This isn't a troll thread. Before you say "Undertaker is a loser who does fake wrestling" that's not true. He was doing wrestling back in the WWF, when it wasn't rigged. The moves in WWE are real. If Bruce and Undertaker were in a street fight, who do you think would win?
The Undertaker vs. Bruce Lee
Depends how many chairs and ladders are in the street. Also how many people are watching. Also how much undertaker is getting paid.
Bruce Lee beats any human being. Undertaker included.
But Taker ain't human, hes undead.
@dreadpool10: The fight is IRL.
@marvete_e_dcnauta: I was kidding.
'Taker tosses him around like a ragdoll. The reach and size difference is just too much for Bruce to overcome.
@peakekyle said:
This isn't a troll thread. Before you say "Undertaker is a loser who does fake wrestling" that's not true. He was doing wrestling back in the WWF, when it wasn't rigged. The moves in WWE are real. If Bruce and Undertaker were in a street fight, who do you think would win?
It was always rigged. If you don't realize this then you are just either in denial or haven't read or seen enough to know otherwise. It was all rigged and scripted going back to the beginning of WWF.
That's the reason why we have weight classes in professional fighting...because speed and skill beat size and strength?
LAL. A 200 pound and nearly foot size difference is far too much to overcome for an over-hyped fighter fighter like Lee, especially given the fact that 'Taker is actually a decent fighter, sporting great strength feats and is a phenomenal athlete.
Depends how many chairs and ladders are in the street. Also how many people are watching. Also how much undertaker is getting paid.
I think your getting Lee confused with Jackie Chan. Bruce Lee's hands could be bound, and he could still kick him into submission.
@hopeonfire: The joke here was that undertaker gets paid to win.
Why do people talk about Bruce like he's an unbeatable god? He was a great martial artist but far from the best, fighting is like Rock, Paper, Siscissors, just because A can beat B & B can beat C doesn't mean A can beat C. Bruce was good not perfect.
Tombstone Piledriver, GG.
Or even the Last Ride, tbh...
That's the reason why we have weight classes in professional fighting...because speed and skill beat size and strength?
LAL. A 200 pound and nearly foot size difference is far too much to overcome for an over-hyped fighter fighter like Lee, especially given the fact that 'Taker is actually a decent fighter, sporting great strength feats and is a phenomenal athlete.
"Over-hyped" doesn't even begin to describe it. The dude was an actor who never fought a professional fight in his life.
threads like these make me feel like most of you are really young teenagers that have never see many fights in your lives.
Bruce Lee himself has said that you're already at a disadvantage if you're smaller than your opponent. Get off that High horse you're riding son; there is weight classes for a reason.
A prime Maywheather and Pac-Man together would get their sh!t pushed by an old, washed up, current Mike Tyson.
Just go to youtube and look at videos of big guys losing to little guys.
And majority of it is, unskilled morons beating other unskilled morons. I could also post videos showing the opposite as well if we want to go that route.
you all act like its some impossible feat lol cmon guys.
Never said it was impossible - but you're certainly at a major disadvantage.
That's the reason why we have weight classes in professional fighting...because speed and skill beat size and strength?
LAL. A 200 pound and nearly foot size difference is far too much to overcome for an over-hyped fighter fighter like Lee, especially given the fact that 'Taker is actually a decent fighter, sporting great strength feats and is a phenomenal athlete.
"Over-hyped" doesn't even begin to describe it. The dude was an actor who never fought a professional fight in his life.
Yet, he still viewed as the G.O.A.T by many...
@dccomicsrule2011: disadvantage does not equal losing son.
@dccomicsrule2011: disadvantage does not equal losing son.
Bruce Lee is not skilled enough to circumvent the size advantage here, so yes, it does.
@dccomicsrule2011: disadvantage does not equal losing son.
Bruce Lee is not skilled enough to circumvent the size advantage here, so yes, it does.
i meant in general.....
@dccomicsrule2011: disadvantage does not equal losing son.
Bruce Lee is not skilled enough to circumvent the size advantage here, so yes, it does.
i meant in general.....
Please, point to me when I ever said it did?
@dccomicsrule2011: disadvantage does not equal losing son.
Bruce Lee is not skilled enough to circumvent the size advantage here, so yes, it does.
i meant in general.....
Please, point to me when I ever said it did?
i didnt say you did.
An actor pretending to be a fighter vs a fighter pretending to be a actor............geez i wonder who wins
Neither are real fighters. The closest thing either have to real combat experience is Undertaker's BJJ black belt. Combine that with his insane size advantage and this is an obvious stomp.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment