Can someone answer a question for me: I was just dueling someone who played the Spell Card "Multiply" but they tried to argue that they could use it multiple times, even after the turn they had played it was over. I thought they were wrong as I couldn't find anything that stated the card had such an ability and thought it only worked for that one turn and that one turn only, after that they could not continue making extra tokens. Were they wrong or am I misunderstanding how the Spell works?
Can someone answer a question for me: I was just dueling someone who played the Spell Card "Multiply" but they tried to argue that they could use it multiple times, even after the turn they had played it was over. I thought they were wrong as I couldn't find anything that stated the card had such an ability and thought it only worked for that one turn and that one turn only, after that they could not continue making extra tokens. Were they wrong or am I misunderstanding how the Spell works?
lol You can not use that card more then once. It's not a continues spell card, the person you were dueling against was either cheating or had no idea what he was talking about.
Can someone answer a question for me: I was just dueling someone who played the Spell Card "Multiply" but they tried to argue that they could use it multiple times, even after the turn they had played it was over. I thought they were wrong as I couldn't find anything that stated the card had such an ability and thought it only worked for that one turn and that one turn only, after that they could not continue making extra tokens. Were they wrong or am I misunderstanding how the Spell works?
lol You can not use that card more then once. It's not a continues spell card, the person you were dueling against was either cheating or had no idea what he was talking about.
That's what I thought and tried to explain to them, but they claimed that it could because the spell says "Special Summon as many tokens as possible" but I knew it wasn't continuous. Like I literally destroyed one token and then they placed ANOTHER token, it was complete bull. lol
@fadetoblackbolt: I haven't played since 9th grade which was a couple years ago. I sold my dragon deck which was based on pure fusion cards (blue eyes ultimate, King Dragun, Red Eyes Skull Dragon, to name a few). And I'm actually trying to make a good Dark Magician/Toon deck. I just really don't understand how building one works, my sisters bf made my decks, so any help is appreciated!
Does anybody recall Vennominaga the Deity of Poisonous Snakes? I'm only bringing it up because it appears to be long forgotten......
Its not too bad, being the only monster card with blanket (absolute) immunity to card effects, plus a revive. The problem is that decks revolving around it aren't that great overall.
I will always love the first series Yu-gi-oh!, but I do love the decks that are out now. I plays some of the old Nintendo DS games and use the Six Samurai, E-Heroes- and sometimes the Guardians.
@the_legendary_supersaiyan_hulk: I know she's difficult to summon and her weird instant win condition getting reset on her revives makes it worse, but I was just wondering if people remembered her.
@thefirstlantern: I'm not the best deckbuilder myself, but the better methods I've found is working off this kind of basis;
Draw - Can you get more cards in your hand than just the one per turn? Draw power is the most important aspect of making a deck. If you can't draw the cards you need, you can't win.
Damage - What's going to hurt your opponent and take out their life points? Or do you plan to have them deck out? How do you intend to win? If your winning strategy is based only on "I hope to get X card out and then hammer them over a few turns", then you'll probably be in trouble. Work out how you're going to hurt your opponent, and how you're going to stop them from hurting you.
Consistency - Having a lot of powerful combos is great, but if the chances of pulling them off are slim to none, then they might as well not be in the deck. Cards like the Sacred Beasts for example are extremely powerful, but also highly improbable to play. The best way, in my opinion, to judge consistency is to have practice draws of of 5+1 (for draw phase). If you can make a decent play every time you draw, then your deck is looking good. If you keep drawing dead hands, then your deck needs work.
Back Row (Spell and Trap) - Do you want to focus on buffing your monsters, or controlling what you're opponent can and can't do? Do you want to freeze out their back row, or protect your own? It's important to settle on a solid back row that has purpose, rather than just throwing together seemingly good cards (though there are a few staple cards, like Heavy Storm).
@the_legendary_supersaiyan_hulk: fencing fire ferrit is the new snowman eater. I tested him yesterday and the little guy works so good. For him to kill Opion I'm keeping him teched in my deck.
@humanrocket: Lol, Fencing Fire Ferrit is silly. It's only decent when playing low-mid-tier. A lot of decks just look at 'destruction' and say "Lol no."
@the_legendary_supersaiyan_hulk: 500 burn for the win is still pretty funny though (; also like that it reminds me of the fire ferrits form legend of Kora XD
Warlock kicked my butt pretty good, I am rusty, plus DN runs stuff manually so I forget to do things lol. But it's fun I have to construct some better decks.
Log in to comment