@the_new_avenger:
At last, some argument, and some of them are even interesting ! Let's see what we got.
Actual some people can't afford to pay for store meat, and some people can't eat meat from the store for medical reasons( the have cancerous property's from all the crap they feed those slaughter house animals) Also It's 10x more humane to hunt and kill an animal than what those sickos do to them in slaughter houses. ("But TheNewAvenger why don't they just buy organic meat?" " Thank you for asking it's quite simple really it cost a whole lot of money.".
Why not go vegan ? I mean, people in india have quite an habit to cook vegan food that taste as good as meat, and almost the same. With some cooking skill and knowledge, you don't even need to pay for food in specialized food store.
While slaughterhouse can be a mess, you have to note that if all humanity resorted to hunting, you couldn't even feed the USA population without making disappearing the ecosystem even faster.
I do not think guns should be just handed out, I think you should have to prove you are mentally stable and competent enough to own a gun. And I think banning guns is the most idiotic and naive thing you could do at this point.
Well, this one is quite reasonnable at first look, but in the long term, mental stability can decay, and the gun will stay with his owner.
Things that should be done:
Cooling off periods after gun and ammo purchases. ( This will prevent people from stockpiling guns and ammo)
I'm not sure. How many time between each purchase ? 1 months ? 1 years ? Yet, I concede this isn't a bad idea in the state of things.
Gun manufactures should be required to give out the proper firearm locks with the purchase of a firearm. ( This will keep kids and any other non licensed or non competent/stable people from gaining access your gun.)
Same as above. But you should really be careful, as kids are really smart those day. I've got three of them and I work with them. I even remember being one of them ! But most of the time, kids put their hands over guns because their parents are dumb, not crazy.
Under no circumstances should a civilian have access to full-auto weapons or suppressors. ( People will find a way around this illegally, just like they would with a gun ban but It should be enforced as much as possible.)
This one work quite well, here. We had some violence, but it was mostly the fact of terrorist and it doesn't happened this commonly. Anyway, I think we have a common ground, a civilian shouldn't never have access to those accessories.
Protection of "Gun Free Zone" ( Placing 2-3 of the towns trustworthy police officers on school campuses will provided the protection the school needs without having to pay for armed security, or arming the staff)
Why not ? Seems smart. I always found that arming the staff was hilariously dumb anyway and private armed security is just too costly.
You should be required to have a firearm license that proves you are competent and stable to purchase any and all guns and ammo. \
Okay, which system of control are we talking here ? Like car permit ? How often the owner would be tested again ? The idea isn't bad, but if the guy is found unable, didn't the guns need to be registered by the state at the purchase ?
But here we are to -strongly- disagree...
Reasons why a firearm BAN is the worst thing to do.
The People while not give a damn. They ill smuggle, make, and but guns illegally making the problem worse.
Not so sure about that. While I admit you have a pretty precedent with the prohibition of alcohol.
The people will riot and there ill be casualty's ( don't believe me? Go to the south ask them what would happen if a gun ban took place)
Ah the flavour of the gunpowered south !
I don't know the south so much, so I will not make the assumption that each southerner is a progun zealot, which seems quite unrealistic. But as I said earlier, america digged their own grave on the subject when they didn't renounced their gun habit after the end of the 19th century.
There are circumstances where a gun can protect and provide for you.( You would be taking the food off of some peoples table, and making it easier for the real problem which is criminals. Again if you think making guns illegal will stop people from getting guns you need help)
Not 100% sure of what you are meaning there. English is not my first language. If you're talking about employement problem, just see my answer that come a little later.
Otherwise, surely, people will get gun by their own way, like all things, people get when they want to (You know, drugs, illegal sex, etc...) and it takes to be really disconnected to reality to not foreseen that. But at least, this should really decrease the number of domestic accident.
It will dived this already divided country. ( It's already bad enough Liberals and Conservatives are to busy hating each other to get things done, this will make the problem 10x worse.)
No doubt about that, but hey, sometimes, things must be done and decision must be made. Status quo only work for Marvel and DC comics universes... and not that well. You are bound to face ths issue, unless it will come back haunt you again and again, each time more badly than the last... a little bit like slavery, in fact.
Banning guns would cost thousands of people to lose there jobs
I always loved the "employement blackmail strategy". "Don't stop this industry or you will raised unemployement !" Sorry, but this is an hideous way of thinking and obvious manipulation. Just stop the industry to put their factory oversea on the altar of taxes evasion and lower wages. It's another subject, but it's truth. "Free trade" is just another way to disaster and to put back the law of the jungle... in a global scale.
There are Pro's and Con's to having the 2nd amendment but thinking that getting rid of all the con's you are dead wrong, it would create more con's than ever before.
Once again, I'm not sure of what you mean there. Maybe it's the sentence that aren't finished, maybe it's me that doesn't fully understand. But if you mean that we could try to getting rid of all the supporter of the second amendement I would really ask you how we could doing that ? With the gun that they permit us to possess ? It wouldn't be a very constructive way of thinking and doing things ! XD
Nah, more seriously, you need to clarify this point. As much for me than for you.
In conclusion, even with difficult comprehension, I find your argument having more weight that the nonsensical video you just originally posted. I mean, this guy clearly never opened an history book and tried so much manipulating people it's an insult to me, you, and american people in general.
Next time you believe in something and think to have an argument, stop telling people they are delusional and use your owns, not those of a manipulative politician.
Log in to comment