This topic is locked from further discussion.

#1 Posted by Cybrilious4 (1766 posts) - - Show Bio

1) The prosecution had weak arguments

2) They didn't pick the best jury

3) Plain and simple, the court could not prove Zimmerman was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

Hope this helped ;)

#2 Posted by Xanni15 (6758 posts) - - Show Bio

2) Irrelevant, wouldn't have mattered. The law was on Zimmerman's side, so unless you're going to be biased people who have an agenda, the jury was fine.

#3 Posted by MysteriousUsername (1210 posts) - - Show Bio

Don't think we need 5 threads about the same case.

#4 Edited by Jean_Luc_LeBeau (84704 posts) - - Show Bio

Just gonna go ahead and lock this. There are several similar/same, threads.