Stop this, you run out of arguments, you did with me and used the whole engrish argument, that is a way to sound like if you "win", but actually is used when a person run out of arguments and need to say something, so they keep going until the other guy quits.
what the hell are you even talking about at this point? I've had arguments this entire time,m your just ignoring them
Here you are using the keep replying until the other guy quits, so it means you "win", since the other guy quits.
I'm going to keep replying until you have an actual reason
I am using the no reply technique, when some on run out of arguments and you dont reply to him, but post a strong argument against everything the other guy said, since it look that is not related the other guy is not going to reply since he "won", because the other person "quit".
seriously, why do you think I've run out of arguments?
also, you haven't posted any strong arguments (seriously, would you be okay is dsmeone refused to heal your loved ones?)
I have been online to have seen this things to death.
I...what does this statement mean?
Stop this, you run out of arguments, you did with me and used the whole engrish argument, that is a way to sound like if
Death is the permanent cessation of all biological functions that sustain a particular living organism. Phenomena which commonly bring about death include biological aging(senescence), predation, malnutrition, disease, suicide, murder and accidents or trauma resulting in terminal injury.Bodies of living organisms begin to decompose shortly after death. The death of an organism also results in a permanent absence of consciousness.
yeah, I know what death means
There is nothing natural to undo those things, when some one died because the circle of life had get to his end and there wasnt anything unnatural about it, when Q kills them, there is something unnatural about it, since he alter reallity to do this.
there's nothing natural to move faster than light either
hey, you know what's natural? cancer.
you know what's unnatural? chemotherapy
and there's nothing natural to light dark crevices, so does that mean fire is a corruption of teh circle of life that should not be used because people didn't invent it?
seriously, the "natural" argument doesn't make any sense
Also this whole argument is based on death is bad and evil, no one actually hates death, they hate life for the way it is, they want life to be the way they belive it should be, so its not going to stop at this, it will keep until you have take out everything to mankind, the good things in life are in there because of the bad thing, without the bad thing there is no good things.
so genocide is good becasue it accentuates everything good that happens?
I mean, if people didn't hate death, I don't think medicine would exist, or murder would be a crime
People will stop having a reason to do things, to get better and having free will, since an unnatural force would at the end take all the decisions.
the same thing could be said about replicators
Thir unnatural and make scarcity stop existing, but you (and Picard) seem to accept those with no real problem
and for people stopping doing stuff...I don't think that would happen. I think immortal people would be motivated to do a lot more stuff becasue of their boredom and lack of fear, and you really supplied no reason that immortals would do nothing