• 59 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

#1 Edited by Qpzmg (976 posts) - - Show Bio

If there was a 3rd World War between this countries who would win. No nuclear missles. Takes place in Tanzania.

#2 Posted by Xanni15 (6758 posts) - - Show Bio

Even together Russia and China lose.

#3 Posted by Qpzmg (976 posts) - - Show Bio

Why

#4 Posted by AmazingScrewOnHead (715 posts) - - Show Bio

Americas army is full of cowards and and they are poorly trained compared to the likes of China and Russia

Wars are won by men not weapons.

#5 Posted by ghost_rider1 (3618 posts) - - Show Bio

USA is the most powerful military in the world. I know this for a fact. In terms of technology we are by far the best with russia being the second. China has the largest military in the world with the USA as second largest. Russia has like the 5th largest. I can't remember. And at the same time it would depends on where this war is being fought at. If its in America then we win in a stomp. If we are overseas then it'll be difficult. But we would still win.

#6 Posted by ghost_rider1 (3618 posts) - - Show Bio
@AmazingScrewOnHead

Americas army is full of cowards and and they are poorly trained compared to the likes of China and Russia

Wars are won by men not weapons.

U sound ignorant and stupid...I was a marine and we are not poorly trained....why do u suppose america has never lost a war. The vietnam war wasn't a lost by the way
#7 Posted by czarny_samael666 (17174 posts) - - Show Bio
@Xanni15 said:

Even together Russia and China lose.

#8 Edited by Strider92 (16833 posts) - - Show Bio

In all out war? Probably America they have too many resources at their disposal. However if this was a soldier on soldier comparison i'd go with Russia.

#9 Posted by Qpzmg (976 posts) - - Show Bio

Takes place in Tanzania

#10 Posted by ghost_rider1 (3618 posts) - - Show Bio
@Strider92

In all out war? Probably America they have too many resources at their disposal. However if this was a soldier on soldier comparison i'd go with Russia.

I disagree...because if its just soldiers then china will probably bwin because of their vast numbers. China has over 2 million soldiers. America has over 1 million and russia have a few hundred thousand. If we was to use manpower and manpower alone. Russia will be the first to go
#11 Edited by Strider92 (16833 posts) - - Show Bio

@ghost_rider1: You misinterpreted what I was saying. What I was saying was if man-power was equal and this was an equal amount of troupes i'd go with the Russians.

#12 Posted by BigCimmerian (8839 posts) - - Show Bio

Russia for the win.

#13 Posted by ghost_rider1 (3618 posts) - - Show Bio
@Strider92

@ghost_rider1: You misinterpreted what I was saying. What I was saying was if man-power was equal and this was an equal amount of troupes i'd go with the Russians.

My apologies
#14 Posted by ghost_rider1 (3618 posts) - - Show Bio
@Qpzmg
Takes place in Tanzania
What continent is tanzania located?
#15 Posted by DCsuperman0007 (515 posts) - - Show Bio

@ghost_rider1: the usa has more reserves then china over all we could send more men then they could.

#16 Edited by JamesKM716 (1995 posts) - - Show Bio

Russia... or possibly China.

#17 Posted by justsomecoolguy (26 posts) - - Show Bio

@ghost_rider1: lols i love ur reply so true

#18 Posted by Strider92 (16833 posts) - - Show Bio

@ghost_rider1 said:

@Qpzmg
Takes place in Tanzania
What continent is tanzania located?

It's in Northern Africa I believe.

#19 Posted by Hksaru (463 posts) - - Show Bio

The U.S. is at another level technologically, like Iron Man vs. Green Goblin.

@AmazingScrewOnHead said:

Americas army is full of cowards and and they are poorly trained compared to the likes of China and Russia

Wars are won by men not weapons.

Extraordinary individuals and groups could be considered unique weapons themselves. However in regards to the large scale of things...

#20 Posted by thanobomb1124 (2020 posts) - - Show Bio

USA,USA,USA

#21 Posted by ChaosMarvel (1000 posts) - - Show Bio

@Strider92 said:

In all out war? Probably America they have too many resources at their disposal. However if this was a soldier on soldier comparison i'd go with Russia.

This. In a war now America would win due to its money and resources. However if resources and troupes were equalized Russia would win.

#22 Posted by Bawlsz (31 posts) - - Show Bio

I'd say America because I think they have better Air force and Navy, the Air force is a huge asset in modern war, and the US has the best.

OT but what is USA's elite special forces? is it the Navy SEALS or Delta? The British have the SAS and the Russians have Spetsnaz, just asking out of curiosity.

#23 Posted by ghost_rider1 (3618 posts) - - Show Bio
@DCsuperman0007

@ghost_rider1: the usa has more reserves then china over all we could send more men then they could.

Yea we have a lot more reserves. But I never took that into consideration when I did my research on other powerful militaries back when I was marine. Idk if our numbers surpass theirs even with our reserves. They had a lot of reserves also when I looked at it
#24 Posted by Immortal777 (7735 posts) - - Show Bio

@Hksaru: Those are some of the bravest horses I have ever seen.

#25 Posted by WillPayton (9821 posts) - - Show Bio

US could solo. Russia and China combined have much more manpower, but in an all out war using weapons like daisy cutters, air superiority, and drones and missiles, that manpower will disappear real quick.

Also, this breaks the battles forum rules. An admin might lock or move this.

#26 Edited by Strider92 (16833 posts) - - Show Bio

@Bawlsz said:

OT but what is USA's elite special forces? is it the Navy SEALS or Delta? The British have the SAS and the Russians have Spetsnaz, just asking out of curiosity.

Delta is America's SF. They are basically copies of the S.A.S with a few other elements thrown in.

#27 Posted by GhostRider2 (3577 posts) - - Show Bio

@Bawlsz: i think navy seals(im not american).

#28 Posted by ghost_rider1 (3618 posts) - - Show Bio
@JamesKM716

Russia... or possibly China.

Russia has twenty million soldiers in reserve. America has like one million, China has one million active right now, they could easily get more.

What????!!!! No Russia don't have twenty million reservist....OMG! China and America has more reservist than Russia. Plz do some research first.
#29 Posted by Joygirl (19951 posts) - - Show Bio

USA should probably take this, unless we get zerg rushed by a zillion soldiers, but I think we should be able to figure out a way. Far better resources.

#30 Edited by Strider92 (16833 posts) - - Show Bio

@Joygirl said:

USA should probably take this, unless we get zerg rushed by a zillion soldiers, but I think we should be able to figure out a way. Far better resources.

Meuh just 4-gate the hell out of them! Or DT rush them......wait what?

#31 Posted by WillPayton (9821 posts) - - Show Bio

@Strider92 said:

@Bawlsz said:

OT but what is USA's elite special forces? is it the Navy SEALS or Delta? The British have the SAS and the Russians have Spetsnaz, just asking out of curiosity.

Delta is America's SF. They are basically copies of the S.A.S with a few other elements thrown in.

US has different special forces for different missions. Delta is counter-terrorism. Then there's Green Berets, Navy SEALS, and Army Rangers.

#32 Posted by ghost_rider1 (3618 posts) - - Show Bio
@Bawlsz

I'd say America because I think they have better Air force and Navy, the Air force is a huge asset in modern war, and the US has the best.

OT but what is USA's elite special forces? is it the Navy SEALS or Delta? The British have the SAS and the Russians have Spetsnaz, just asking out of curiosity.

Anerica has a lot of special forces....GREEN BERETS, DELTA FORCE, NAVY SEALS, MARSOC, FORCE RECON, RANGERS, and I can't even name them all...lol
#33 Posted by AmazingScrewOnHead (715 posts) - - Show Bio

@ghost_rider1: I sound ignorant and stupid??? Yet you say that America won Vietnam, you are a prime example of the stereotypical American idiot, Your country has lost plenty of wars mate

the war of 1812 (we fought against you for a stalemate)

the mexican-american war

the civil war

the indian wars

the spanish american war

invasion of grenada ( after you guys abandoned them)

invasion of panama

And the War on Terror (will be lost obviously)

#34 Edited by Strider92 (16833 posts) - - Show Bio

Oh boy here comes the flame war:

please take care of this before it gets out of hand!

#35 Posted by Lvenger (21181 posts) - - Show Bio

Oh good we're speculating who wins in an another apocalyptic world war. Just what the battle forums needed.

#36 Posted by ghost_rider1 (3618 posts) - - Show Bio
@AmazingScrewOnHead

I'm not gonna bother replying to u...believe what u want my friend
#37 Posted by Batnandez (511 posts) - - Show Bio

@ghost_rider1 said:

@AmazingScrewOnHead

Americas army is full of cowards and and they are poorly trained compared to the likes of China and Russia

Wars are won by men not weapons.

U sound ignorant and stupid...I was a marine and we are not poorly trained....why do u suppose america has never lost a war. The vietnam war wasn't a lost by the way

lol if it makes you feel better, but that was a loss

#38 Posted by ghost_rider1 (3618 posts) - - Show Bio
@Batnandez

@ghost_rider1 said:

@AmazingScrewOnHead

Americas army is full of cowards and and they are poorly trained compared to the likes of China and Russia

Wars are won by men not weapons.

U sound ignorant and stupid...I was a marine and we are not poorly trained....why do u suppose america has never lost a war. The vietnam war wasn't a lost by the way

lol if it makes you feel better, but that was a loss

No because we never declared war on North Vietnam. We were helping and supporting South Vietnam. But eventually we pulled out the war...it doesn't go down as a lost. If u wanna call it that then u can. I'm saying this from the research I've done on the vietnam war. We lost 58,156 soldiers while North Vietnam lost over 2 million....just putting some numbere in here. If america declared war on vietnam and wanted to win that badly. We would have surely done so
#39 Posted by PlasticBag (1222 posts) - - Show Bio

@Lvenger said:

Oh good we're speculating who wins in an another apocalyptic world war. Just what the battle forums needed.

#40 Posted by Jayfournines (4024 posts) - - Show Bio

@AmazingScrewOnHead said:

@ghost_rider1: I sound ignorant and stupid??? Yet you say that America won Vietnam, you are a prime example of the stereotypical American idiot, Your country has lost plenty of wars mate

the war of 1812 (we fought against you for a stalemate)

the mexican-american war

the civil war

the indian wars

the spanish american war

invasion of grenada ( after you guys abandoned them)

invasion of panama

And the War on Terror (will be lost obviously)

the US lost the mexican-american war? AHAHAHAHAHAHA....no.

#41 Posted by quatro_briefs (384 posts) - - Show Bio

In raping underaged girls overseas? I give it to the USA!

#42 Posted by Immortal777 (7735 posts) - - Show Bio

@AmazingScrewOnHead said:

@ghost_rider1: I sound ignorant and stupid??? Yet you say that America won Vietnam, you are a prime example of the stereotypical American idiot, Your country has lost plenty of wars mate

the war of 1812 (we fought against you for a stalemate)

the mexican-american war

the civil war

the indian wars

the spanish american war

invasion of grenada ( after you guys abandoned them)

invasion of panama

And the War on Terror (will be lost obviously)

What?

#43 Posted by SHAZAM117 (3823 posts) - - Show Bio

Oui vey, this thread ...*facepalm*

#44 Posted by JamesKM716 (1995 posts) - - Show Bio

@AmazingScrewOnHead said:

the war of 1812 (we fought against you for a stalemate)

Stalemated

the mexican-american war

Won, we got Texas and other places.

the civil war

How do you lose a war when you're on both sides?

the indian wars

You mean the Great Plains War? Where we rounded up the Indians and stuck them in Oklahoma?

the spanish american war

Treaty of Paris, favorable to America

And the War on Terror (will be lost obviously)

How is that going to be lost?

We've definitely not won every war, not trying to say we did. (you listed some i honestly don't know)

#45 Posted by Jayfournines (4024 posts) - - Show Bio

I always find it iffy when people who did not fight in wars say something like "we won". Nothing wrong with it, just a pet peeve of mine. >__<

#46 Posted by ghost_rider1 (3618 posts) - - Show Bio
@Jayfournines

Plz don't respond to him...he gonna create a flame war in this thread...its not needed so just overlook and ignore
#47 Edited by KnightRise (4762 posts) - - Show Bio

@AmazingScrewOnHead said:

Americas army is full of cowards and and they are poorly trained

Find a door. Use it.

#48 Posted by KingAres109 (1328 posts) - - Show Bio

China and Russia in a curbstomp.And I say this purley because America we cant deal with loses.And I mean men we will lose in a war.Now while Russia and China can keep throwing men and not be fazed,us Americans will start to think and worry about losing alot of men.Vietnam already proves Amercicans cant deal with alot of men being lost.Now,if our country goes war thinking we want to win at all cost reguardless of men being lost then we win in a BIG curbstomp.You have to consider the 2 countries their going up aganist.China and Russia would keeo coming reguardless of men being thrown at.Now some of you wont agree with me.But look at it from a different point.Think of it,we have Americans complaining of the War in Iraq right now.Think of WWIII.Its not Iraq or Vietnam.China will and Russia will go hard on America,and the other.Now,if we werent concern with losing men,then America in the biggest stomp.But we have to consider it.China and Russia think of wnning.America think of men.(Now if America was bloodlusted then yeah!LOL)

#49 Posted by ghost_rider1 (3618 posts) - - Show Bio
@JamesKM716

The only war I can say we didn't win is the vietnam war even tho it didn't go down as a lost either. And also the korean war which ended in a seize fire or stalemate, and we fought against North Korea and China at the same time and both of them have extremely powerful militaries
#50 Posted by SHAZAM117 (3823 posts) - - Show Bio

The "butt-hurtness" from this thread could be stuff of legend