#1 Posted by TJSH96 (494 posts) - - Show Bio

By intelligence I mean things like performance in scientific fields, creativity, problem solving, ease of learning, memory, the level at which they can think, intuition, imagination, originality of ideas, math skills, reasoning and other such similar things. Who is more intelligent?

#2 Posted by TJSH96 (494 posts) - - Show Bio

Albert Einstein was a brilliant theoretical physicist. So basically, could Skynet beat Albert Einstein in all-aspects of physics?

#3 Posted by Deranged Midget (17598 posts) - - Show Bio

Not a battle mate.

Moderator
#4 Posted by Bruxae (9366 posts) - - Show Bio

Skynet, Albert's intelligence was much more specialized. (I think, really dont know much about either)

#5 Posted by OmgOmgWtfWtf (6083 posts) - - Show Bio

Albert Einstein curb stomps.

#6 Edited by russellmania77 (13615 posts) - - Show Bio

idk

#7 Posted by TJSH96 (494 posts) - - Show Bio
#8 Edited by PrinceAragorn1 (14192 posts) - - Show Bio

Einstein with ease. Even skynet is nothing more than an advanced calculator..

#9 Posted by TJSH96 (494 posts) - - Show Bio

@princearagorn1:

Could you please explain in a little more detail. What is it that makes you think Albert Einstein is more intelligent than a calculator? That's what I don't understand. Could you back-up your statement with a few reasons. Your statement is very arbitrary. As far as I know, there are much more intelligences than what Albert Einstein was capable of and I think Skynet had a lot more of those intelligences, more than Albert Einstein, I think.

Also, have you heard of the technological singularity?

#10 Edited by JediXMan (27947 posts) - - Show Bio

Skynet has robots. Does Einstein have robots? No.

#11 Posted by TJSH96 (494 posts) - - Show Bio

@jedixman:

So what are you saying? That Skynet is more intelligent?

#12 Edited by DeathpooltheT1000 (9503 posts) - - Show Bio

Skynet take down mankind, over 6 billion humans, Einstein could never be as smart as 6 billion humans.

So Skynet.

#13 Posted by Pyrogram (32253 posts) - - Show Bio

skynet

#14 Posted by DH69 (4258 posts) - - Show Bio

humans think, robots computers and AI process. Therefor they cannot imagine, they cannot create an idea, and they have no intuition.

#15 Edited by Kramotz (183 posts) - - Show Bio

@dh69 said:

humans think, robots computers and AI process. Therefor they cannot imagine, they cannot create an idea, and they have no intuition.

Unless they're programmed to want to learn more and to be innovative that is. That's why we don't want to build human-like AI's today. People think they would begin to question our existence, become sentient, and then Age of Ultron would be real.

#16 Posted by guttridgeb (4831 posts) - - Show Bio

Skynet

#17 Edited by Cezar_TheScribe (2614 posts) - - Show Bio

Skynet

Einstein's theories are being debunked.

Nikola Tesla was better than Einstein.

#18 Posted by Vaeternus (8327 posts) - - Show Bio

Skynet, because of how fast it adapted, fooled the entire human race and made terminators ridiculously advanced considering the timeline of such.

Einstein for a human is smart, but also lived in a more primitive time. I think he was ahead of his time but ultimately wouldn't do much vs. skynet

#19 Posted by PowerHerc (78172 posts) - - Show Bio

Einstein.

#20 Posted by dccomicsrule2011 (21279 posts) - - Show Bio
#21 Posted by evilvegeta74 (4517 posts) - - Show Bio

Skynet they have time travel technology, there is no competition here.

#22 Edited by ssejllenrad (12780 posts) - - Show Bio

Define intelligent. Processing power? Skynet. Conceiver and pioneer of ideas? Einstein.

#23 Posted by ssejllenrad (12780 posts) - - Show Bio

Is this thread another Einstein vs Hawking debate like that epic rap battle between them? Cause I see Hawking as the head of Skynet. His voice itself is so Skynet-ish.

#24 Posted by novi_homines (1321 posts) - - Show Bio

Skynet

Einstein's theories are being debunked.

Nikola Tesla was better than Einstein.

.....you can't be serious.

#25 Posted by ssejllenrad (12780 posts) - - Show Bio

Skynet they have time travel technology, there is no competition here.

Yeah and they were dumb enough not to maximize its use. No competition with the stupidity of their mistake as well. Nyehehehehe!

#26 Edited by Cezar_TheScribe (2614 posts) - - Show Bio
#27 Edited by DeathpooltheT1000 (9503 posts) - - Show Bio

Dont matter what you say, Skynet outsmartted the mankind, this means 6 billion humans.

If every human had 1 point of iq or, it would mean Skynet outsmarted a being with an iq of 6 billion.

#28 Edited by TJSH96 (494 posts) - - Show Bio

@dh69:

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THINKING AND PROCESSING?!

I've never been able to understand that?

And aren't machines suppose to be MUCH more intelligent in every possible way?

#29 Edited by RoyalDivinity (3161 posts) - - Show Bio

The cognizance and rather limited sagacious prowess is evident here. For example: Einstein was clearly a dexterous mathematician, but he was by, no means, a genius in the area. In fact, his life long friend Marcel Grossmann was the true mathematical genius that Einstein relied upon heavily. His first wife, Mileva Maric, would often check Einstein's math and equations for possible mistakes when he was developing the theory of relativity.

There is a vast difference between being smart and being intelligent; the former possessing the knowledge, the latter with the ability to comprehend the paradox of a conundrum to adhere the solution. Understand the difference, and this thread becomes that much easier to resolve in a series of debates.

- RD

#30 Posted by theTimeStreamer (2841 posts) - - Show Bio

@tjsh96 said:

@dh69:

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THINKING AND PROCESSING?!

I've never been able to understand that?

And aren't machines suppose to be MUCH more intelligent in every possible way?

no difference. just that one is used for living being the other for machines. just so you dont have to say the pc thinks a little slower because of all the p*rn. for example.

#31 Posted by InnerSuperman (858 posts) - - Show Bio
#32 Posted by Jorgevy (5114 posts) - - Show Bio

Einstein had imagination; he wins by default, Skynet just a super AI

#33 Posted by TJSH96 (494 posts) - - Show Bio

@jorgevy:

By imagination you mean thinking about things and new, innovative ideas, right? In other words, creativity, right? Well, what makes you think Skynet lacks creativity?

And what do you mean by "just a super AI"? If an AI is advanced enough, can't it be more intelligent than a human being?

#34 Posted by Jorgevy (5114 posts) - - Show Bio

@tjsh96: to answer both of them; unless they have emotions nope. emotions are extremelly connected with creativity, imagination, thought and problem solving and to be able to be so advanced to surpass humans they need emotions, simple as that. so if the AI ofSkynet can develop that, then yeah, they are above, otherwise not

#35 Edited by VercingetorixTheGreat (2823 posts) - - Show Bio

Albert Einstein has what every human has which computers lack. Imagination and creativity. There is no thinking outside the box for a computer it is bound by logic and even then only the logic that is pre programmed into it.

I consider adaptability to be superior to pure intelligence (I mean pretty much any computer is more intelligent than a person in the sense it can solve equations easier; however, Einstein trumps in creativity the man was one of the few men to surpass all expectations through imagination.)

#36 Edited by _Cerberus_ (3436 posts) - - Show Bio

If were talking about pure mathematics Skynet with out a doubt, but in terms of creating theories Albert in a landslide