Will Science ever find GOD?

@willpayton:

Be careful now. The temptation may be too much for you.

@rdclip:

Referencing Kids in the Hall = instant epic status. Bravo.

@lykopis: I believe that i was programmed to believe that i was programmed to believe that i was programmed to believe...

God will let himself being approched by science as a sign of the changing times.

@consolemaster001:

I believe it. ;P

Pose a general question to Christians on a Christian thread, get barraged with all types of accusations ranging from assumed evil intent to derailing the thread. Derail a thread with "I like kittens, I like cheese", everyone lol. Great job, guys.

You know what. Your smart :D

I like Cheese, and Green eggs and Ham. Do you?

@laflux: I like Green Eggs and Ham! For I am Sam I Am!

Thats like saying i dont think people will invent new words because i cant read or write.

hehehe

Maybe I can make green ham cupcakes with green eggs inside! =O

@warlock360: No, it's like saying science won't find the Easter Bunny, because it doesn't exist. Then again, there's more evidence for the existence of the Easter Bunny, than there is for a god.

@samimista: As am I, AweSam I am.

There's a difference between uncertainty and certainty. He's saying no one will find something because he thinks it might not exist.

@awesam: AweSam is more awesome than being awesome! =D

Yeah, free diabetes for all :DDD

=D I'll even add honey syrup as icing on top!

@warlock360: No, he's saying people won't find something, because there's absolutely no reason to even think it's real.

@awesam: Even if it came down to god being what started the big bang? A certain molecule or atom or something that sprung out first? I'm not talking omnipotence here, but his statement ruled anything out.

Scientist will never find god because he's not real, while believers need faith, Scientist need proof.

@willpayton said:

@lykopis said:

I love puppies. And green tea.

I love kittens.

Awww thats sooooo cute!!!

@ccraft: While neither "Faith" nor "Proof" are synonyms for "True".

I don't believe in spirits, or anything deemed spiritual or whatever.

Think about it this way: What is it when a person dies? It is not the cessation of their heart contractions. A person's death is the death of their brain. Their brain is responsible for controlling bodily functions, like breathing, and releasing of hormones that are in some cases crucial in helping us perpetuate our species. And the brain encapsulates everything that makes a person themselves. Their being. Their personality, memories, likes, dislikes, etc.

Now, in a couple of hundreds of years, when we do reach the technology that allows us to bring a person back to life, that is to say, to revitalize their brains, with their person to follow, they will come back exactly as they were, with their personality, memory, etc. restored. Where on earth do spirits belong in this instance?

Religion is just another one of those things created by man to enslave and control common men. And it has worked for the better part of human civilization. I myself am quite sick of it, but whatever.

They already did

Science hasn't really been a friend to creationism xD

@warlock360: He is pretty obviously talking about the big space-fairy.

Science confirms only what it defines. God, if it exists, is not (currently) understood by a set of scientific principles. Until the nature of deity is cogently and rationally defined, and agreed upon more or less universally, scientifically we would not know god if we saw it; science is not set up to identify god.

Seriously, this.

@warlock360 said:

Do you believe in Santa Claus? Do you believe that if you go to the North Pole and search every square inch, that you will find Santa Claus? I'm sure the answers are probably: NO and NO. What I'm saying is the same thing.

@ms__omega said:

@willpayton said:

@lykopis said:

I love puppies. And green tea.

I love kittens.

Awww thats sooooo cute!!!

My work here is done. =)

@willpayton: @wario1988: even if science could find God, the science believers still wouldnt believe it was God. Thats why I say science believe what they believe and I believe what I believe, just for the simple fact that I can only control the thoughts of what i think

Its highly unlikely that his existence will be proven by science

Lmao, ok i'll go there. Here. Is he still alive? No. Did he exist and create a myth about him? yes. Though of course wether he did those things or not is irrelevant.

No, because science = common sense and religion = stupidity.

Uhm -- if science were to find a god -- then there is a god. It's actually the reverse that rings more true which is already happening. People who believe in god even after learning about evolution and the universe will always believe in god.

Uhmmm, yeah, that makes no sense. If science demonstrated that a god existed, then people who understand science will believe it. That's because science is not about blind faith, it's about evidence and logic. If you have evidence and logical arguments to prove something, I will believe it.

The unfortunate irony in what you just said, but you dont realize, is that if science proved a god existed, the people who would not believe it would be religious people.

A few great scientific minds have already dabbled with the concept. It seems possible that they may find something.

I believe that if they do find God they will keep it to themselves so that the religious people in the world can never tell the Scientist... I told you so.

( + )

It already has.

An abstract idea is a science. So the thought of god exist is already there and therefore in existence.

Hey guys/gals, dont forget we have this other nifty science thread packed with all kinds of interesting stuff. Go check it out. =)

http://www.comicvine.com/forums/off-topic-5/the-science-thread-1473151/

Until someone's first name or last name is "God", I am correct. :P

Sciencel will create "God" and politics will use him as propaganda... Pretty much taking the mantel from Gods of myth and religion!

Win.

No, because God doesn't exist. Every single argument that theists have used has been refuted at one point or another. Science can't find evidence that a supreme deity doesn't exist, because there's nothing to say that he does, other than a book written 2000 years ago that's not even written by God himself. Yet people claim it as credible.

But if you believe that God exists, that's fine, I won't call you out for it. But I personally don't believe it.

So your telling me we haven't!?

I highly doubt it.

1) Are they looking for God?

2) If God can do all the stuff his PR people claim, then no. He would not be found unless he wanted to be.

3) not being any kinda of expert on the subject, but wouldn't any kind of proof negate faith? Faith being a very big deal in the religions I am familiar with?

4) Lastly, when did Atheism become about trolling believers? I'm serious here. I see it all the time on these threads. Everyone is entitled to their beliefs (or lack thereof) but acting smug and making jokes doesn't make you right.