Why is smoking cigarettes...

  • 134 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Avatar image for gymgoer205
Gymgoer205

1267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

frowned upon but eating poorly isn't?

Discuss.

Avatar image for bullpr
BullPR

6685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By BullPR

You can stop smoking.

It's a toxic.

Direct link with cancers, hearth diseases etc...

It's quite complicated to stop when you are addicted, but you don't have to start.

Nutrition it's a different story.

Avatar image for chillxpill
ChillxPill

1401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By ChillxPill

Because food can't give you cancer.

Because eating isn't unhealthy.

Because food is love.. food is life.

Avatar image for pharoh_atem
Pharoh_Atem

45284

Forum Posts

10114

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 13

@chillxpill:

Because food can't give you cancer.

Yeah...it most likely can.

Avatar image for comicace3
comicace3

12438

Forum Posts

1465

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

#5  Edited By comicace3

It increases the likelihood of getting cancer more than mosts foods. It smells bad, and it can be detrimental to your health.

Avatar image for gymgoer205
Gymgoer205

1267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@bullpr: You can stop eating poorly and many foods are toxic.

Avatar image for bullpr
BullPR

6685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@chillxpill:

Because food can't give you cancer.

Yeah...it most likely can.

No. Like really not. You have more and more studies between your microbiota (for example the commensal flora of your GI tract) and several diseases. And other studies between microbiota and type of diet.

But you won't find any nutriment associated with the cascade of cellular mutations that is the basis of any cancer.

So no. Really no.

Avatar image for deactivated-57d568743bdb8
deactivated-57d568743bdb8

469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

It shouldn't be frowned upon. Smoking is pure badassery. People should learn smoking since their breastfeeding time.

Avatar image for bullpr
BullPR

6685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By BullPR

@gymgoer205 said:

@bullpr: You can stop eating poorly and many foods are toxic.

It doesn't mean anything "stop eating poorly".

If you are hungry and you have a Big Mac menu available for less than $10, you going to buy it. No everyone can afford good TASTY and healthy food.

What do you call "toxic".

I don't know any source of nutriment that is toxic.

Avatar image for nefarious
nefarious

35828

Forum Posts

6930

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Because food can't give you breathing problems.

Avatar image for pharoh_atem
Pharoh_Atem

45284

Forum Posts

10114

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 13

@bullpr said:

@dccomicsrule2011 said:

@chillxpill:

Because food can't give you cancer.

Yeah...it most likely can.

No. Like really not. You have more and more studies between your microbiota (for example the commensal flora of your GI tract) and several diseases. And other studies between microbiota and type of diet.

But you won't find any nutriment associated with the cascade of cellular mutations that is the basis of any cancer.

So no. Really no.

...

Alrighty, then, in English please?

Avatar image for deactivated-5e3b7f04aeb74
deactivated-5e3b7f04aeb74

8695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Marketing and eating junk food isn't as bad compared to smoking.

Oh and junk food taste good.

Avatar image for deactivated-5ee15da0e0aad
deactivated-5ee15da0e0aad

8219

Forum Posts

240

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Because it isn't nice to hang out with somebody whose clothes smell like smoke, and who smokes while you're eating for example. It's annoying.

Avatar image for failswitch
FailSwitch

322

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Are we talking eating poorly as in to the point of obesity which can kill and cause everything else mentioned above (except maybe cancer, idk) or just the regular bag of chippo's?

Avatar image for bullpr
BullPR

6685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@bullpr said:

@dccomicsrule2011 said:

@chillxpill:

Because food can't give you cancer.

Yeah...it most likely can.

No. Like really not. You have more and more studies between your microbiota (for example the commensal flora of your GI tract) and several diseases. And other studies between microbiota and type of diet.

But you won't find any nutriment associated with the cascade of cellular mutations that is the basis of any cancer.

So no. Really no.

...

Alrighty, then, in English please?

Hmm. I tried to be as mainstream as I could.

-Yes, what you eat can change the composition of the bacteria that are not pathogens (=commensal) that live in your belly (=GI tract)

-Yes, these commensal bacteria play an important role in your immunity (=Host defense)

This is a very hot topic and a lot of funding is allowed to study that.

The jump to the general population that food can give cancer is not true.

A cancer is a multiplication or normal cells because the cells are mutants (like the X-men). And not only one mutation but a lot of successive ones.

No known meal has this result in a lab.

Avatar image for pharoh_atem
Pharoh_Atem

45284

Forum Posts

10114

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 13

@bullpr said:

@dccomicsrule2011 said:

@bullpr said:

@dccomicsrule2011 said:

@chillxpill:

Because food can't give you cancer.

Yeah...it most likely can.

No. Like really not. You have more and more studies between your microbiota (for example the commensal flora of your GI tract) and several diseases. And other studies between microbiota and type of diet.

But you won't find any nutriment associated with the cascade of cellular mutations that is the basis of any cancer.

So no. Really no.

...

Alrighty, then, in English please?

Hmm. I tried to be as mainstream as I could.

-Yes, what you eat can change the composition of the bacteria that are not pathogens (=commensal) that live in your belly (=GI tract)

-Yes, these commensal bacteria play an important role in your immunity (=Host defense)

This is a very hot topic and a lot of funding is allowed to study that.

The jump to the general population that food can give cancer is not true.

A cancer is a multiplication or normal cells because the cells are mutants (like the X-men). And not only one mutation but a lot of successive ones.

No known meal has this result in a lab.

Ah, si, si.

I've learned something both new and interesting today.....Thanks!

Avatar image for bullpr
BullPR

6685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for legacy6364
legacy6364

7622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Ignorance.

Avatar image for cattlebattle
cattlebattle

20985

Forum Posts

313

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Since when is smoking frowned upon?? All the celebrities and cool people do it....

Avatar image for claymore1998
Claymore1998

16580

Forum Posts

3080

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

Because it smells bad. Well at least that's my justification ^_^

Avatar image for lesterlawton
lesterlawton

1203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Food can be every bit as bad as smoking. There are a great many dangerous things that companies add to food, for the same purpose that cigarette companies add poisons to theirs. Sadly, people aren't motivated enough to educate themselves, which is ridiculous, because the information takes seconds to access. Ignorance at this point in time has become a choice.

Avatar image for gymgoer205
Gymgoer205

1267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@bullpr: With 10 dollars you could buy 3 meals worth of food. Chicken breast 2.99 a pound broccoli 2.00 a pound brown rice 2.00 32 oz. And 3 dollars to spare. Much healthier and much cheaper than 1 meal in McDonald's.

Avatar image for dernman
dernman

36143

Forum Posts

10092

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

Oh for F*cks sake. Live your own life and stay out of someone else's eating habits.

Avatar image for bullpr
BullPR

6685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@bullpr: With 10 dollars you could buy 3 meals worth of food. Chicken breast 2.99 a pound broccoli 2.00 a pound brown rice 2.00 32 oz. And 3 dollars to spare. Much healthier and much cheaper than 1 meal in McDonald's.

How do you eat the chicken breast and the broccoli if you are walking, working or other?

How easy is it to buy them?

To prepare them?

How fast would it take?

Don't rush your judgment. Obesity is a major issue and your approach is way to aggressive.

Education is key here, not the criticism and the sanctions.

The simple fact that you put at the same level Cigarette and Obesity show that you have no knowledge of the situation.

Avatar image for dernman
dernman

36143

Forum Posts

10092

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

@bullpr: Stop Stop you're getting in the way of the "health"nazi's excuse to treat people with disdain. Stop your logic and sense.

Avatar image for gymgoer205
Gymgoer205

1267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27  Edited By Gymgoer205

@bullpr:

1) Bring it to work with you.

2) It's slightly harder than ordering at McDonald's because you have to search for the foods but it's still not that hard.

3) About 20 minutes

15 to grill the chicken

5 minutes to boil the brocoli and about 15 to boil the rice.

That's assuming that you're boiling the rice and brocoli at the same time. If you aren't then it will take you a few extra minutes.

4) I agree it's a major issue but I feel that's because people are scared to speak up and just say that your obesity is your own fault. As long as we allow people to think that obesity isn't their fault I don't think that we'll ever put a stop to it.

5) I didn't compare obesity to smoking, I compared eating unhealthy eating to smoking. I stand by that statement, they're both unhealthy habits that left unchecked can lead to serious illness, and both can be stopped. I agree it's hard to quit both but it needs to be done. Imagine if people frowned upon unhealthy eating the same way they frown on the consumption of tobacco.

Avatar image for gymgoer205
Gymgoer205

1267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@averywetfrog:

1) Why aren't tobacco commercials allowed?

2) Why do many states charge high taxes on tobacco?

They're attempting to discourage the consumption of tobacco, why don't they do the same thing when it comes to unhealthy eating? Poor dietary habits kill more people than smoking according to a study conducted by the Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington.

Why is it okay to look down upon smoking, but talking about someone's poor eating habits is considered taboo?

Avatar image for bullpr
BullPR

6685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30  Edited By BullPR

@gymgoer205: If nobody answers to you, I'll come back to this later tonight.

@dernman said:

@bullpr: Stop Stop you're getting in the way of the "health"nazi's excuse to treat people with disdain. Stop your logic and sense.

:-)

Avatar image for greatcaesarsghost
GreatCaesarsGhost

3952

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Eating badly is frowned upon.

Avatar image for hudyman
hudyman

2274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32  Edited By hudyman

I knew this was a gymgoer thread just by looking at the title.

And the answer to your question is simple. Poor eaters don't have their habits clearly on display like smokers do.

Don't get me wrong, i'm not trying to say anything against smokers.

Avatar image for gymgoer205
Gymgoer205

1267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33  Edited By Gymgoer205

@hudyman: Oh man I'm Hollywood now. Have we spoken before? I'm gymgoer205.

Avatar image for artyom
Artyom

6880

Forum Posts

11

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Loading Video...

Avatar image for thetruebarryallen
TheTrueBarryAllen

13529

Forum Posts

84818

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Eating badly is frowned upon to some extent, but we must eat to survive. People are obtaining SOME benefit from the food they're consuming even if they consume too much from time to time.

Smoking cigarettes doesn't do anything positive for ones health that I know of - and they're not required in any way/shape/form to live.

So while both are bad in the grand scheme of things - eating poorly is the lesser evil, in a sense.

Avatar image for deactivated-61bde0e570bb9
deactivated-61bde0e570bb9

3110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Because eating poorly is not as visible as smoking.

Avatar image for symbioticspider-man
SymbioticSpider-Man

3595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 10

I know right? Cancer ftw!

Avatar image for gymgoer205
Gymgoer205

1267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@averywetfrog:

1) But why ban tobacco commercials and not fast food commercials when the latter causes more deaths? I don't support tobacco commercials btw.

2) Why don't they do the same thing when it come to junk food? Less people would eat it and they would eat it less often because it would be more expensive.

3) I live in the same world as you fellow human. You'd be hard pressed to find someone making excuses for a smoker but many people make excuses for people with bad diets and shame people who publicly criticize them.

Avatar image for gymgoer205
Gymgoer205

1267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41  Edited By Gymgoer205

@thetruebarryallen: How is it the lesser of two evils when more people die from unhealthy eating than smoking?

Avatar image for ariesxmasters
ariesxmasters

4886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I don't know. I really don't. Cigarets are nasty though yuck.

Avatar image for kyrees
kyrees

13625

Forum Posts

100

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43  Edited By kyrees

because smoking isn't a necessity while poor eating habits is a necessity getting out of hand.

Avatar image for patrat18
patrat18

11753

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

I smoke about 4 packs a day and i'm healthy as a Hor

Avatar image for spambot
Spambot

9727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@chillxpill: I think gmo food most definitely can and I think its already been proven to in rats.

Avatar image for bullpr
BullPR

6685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@spambot said:

@chillxpill: I think gmo food most definitely can and I think its already been proven to in rats.

No.

I know the senior author of this study (if you are referring to the one conducted in Europe a couple of years ago). The rats were a species that was able to develop tumors spontaneously and the number of animals studied was too low.

The fear about GMOs, when not rational like that, is not helping anyone.

Most of these GMOs have a just some additional genes associated with pesticide resistance. Please tell me the link between these genes in something that you are going to eat and digest and the risk of developing a cancer. How and when your own cells could be in contact with theses genes?

A magical genetic transfer??

Avatar image for retconcrisis
RetconCrisis

5593

Forum Posts

768

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47  Edited By RetconCrisis

@bullpr said:

@spambot said:

@chillxpill: I think gmo food most definitely can and I think its already been proven to in rats.

No.

I know the senior author of this study (if you are referring to the one conducted in Europe a couple of years ago). The rats were a species that was able to develop tumors spontaneously and the number of animals studied was too low.

The fear about GMOs, when not rational like that, is not helping anyone.

Most of these GMOs have a just some additional genes associated with pesticide resistance. Please tell me the link between these genes in something that you are going to eat and digest and the risk of developing a cancer. How and when your own cells could be in contact with theses genes?

A magical genetic transfer??

I agree, I don't really get all of the panic about GMO. Sure, it won't be as nutritious as organic or whole foods, but it's not going to give you cancer (unless of course you drink the chemicals in a glass). Should GMOs be able to give humans cancer, then there would certainly be a case by now. Other chemical compounds in other products that have caused cancer showed up by this time of use.

Avatar image for aquaman01
aquaman01

1948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Sigh

Avatar image for spambot
Spambot

9727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@bullpr: wow. There is a reason why the us is practically the only nation in the world that allows for the growing and consumption of gmo foods and its not because they pose no threat to your health. I am not in the mood to start linking studies and whatnot but if you want to eat gmo food then go right ahead. I'm not in the mood to play educator tonight.

Avatar image for rdclip
RDClip

2792

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Because one person eating badly doesn't give the person next to them cancer