@squaresIt looks bad, government augmenting things people are born with against their freewill. In a world where homeless people are basically looked at as if they're part of the street, and people see them as something they'd never fell into. When obviously a flash flood, an earthquake, a fire can take away everything they owned and pit them in the same situation, being homeless.
But I also would admit, for a human to be naturally happy, some things they would have to put to the corner of their mind. To really always be aware of how the good things in life could go away, like really appreciate it, sort of makes a bitter person I guess?
Either it makes a Scrooge or a charitable person, probably one of those. My argument is really falling apart before it started..
So the argument I was trying to make is that human brain is built to collect more information to their sights than to their other senses, so it's difficult for us to look pass certain things and see what it really is.
Anyway, I think just something that looks bad doesn't mean it is bad, there's no argument that letting bad people have children's consequences are more horrendous than doping them up and giving them a vasectomy against their freewill.
Log in to comment