I see I have attracted some criticism for referring to the US military as a collection of knuckle dragging borderline pyschopaths with an inveterate taste for blood- I was simply repeating a Vietnam era trope- which I noted got me kicked off a Catholic website.
Whilst I reserve the right to be as critical of the armed forces of either country( esp when they engage in conduct expressly condemned by the UK or US governments or the Geneva Convention- such as the murder of POWs for which a Royal Marines sergeant was recently convicted by a court martial), I should point out that I am no pacifist-painful though it may be at times war is necessary(pace WWII). It seems to me that for differing reasons, both Right and Left make the same mistake with the military- the former uncritically venerates it as much as the latter equally uncritically demonizes it( presumably the enemy is always presumed to be in the right- be it the PIRA, Taliban, Al Qaeda, Iraqi or Argentinians) and this is WRONG.
No entity in a democratic society is entitled to uncritical "Our Boys can do nothing wrong" virtual veneration any more than equally uncritical demonization.
Contrary to popular superstition, soldiers and other fighting men,esp having seen the horrors of combat, are the usually the most pacific members of society-it is usually the politicians(no names, no pack drill but we all know of whom I allude to) who are the most bloodthirsty. "And therefore the soldier, more than any other persons, prays the most intensely for peace, for it is he(and more recently she) who must suffer and bear the deepest marks and scars of war!", the late General Douglas McArthur is supposed to have said- and "Dugout Doug"(as he was irreverently known by his subordinates during WWII) is surely right on this matter.
Anybody think as I do?
Terry
Log in to comment