts and gigs and it doesn't really affect you anyway.

@i_like_swords: It doesn't get me in any way but even if they do those parades for the approval of the public that is most definitely the worst way to do it. I don't have a problem with them being able to get married or them to be taken as normal people but if they want that to happen throwing parades just to announce that they are different is not the right way to do it. Some people can't just take it and that is why they don't approve what they are and what they want.

Why not both :(

I wanna go with racism as gay marriage will happen (at least in America), but I have seen much more damage because of gay marriage being illegal than racism...

Eh, I will just have the cookie.

Honestly I'd get rid of global classism first, that's the big problem with the world. IMO

Cookies.

Get rid of racism.

I just want cookies :(

Remove racism

I don't even want the other one to happen at all.

Eat it Babylonian westerners

@cgoodness: Right, because America is the only country in the world. Forgot about that.

Remove racism entirely.

Racism easily, it causes so much more damage than homophobia.....

Remove racism.

If you removed willful ignorance you could remove both :)

Cookies

gay equality could be achieved through legislation and equal benefits and rights under the law. racism is a thought. how do you enforce thought crime. would you really want to if you could?

racism stays / vote gays

Removing one will eventually remove the other

This.

Someone had to say it..

@i_like_swords: Indeed. They all know it's true, but people fear the truth. And fear.... Fear is our ally.

I wonder how a lesbian who also belongs to a visible minority would vote.

Well God interfered because he basically made a deal (covenant) with Abraham that he wouldn't abandon his descendents (among other things), because he they were friends. Israel was surrounded by enemy nations almost constantly, and so long they kept their heads on straight, they were preserved / protected. However, they had a bad habit of breaking deals and used to worship other gods (like Ba'al or Molech), so he'd pull his protection away, and the Israelites would get screwed, ask for God to take them back, in which case he'd maneuver events to get them set free. This was pretty much the dynamic till Christ came and they kill him.

Also, you should note that slavery in Israel was nothing like the brutal skin-whipping, back-splitting, wood-flogging abusive slavery most of us identify as. It was much more a business kind of engagement, with clear terms, limited occupancy (they could only be a slave for a seven years I think, unless the slave allowed otherwise), and the owner had to provide for the slave's well-being. A slave was allowed to be released if it was discovered they were being brutalized, even by something like neglect (Bible's example was if a slave tended to a violent bull and the owner didn't warn him, and he loses an eye or something). The owner even had to give gifts to his slave after his slave-time was over, to help him get started living on his own. It wasn't like the infamous Egyptian/Babylonian/Assyrian/Southern American slavery most folks think about.

Glitchy double-post

Racism is the bigger problem, you can hide whether you are gay or not.

@lukehero: At least you get it.