So... the Republicans shut down the government!

Avatar image for vaeternus
Vaeternus

9558

Forum Posts

3

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#601  Edited By Vaeternus

@ cuddlebear

@kingjohn, I see what you guys mean now lol.

@ willpayton, Yeah dude because "infowars, dailybeats, newsbusters, fox, chimpmania, paul and naturalsolutions and washington post" are totally all the same company. Because they all have a similar title?? wow...Hey, i guess all the new 52 comics from dc are "all the same thing" right since they all say "new 52" on the cover then? ;)

So you won't admit that obama tried to shut down rush? I guess I magically made up all those google links.

Yeah, bs that's actually the truth but you can call it that if you wish :) and you're clearly choosing to ignore the part that says "YOU WILL REGRET THIS" but that's fine, yeah so sure your post is the official email, funny how certain parts seemed left out. Believe what you want dude, it's cool. I posted various links but according to you they're "all the same because they have similar titles" lmao@ that...

Avatar image for diredrill
DireDrill

2483

Forum Posts

26

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@vaeternus: Wow, just wow.

Not only are you big hypocrite for using Public Transportation, you have no ability to discern satire. When you see clips of Stephen Colbert do you really believe he is a Republican like George Bush' staff did when they invited him to White House? That is hilarious! Do you really think that I have any issues with using Public Transportation over Driving? Did I seriously convince you of that? No wonder Fox News has such a hold on you, you'll believe anything someone says if it is shouted loudly enough.

I see now the problem here, you live in one of the most liberal cities in America so you only see new forms of socialism as socialism not the ridiculous amount of socialism that you benefit from every day. Have you never left the Den of Evil that is New York and seen the heart of the Republican Party and Tea Party? See, I have I live in Dallas, Texas. Did you know that Dallas has Public Transportation but many of its suburbs do not? Do you want to know why? Republicans have consistently voted it down because they don't want the Public Transportation. How do I know Republicans are the ones doing it? Simple, Republican candidates have won more elections when Public Transit is on the ballot. Many of those suburbs desperately need Public Transportation because of the ridiculous amount of traffic congestion in Dallas. A stronger public transportation network would decrease congestion and likely increase business to some of the more congested areas. But building that would force a tax increase and no Republican is ever going to approve of that. Do you want to know the biggest argument against public transportation made here beyond the obvious tax increase? Public Transportation attracts homeless people. The people of Dallas suburbs don't want to pay for something because they are worried it will attract the homeless. You ride it every day, how many homeless people do you see on a day to day basis? So, why are the Republicans here lying about something that could benefit so many people? Real Republicans, who are by your own definition the only real form of American, hate public transportation. You don't get to complain about a new form of government intrusion when you so ridiculously benefit from another form. This is as bad as that video of Romney's mom saying they were on welfare. This is why you are a hypocrite. This is why most Republicans are hypocrites.

Also, where were my citations on the differences between the ACA and Romneycare? Did you forget? Well make sure you have them next time. That article you included had nothing but words that Obama and Romney have said. I wanted specific passages from the ACA that are in direct contradiction of Romneycare. When you provide those to me, we have a ball game until then Concession Accepted.

Do you not choose to live every day like I choose to get in my car and drive to work? There is nothing stopping you from just killing yourself, you said so previously. I didn't choose to pay for insurance it was required of me. As I said before, my area is not covered by any public transportation and my place of work is too far for me to walk so if I don't drive, I don't work. So because I have no choice but to drive in order to feed my family, I have to buy insurance. Thankfully, the compulsory auto insurance laws have brought down the cost of insurance dramatically. Something you don't understand is that the Affordable Care Act is all about providing choice something you seem to enjoy. When the Compulsory Auto Insurance Laws came to Texas, a new company was formed. Safe Auto Insurance that provided the legally required amount of insurance for bargain basement prices. This company would not have existed had there not been a need for insurance created by this law. This law created more choice for where to go to get auto insurance that would not have existed before. Choice can only exist if there are reasonable options, without reasonable options choice is just a rat in a maze.

Avatar image for kingjohnrocks
Kingjohnrocks

2295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#603  Edited By Kingjohnrocks

@kingjohnrocks:

I am 28 and I have been paying for an individual health care plan for 3 years, my premium was $185 when I started. It is now $179 as of the start of the Affordable Care Act. Please continue telling me how my premium went up %50.

I worked for Kroger (They sell groceries) between the years of 2005 and 2011. In 2007, Kroger had a policy in place that they would not schedule anyone over 32 hours a week unless they had 5 years seniority. Party City my current employer has a policy that they don't schedule associates more than 24 hours a week which has been in place since my boss started there 12 years ago. Please tell me how companies are just now screwing over employees hours.

Several of my university's professors have told me that they only include certain textbooks on the syllabus because the university makes them because they receive kickbacks from the publishers. I know this to be true because they never once used them during the course. Please tell me how Universities aren't always screwing people over.

What you are seeing here are opportunist businesses using this law to make a buck. They learned from Chick-Fil-A that if you take a ridiculous stand, idiot Republicans will just eat that up and give you a nice quarter. Maybe you should read that last article you posted the one about the Bakery. In that article they cite a survey that stated that 90% of businesses said that they were not going to make any changes in their scheduling due to the ACA. Thank you for posting an article that outright contradicts your entire point. Good job!

Again, compulsory auto insurance has lead to massive reduction in premiums over the last 30 years. Let's see if this government intrusion can do the same. People complained about compulsory auto insurance as well and see how that worked out.

@vaeternus:

Thanks for taking the time to click the easy to use reply button and spell my name correctly! It is such a courteous act.

You don't drive? What kind of American are you? So instead of driving you use Public Transportation (Nice try using the abbreviation PT to hide your shame)! You are the worst American ever. If Limbaugh or Hannity or Glenn Beck or Alex Jones

ever saw you using the devil's tunnels, they would immediately declare you a socialist communist who is destroying America. How dare you bandy the ideas of the Republican Party about when you suck from the teat of Bloomberg. You are the worst American I have ever seen. So you choose to spend your money on a socialized form of transportation that your taxes paid to build in the first place? Jeez, how do you not just rage and rage about it? How do you live with yourself? You are the very definition of Hypocrisy and as such nothing you say is of any value.

Explain the differences between Romneycare and the Affordable Care Act without mentioning how one applies to a country and one applies to a state. Afterall, Governors of States have no power to govern other states. I would also like you to cite the specific passages in the ACA that differ from Romneycare. When you inevitably can't, I'll accept your concession.

Apples and Oranges? Car Insurance deals with your car's health, Health insurance deals with your health. They are both forms of insurance and thus follow the same basic principles. One is compulsory and now the other is compulsory. They were both Republican Ideas started in the state of Massachusetts. Do I need to go on?

See how ridiculous it is when you ask ridiculous questions that all have a singular purpose because that is what you and yyoour cohorts have been doing for most of the thread. It is a stupid way to make a point so please stop doing it. Would it not have been simpler for me to just say what I mean?

@edamame:

This is untrue, health care costs are set by the specific hospitals Chargemaster and they differ from hospital to hospital even in the same region for the same things. What insurance companies do is negotiate lower prices, generally around 30% of the hospital's price for the item. I posted this article that details the ins and outs of the health care industry that explains just how messed up it is. Read it and you'll understand why the Affordable Care Act is needed.

You probably aren't in my state, where premiums have gone up 50.7% for TWENTY SEVEN and FIFTY year olds. Plus, people like you, the young and healthy (assuming you're healthy) will have to pay for someone else's health insurance. Do you really want to do that? Secondly, individuals are now REQUIRED by law to buy health insurance. What if they don't need it? What if they're healthy? Oh, and there's a penalty.

On Twitter a few weeks ago, the Washington Examiner's Justin Green asked why it was such a big deal to delay the individual mandate. After all, he noted, the penalty is just $95. How much could that possibly matter?

This is a common bit of confusion. The individual mandate's penalty is not $95 in year one. It's $95 or 1 percent of your taxable income, whichever is greater. So if you make $80,000 in taxable income, the penalty is $800.

What constitutional right does the Government have to do this? You may say that we are forced to do things everyday. Like we are forced to eat (which is false,) We are forced to follow laws, we are forced to do this, we are forced to do that. But let's stop jumping at straws here and aim at the facts, let's go over why Obamacare is bad ppolicy.

President Obama’s economic advisers originally had calculated that the bill would reduce health-care spending by $200 billion a year, from whence the president derived his intellectually indefensible conclusion that the bill would save the average family of four some $2,500 a year. Recently, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services calculated that ACA will not reduce health-care spending at all and will instead add about $70 billion per year in the immediate future. Estimates of the program’s expense keep growing. It will spend more than originally estimated, it will tax more than originally estimated, and its vaunted deficit-reduction benefits have been evaporating at a pace suggesting that, as many predicted, they will never come to pass. In 2010, CBO projected that ACA would reduce the deficit by $140 billion through 2019; today that projection is a mere $4 billion. Connect the dots.

The estimated tax increases in the bill have doubled. That rising price tag means higher costs for consumers as well as taxpayers: The average 27-year-old man buying health insurance on the ACA exchanges can expect to pay almost double what he had been paying before; the average woman of the same age, 62 percent more.

Let's get into the nitty gritty.

Premium Increases on Working and Middle Class

President Obama hosted a Rose Garden event Monday where he incessantly repeated a talking point about health care now being more affordable. Certainly, for some, it will be, especially those joining the expanded Medicaid rolls.

But for many more millions among the working and middle class, premiums are going up, sometimes by as much as 50% to 150%. We are not talking about taxing the wealthy here, we are talking about everyday people, families, and small businesses.

Millions are about to have their standard of living hit and their ability to save for college and retirement undermined -- mostly because the government is forcing them to give up a health care premium they were happy with, and purchase another loaded with services they neither need nor want.

Keep in mind that all of this is happening to these families in a no-growth economy.

Source:

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/kevinglass/2013/10/17/study-obamacare-results-in-premium-increase-in-45-states-n1726211

As I said, in MY STATE, 50.7% increase in premiums for 27 and 50 year olds. This is disastourus, completely. Now, you liberals will say "YOU'VE BEEN LISTENING TO ALEX JONES, RUSH LIMBAUGH, SEAN HANNITY"...

Know what? You have all been listening to Martin Bashir, Chris Matthews and Ed Shultz, when you probably haven't. I also have a question: Why do businesses get a 1 year exemption, yet, citizens don't? Why do Politicians have their own private healthcare, including Obama, and are exempt to Obamacare? If it's so great, why not experience it for yourselves?

This is dreadfully bad policy, I know people who are suffering from this and suffering terribly. It should be REPEALED.

Avatar image for dernman
dernman

36141

Forum Posts

10092

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

#604  Edited By dernman

I always find it funny when one side of the spectrum points the finger and calls the other side something like hypocrites as if they aren't just the other side of the coin.

Reason someone from any particular side refuses to see it is because they agree with their side.

Avatar image for willpayton
willpayton

22502

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Plus, people like you, the young and healthy (assuming you're healthy) will have to pay for someone else's health insurance. Do you really want to do that? Secondly, individuals are now REQUIRED by law to buy health insurance. What if they don't need it? What if they're healthy? Oh, and there's a penalty.

What if they dont need health insurance? Who is it you think doesnt need health insurance? There's only one type of person who doesnt need it... those who are extremely wealthy. Are you talking about them? Do you actually think that rich people dont have or need health insurance? Who do you think pays for the medical care of uninsured people when they need to go to the Emergency Room? Who do you think pays for the medical treatment for such people of un-diagnosed conditions that could have been spotted through preventive care if a person had insurance?

This is a common bit of confusion. The individual mandate's penalty is not $95 in year one. It's $95 or 1 percent of your taxable income, whichever is greater. So if you make $80,000 in taxable income, the penalty is $800.

So, you're saying that paying $800 a year is too much for a person who makes $80,000/year? Or, are you saying that such a person doesnt need health insurance? Also, how many people who make $80,000/year do so without a job that provides health insurance? I'm curious who these people are.

What constitutional right does the Government have to do this?

Are you really asking this, or repeating what you heard? Do you actually not know that the Supreme Court already ruled that the ACA is Constitutional, or do you just not care? And, if you dont care, what makes you more qualified than the Supreme Court to decide what is or is not Constitutional?

Let's get into the nitty gritty.

But for many more millions among the working and middle class, premiums are going up, sometimes by as much as 50% to 150%. We are not talking about taxing the wealthy here, we are talking about everyday people, families, and small businesses.

Source:

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/kevinglass/2013/10/17/study-obamacare-results-in-premium-increase-in-45-states-n1726211

As I said, in MY STATE, 50.7% increase in premiums for 27 and 50 year olds. This is disastourus, completely. Now, you liberals will say "YOU'VE BEEN LISTENING TO ALEX JONES, RUSH LIMBAUGH, SEAN HANNITY"...

Do you have a study that wasnt done by the Heritage Foundation, a right-wing organization? Also, the sheer irony of this is amazing... considering Obamacare is based on their own original proposal.

Know what? You have all been listening to Martin Bashir, Chris Matthews and Ed Shultz, when you probably haven't. I also have a question: Why do businesses get a 1 year exemption, yet, citizens don't? Why do Politicians have their own private healthcare, including Obama, and are exempt to Obamacare? If it's so great, why not experience it for yourselves?

Do you actually want to know why the individual mandate doesnt get an exemption, or do you just want to keep repeating things you heard before?

This is dreadfully bad policy, I know people who are suffering from this and suffering terribly. It should be REPEALED.

How exactly are people suffering from Obamacare?

Avatar image for vaeternus
Vaeternus

9558

Forum Posts

3

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#606  Edited By Vaeternus

@kingjohnrocks:

@dernman said: I always find it funny when one side of the spectrum points the finger and calls the other side something like hypocrites as if they aren't just the other side of the coin.

Reason someone from any particular side refuses to see it is because they agree with their side.

Exactly, this guy is off his horse if hes judging someone cause i dont drive? That doesnt even make sense lol

@ drill, Clearly, youre getting desperate pulling out the 'hypocrite' card when there.is non, for posting facts about nyc and the mta that youre clearly unaware of.

Yes, wow indeed was my reaction after reading your previous post. And you have the ability to disarm common knowledge apparently....I bet you don't even in a City like NY(as I do) for you to make such off statements. BTW, good job making more false assumptions thinking I "watch Fox" you know who thinks that? MSNBC lovers or Fox haters, I've seen all of them in the past and choose not to watch any of them, thus why my links 99% of the time are from unbiased, various sources via the internet and not rant on because "just Fox or MSNBC said this or that" like you people do half the time. Just because you see me defending Fox or saying "Fox is the only major network NOT liberal" doesn't mean I watch it, I just know the facts. MSNBC, CBS, ABC, CNN etc are all liberal or sway liberal as oppose to Fox. So therefore I must be a "Fox fan" right?

Secondly, Just because I live in a liberal city means little, what you fail to realize is while that's true I happen to live in the most conservative part so right there your theory fails. My point is I call it how I see it and you guy are way off with your "socialist transportation" statements. I don't even know where to begin with that, ok so do you live in Dallas? If not then how would you know? Why don't you do something about it and write to your local politicians instead of waste time ranting about it on a comic book forum?

And your whole "PT causes more homeless people" makes no sense, uh no! Lack of jobs, lazyness and motivation causes homeless people. Seriously, ask yourself what majority of homeless people can actually BETTER their lives if given the chance? Do you know EVERY single homeless person on Earth? Because I know for a fact half the people I've met in my life homeless were drunks walking up to me begging for money most likely to buy more booze(yeah, I'm so sure Public Transportation and republicans caused that too) right? lol

Sorry, but all I see is typical liberal hypocrisy and going off topic such as your "public transportation causes homeless people" what?! lol Now I know what @ cuddlebear and @ kingjohnrocks meant with the liberal logic. First person ever in the world to make such a crazy connection and I've heard some doozies...what's next? Republicans caused Climate change and Global warming? Tell me another. :)

I already posted a link a few of them in fact in here showing how Romneycare and Obamacare are different overall.

I do choose to live every day, but your analogy makes no sense given the fact that uhh THAT'S LIFE?? lol I mean what do you want everything for free? Everything easy? Don't we all wish that. I mean I know you're a liberal but come on dude...one reason why I still don't have a car is because unlike most out where I live, my mommy and daddy didn't spoil the hell out of me & the other reason being my choice between gas prices, insurance, all the nick nacks to worry about, inspecting etc I don't need one at this point in my life. At first I admit I didn't get it, seeing all my friends get new cars, used cars just A car to help them out from their folks right out of H.S. but not me.

Now, however I'm thankful for it because I realize the lesson is "you must WORK for rewards in life" period. And the fact that people like you can't see how Obamacare is not a good thing because for one, it's flawed, two causing people to lose jobs, drop insurances and three coming out OTHER'S wallets...I understand ACD aka Obamacare full well, what you're missing is the flaws/bad elements within it. Sure, people hear "owe free healthcare" but at WHAT cost? As I said earlier pages ago "I prefer quality over quantity" The car insurance gig, that's required for anyone, anywhere if you own a car this is why given where I live I don't care as much because I have other options such as walking, scooting, biking, PT hell even longboarding(though that's not really practical given my age and there are faster methods) but point is I enjoy not driving in a way because of reasons you said, congested streets(and no place is as congested as Manhattan during rush hour) accidents causing people to slow down to look, I can go on. In that time I could do 10+ blocks on a bike, scooter in far less time by the time I get where I need to be by car...or even walking in some cases(it'll just take slightly longer)

Avatar image for diredrill
DireDrill

2483

Forum Posts

26

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#607  Edited By DireDrill

@dernman: All in all, I would like universal health care but that won't happen in America so this compromise is something I find reasonable.

@vaeternus: Hypocrisy is decrying one thing and then using it. You decry socialism and yet use socialized transportation. I think that makes you a hypocrite as much as Romney was for decrying welfare yet being a product of welfare.

You must not have seen Talladega Nights, if you had you would know that all real Americans are drivers. Only panzy liberals use public transportation or get their salsa from New York City.

I love how you become a shrinking violet when you start looking like a fool. Still waiting on those citations.

@kingjohnrocks: I am assuming you are a responsible person and were insured before the ACA went into effect? Assuming this is true, how much were you paying before the ACA and how much were you paying after the ACA? If your amount was not exactly 50% more than its previous amount, you are lying. Please tell us what state you live in so we can verify this information.

Do you think that the ACA forces you to give up your current insurance? It doesn't, you still keep any insurance you had beforehand. If you have insurance through your employer, you can keep it. Obama and Congress all have insurance through their employer. Switching would cost the taxpayers more money as dealing with insurance companies can be quite the hassle. They aren't exempt from the ACA they already have health care insurance. Businesses get a 1 year exemption because they don't get the same tax credits that citizens do, this was explained.

Given that Hospitals already price things knowing that people won't pay, I have already been forced to pay for someone else's heath care. How is this any different? People have been paying for other people's health care for decades without knowing it. The ACA seeks to redress this issue.

Let me ask you something, do you drive?

Avatar image for willpayton
willpayton

22502

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Given that Hospitals already price things knowing that people won't pay, I have already been forced to pay for someone else's heath care. How is this any different? People have been paying for other people's health care for decades without knowing it. The ACA seeks to redress this issue.

Exactly. People that complain about not wanting to pay for other's health care dont realize (or conveniently ignore) that we have always paid for health care for those who need it through the ER and "free" clinics in the form of taxes and higher rates for the insured. Who paid for all those super-expensive ER visits for the uninsured with medical conditions that could have easily (and cheaply) been treated years earlier? The answer is: everyone, in one way or another.

Why continue with the worst possible, most expensive, and least effective method of providing universal healthcare, when we can have an intelligent and efficient system instead? A system where people can be healthier and less worried about dying of undiagnosed diseases or going bankrupt because of a random accident or illness?

This is about being compassionate, yes, but also about being fiscally smart and responsible. But, hey, who cares about those things when you can call Obama a Muslim and shut down the government in order to try and destroy Obamacare, just so you can win your Congressional election next year?

Avatar image for vaeternus
Vaeternus

9558

Forum Posts

3

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#609  Edited By Vaeternus

@ drill, yes, and I dpnt support obamacare that has nothing to do with pt, thus there is no hypocrisy, youre out in leftfield by comparing the two.

So in other words youre going based on a 'movie'? Lol smh..you know movies are fictional right? Not real.

As for 'only liberal pansies use public transportation'

Ok, so in other words youre a liberal and just called yourself a pansy?

Second, hardly. People in nyc of all nationalities, wealth or not, genders, religions and political beliefs ride public transportation. And pt has nothing to do with socialism, as its.a necessity in crowded cities and not everyone drives guy. You really should stop watching what 'movies' tell you and accept reality.

Avatar image for diredrill
DireDrill

2483

Forum Posts

26

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#610  Edited By DireDrill

@vaeternus:

Can you not hit the reply button? It is right next to the quote button I see you using so often. Click it and it types out my full name and sends me a notification that you have replied to my comment. It is quite a courteous thing to do and since you have 5000 posts you should know that.

Why is it that you suck so badly at discerning satire? Hold on, do you believe that Stephen Colbert is a Republican? Are you really that gullible? Movies that are satire specifically take things that are true about something and make them funny. Given that many Republican and Tea Party Voters are also big Nascar fans, it is not even a stretch to make the suggestions that I have made. Maybe you should read up more on your party so that you can understand just who it is you are supporting because you seem completely unaware.

By the way, New York is the only city in America that has high public transportation use every other city pales in comparison. It is interesting that New York is also such a liberal city. Public Transportation is not a necessity, it is a good idea that certainly doesn't hurt things but by no means is Public Transportation a requirement.

I do like how you continue to hide your shame by using the abbreviation PT. It further supports my claim.

Avatar image for vaeternus
Vaeternus

9558

Forum Posts

3

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#612  Edited By Vaeternus

@diredrill: Sure I can, but when I'm on my droid it doesn't register the same way as it does on my PC for whatever reason *shrugs*(it also doesn't allow me to quote on it) but anyway, on my PC now. But yes I'm well aware of it, there's three ways to address someone the quote, the reply or using the @ username etc. But again, I don't always respond on my PC so....

@dernman Exactly, who judges someone or pull the hypocrite card because i dont drive? That doesnt even make sense lol

@ drill, Clearly, youre getting desperate pulling out the 'hypocrite' card when there.is non, for posting facts about nyc and the mta that youre clearly unaware of.

Yes, wow indeed was my reaction after reading your previous post. And you have the ability to disarm common knowledge apparently....I bet you don't even in a City like NY(as I do) for you to make such off statements. BTW, good job making more false assumptions thinking I "watch Fox" you know who thinks that? MSNBC lovers or Fox haters, I've seen all of them in the past and choose not to watch any of them, thus why my links 99% of the time are from unbiased, various sources via the internet and not rant on because "just Fox or MSNBC said this or that" like you people do half the time. Just because you see me defending Fox or saying "Fox is the only major network NOT liberal" doesn't mean I watch it, I just know the facts. MSNBC, CBS, ABC, CNN etc are all liberal or sway liberal as oppose to Fox. So therefore I must be a "Fox fan" right?

Secondly, Just because I live in a liberal city means little, what you fail to realize is while that's true I happen to live in the most conservative part so right there your theory fails. My point is I call it how I see it and you guy are way off with your "socialist transportation" statements. I don't even know where to begin with that, ok so do you live in Dallas? If not then how would you know? Why don't you do something about it and write to your local politicians instead of waste time ranting about it on a comic book forum?

And your whole "PT causes more homeless people" makes no sense, uh no! Lack of jobs, lazyness and motivation causes homeless people. Seriously, ask yourself what majority of homeless people can actually BETTER their lives if given the chance? Do you know EVERY single homeless person on Earth? Because I know for a fact half the people I've met in my life homeless were drunks walking up to me begging for money most likely to buy more booze(yeah, I'm so sure Public Transportation and republicans caused that too) right? lol

Sorry, but all I see is typical liberal hypocrisy and going off topic such as your "public transportation causes homeless people" what?! lol Now I know what @ cuddlebear and @ kingjohnrocks meant with the liberal logic. First person ever in the world to make such a crazy connection and I've heard some doozies...what's next? Republicans caused Climate change and Global warming? Tell me another. :)

I already posted a link a few of them in fact in here showing how Romneycare and Obamacare are different overall.

I do choose to live every day, but your analogy makes no sense given the fact that uhh THAT'S LIFE?? lol I mean what do you want everything for free? Everything easy? Don't we all wish that. I mean I know you're a liberal but come on dude...one reason why I still don't have a car is because unlike most out where I live, my mommy and daddy didn't spoil the hell out of me & the other reason being my choice between gas prices, insurance, all the nick nacks to worry about, inspecting etc I don't need one at this point in my life. At first I admit I didn't get it, seeing all my friends get new cars, used cars just A car to help them out from their folks right out of H.S. but not me.

Now, however I'm thankful for it because I realize the lesson is "you must WORK for rewards in life" period. And the fact that people like you can't see how Obamacare is not a good thing because for one, it's flawed, two causing people to lose jobs, drop insurances and three coming out OTHER'S wallets...I understand ACD aka Obamacare full well, what you're missing is the flaws/bad elements within it. Sure, people hear "owe free healthcare" but at WHAT cost? As I said earlier pages ago "I prefer quality over quantity" The car insurance gig, that's required for anyone, anywhere if you own a car this is why given where I live I don't care as much because I have other options such as walking, scooting, biking, PT hell even longboarding(though that's not really practical given my age and there are faster methods) but point is I enjoy not driving in a way because of reasons you said, congested streets(and no place is as congested as Manhattan during rush hour) accidents causing people to slow down to look, I can go on. In that time I could do 10+ blocks on a bike, scooter in far less time by the time I get where I need to be by car...or even walking in some cases(it'll just take slightly longer)

Avatar image for diredrill
DireDrill

2483

Forum Posts

26

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@vaeternus: Why did you delete your previous post?

Avatar image for vaeternus
Vaeternus

9558

Forum Posts

3

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I tried to edit it with my android and apparently it reloads the page after a certain amount of time, I hit delete by mistake