War on Terror vs War on Drugs

Avatar image for prince_cortsether
Prince CortSether

2375

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By Prince CortSether

Ever notice how they're run practically the same and garner practically the same results? 
 

No Caption Provided
Avatar image for difficlus
difficlus

10659

Forum Posts

3482

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By difficlus

ok...

Avatar image for turoksonofstone
turoksonofstone

15045

Forum Posts

279813

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 24

#3  Edited By turoksonofstone
@Prince CortSether said:
Ever notice how they're run practically the same and garner practically the same results? 
 
No Caption Provided
Agreed.
Avatar image for jekylhyde14
Jekylhyde14

907

Forum Posts

5322

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 10

#4  Edited By Jekylhyde14

Yup. It's true.

Avatar image for cyberninja
cyberninja

10669

Forum Posts

16362

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 11

#5  Edited By cyberninja

Well that sure beats "they hate us because of our freedom" by a long shot. 

Avatar image for dracade102
Dracade102

8452

Forum Posts

12995

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: -1

#6  Edited By Dracade102

What's with the "NO EXIT" thing on the top of that picture?

Avatar image for armiv2
ARMIV2

10074

Forum Posts

15

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By ARMIV2

I'm no "expert" in any of this, but I feel that a war on drugs should be fought by people and character, not by countless organizations.

Avatar image for cyberninja
cyberninja

10669

Forum Posts

16362

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 11

#8  Edited By cyberninja
@Dracade102 said:
What's with the "NO EXIT" thing on the top of that picture?
It means that both War On Terror & War On Drugs don't have exit strategy. 
Avatar image for raineffect
RainEffect

3376

Forum Posts

1377

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 2

#9  Edited By RainEffect
@Prince CortSether: And what would you suggest we do instead? Sit there and just let them run free?
Avatar image for ebbm
Ebbm

1171

Forum Posts

67

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#10  Edited By Ebbm

@cyberninja said:

Well that sure beats "they hate us because of our freedom" by a long shot.

more like, "THEY HATE US FUR R FREEDUMBZ!!!11!!!"

Avatar image for cyberninja
cyberninja

10669

Forum Posts

16362

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 11

#11  Edited By cyberninja
@Ebbm said:

@cyberninja said:

Well that sure beats "they hate us because of our freedom" by a long shot.

more like, "THEY HATE US FUR R FREEDUMBZ!!!11!!!"

Well said my friend. 
Avatar image for prince_cortsether
Prince CortSether

2375

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@RainEffect said:
@Prince CortSether: And what would you suggest we do instead? Sit there and just let them run free?
I suggest we legalize drugs and let people make their own choices.
 
And if we really wanted to do something about our national security because of terrorists, here's an idea, withdraw from all our bases around the world and bring our troops back home. How does protecting national security make sense if the majority of our military is in other countries and our borders are left mostly unprotected?
Avatar image for difficlus
difficlus

10659

Forum Posts

3482

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13  Edited By difficlus

@Prince CortSether said:

@RainEffect said:
@Prince CortSether: And what would you suggest we do instead? Sit there and just let them run free?
I suggest we legalize drugs and let people make their own choices. And if we really wanted to do something about our national security because of terrorists, here's an idea, withdraw from all our bases around the world and bring our troops back home. How does protecting national security make sense if the majority of our military is in other countries and our borders are left mostly unprotected?

its not as easy as that..

illegal drugs are demerit goods.

Avatar image for cascadeking09
cascadeking09

6877

Forum Posts

3546

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#15  Edited By cascadeking09

@turoksonofstone said:

@Prince CortSether said:
Ever notice how they're run practically the same and garner practically the same results?

No Caption Provided
Agreed.

And cosigned

Avatar image for raineffect
RainEffect

3376

Forum Posts

1377

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 2

#16  Edited By RainEffect
@Prince CortSether said:
@RainEffect said:
@Prince CortSether: And what would you suggest we do instead? Sit there and just let them run free?
I suggest we legalize drugs and let people make their own choices.  And if we really wanted to do something about our national security because of terrorists, here's an idea, withdraw from all our bases around the world and bring our troops back home. How does protecting national security make sense if the majority of our military is in other countries and our borders are left mostly unprotected?
Just to clear up, I'm not American - I'm Australian, so I'm giving an outsiders opinion. 
 
Certain drugs are illegal because they are a massive health risk. People do immense damage to themselves and pose a danger to the people around them - that is why they are illegal; for the safety of the user and people around. If we just let everyone do what they wanted, we would have 20% of Western society crocked up on Ice and other horrific drugs, which would then lead to increases in crimes such as assaults and robberies. To put it into terms a comic-book reader will understand - do you really want an Arkham City in your neighbourhood?
 
As for the War on Terror. It was my understanding that the War on Terror was a retaliation for the September 11 attacks. It is also the responsibility of the United States, being the most powerful country in the world, to be the police state and ensure that peace is upheld throughout countries that can't police themselves. The US is in Afghanistan because it has become a breeding ground of civilian bombings and guerrilla training camps. The Afghan Government is either too corrupt or too weak to be able to combat this, so it is the responsibility of the United States to help out. 
 
Think about it this way, should the United States just shrug their shoulders and do nothing whilst Gaddafi orders airstrikes on innocent civilian protestors? No. It's their responsibility, as the most powerful military force in the world, to ensure that travesties such as that are stopped. 
 
Fact: People think that NATO is responsible for all these civilian deaths in the Middle-East. At least every second day a marketplace or social structure is bombed by a suicide bomber. That is where the civilian deaths are occurring.
Avatar image for cyberninja
cyberninja

10669

Forum Posts

16362

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 11

#17  Edited By cyberninja
@RainEffect said:
@Prince CortSether said:
@RainEffect said:
@Prince CortSether: And what would you suggest we do instead? Sit there and just let them run free?
I suggest we legalize drugs and let people make their own choices.  And if we really wanted to do something about our national security because of terrorists, here's an idea, withdraw from all our bases around the world and bring our troops back home. How does protecting national security make sense if the majority of our military is in other countries and our borders are left mostly unprotected?
Just to clear up, I'm not American - I'm Australian, so I'm giving an outsiders opinion. 
 
Certain drugs are illegal because they are a massive health risk. People do immense damage to themselves and pose a danger to the people around them - that is why they are illegal; for the safety of the user and people around. If we just let everyone do what they wanted, we would have 20% of Western society crocked up on Ice and other horrific drugs, which would then lead to increases in crimes such as assaults and robberies. To put it into terms a comic-book reader will understand - do you really want an Arkham City in your neighbourhood?
 
As for the War on Terror. It was my understanding that the War on Terror was a retaliation for the September 11 attacks. It is also the responsibility of the United States, being the most powerful country in the world, to be the police state and ensure that peace is upheld throughout countries that can't police themselves. The US is in Afghanistan because it has become a breeding ground of civilian bombings and guerrilla training camps. The Afghan Government is either too corrupt or too weak to be able to combat this, so it is the responsibility of the United States to help out. 
 
Think about it this way, should the United States just shrug their shoulders and do nothing whilst Gaddafi orders airstrikes on innocent civilian protestors? No. It's their responsibility, as the most powerful military force in the world, to ensure that travesties such as that are stopped. 
 
Fact: People think that NATO is responsible for all these civilian deaths in the Middle-East. At least every second day a marketplace or social structure is bombed by a suicide bomber. That is where the civilian deaths are occurring.
Just worry about Carbon tax and leave the world politics to the big boys, mmmkay?
Avatar image for raineffect
RainEffect

3376

Forum Posts

1377

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 2

#18  Edited By RainEffect
@cyberninja said:
@RainEffect said:
@Prince CortSether said:
@RainEffect said:
@Prince CortSether: And what would you suggest we do instead? Sit there and just let them run free?
I suggest we legalize drugs and let people make their own choices.  And if we really wanted to do something about our national security because of terrorists, here's an idea, withdraw from all our bases around the world and bring our troops back home. How does protecting national security make sense if the majority of our military is in other countries and our borders are left mostly unprotected?
Just to clear up, I'm not American - I'm Australian, so I'm giving an outsiders opinion. 
 
Certain drugs are illegal because they are a massive health risk. People do immense damage to themselves and pose a danger to the people around them - that is why they are illegal; for the safety of the user and people around. If we just let everyone do what they wanted, we would have 20% of Western society crocked up on Ice and other horrific drugs, which would then lead to increases in crimes such as assaults and robberies. To put it into terms a comic-book reader will understand - do you really want an Arkham City in your neighbourhood?
 
As for the War on Terror. It was my understanding that the War on Terror was a retaliation for the September 11 attacks. It is also the responsibility of the United States, being the most powerful country in the world, to be the police state and ensure that peace is upheld throughout countries that can't police themselves. The US is in Afghanistan because it has become a breeding ground of civilian bombings and guerrilla training camps. The Afghan Government is either too corrupt or too weak to be able to combat this, so it is the responsibility of the United States to help out. 
 
Think about it this way, should the United States just shrug their shoulders and do nothing whilst Gaddafi orders airstrikes on innocent civilian protestors? No. It's their responsibility, as the most powerful military force in the world, to ensure that travesties such as that are stopped. 
 
Fact: People think that NATO is responsible for all these civilian deaths in the Middle-East. At least every second day a marketplace or social structure is bombed by a suicide bomber. That is where the civilian deaths are occurring.
Just worry about Carbon tax and leave the world politics to the big boys, mmmkay?
LOL. 
 
I should be pissed off, but I'm laughing. That was hilarious. I miss Kevin Rudd - our government's a mess.
Avatar image for turoksonofstone
turoksonofstone

15045

Forum Posts

279813

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 24

#19  Edited By turoksonofstone
@RainEffect:   
Avatar image for raineffect
RainEffect

3376

Forum Posts

1377

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 2

#20  Edited By RainEffect
@turoksonofstone said:

@RainEffect:   

This was amazing
 
I need to hack into Q&A time in Parliament and stream this video.