Slavery is a bigger issue today than anytime in the past, its basically just a numbers and ignorance thing otherwise. Beating a black guy in a video game and saying I owned you could imply a negative racial stereotype, it could imply a joke about slavery, it could imply a malicious racist attitude it could imply an innocent turn of phrase, it could imply trash talk it could imply more than one thing it could imply a lot. It depends. It depends on how a person understands and knows and how a person means and intends. A white guy in Harlem wearing a white board with derogatory racial slurs towards black people could imply a crazy racist guy or it could imply a New York cop having a bad day. Telling a white guy you owned him also works in a similar way given that slaves come in all colors and genders, today and throughout history.
Its the funny thing about subjective language, it depends. Like I personally only use the word owned in an ironic joking sense, because I think its a bit of a silly term and its usually used to exaggerate a persons assertion. Whole competitive thing again combined with emotional and psychological validation. Ever spend time in situations where you have to prioritize accuracy over feelings and subjective terms become useless. Take good science for example, its not about opinions, right or wrong, owning or assumptions or faulty human senses that empower assumptions, using subjective terms leads to inaccurate and faulty conclusions, results, explanatory and predictive power. If you want actual change and actual results and actual solutions and the services, facilities, politicians, people and society we deserve, one has to smarten up about how words work, how other people work without dismissing those things because one wants to feel good about their accusations. If you have ever had an in joke with a friend that could be misconstrued by someone? Welcome to the club. If you have ever said something that sounded way more funny in your head but lame when you said it aloud? Welcome to the club? If you have ever seen someone say something so ignorant you eyebrows raised ala the Rock and your first instinct was to tear into them welcome to the club. Now if you have ever seen a tangled mess of complicated people and societal problems and you wanted actual solutions and figured you had to think about things a bit then actually doing somethings then welcome to the club, but a much more exclusive club not because of restrictions, but because most people don't really want to join this club, not really. Expressing opinions (random arguments and super certain assertions included) is too easy and there is not enough incentive to actually try and do more.
I wish each time a person was raped the media and people rushed in to provide similar conversation and effort in helping them and not just rape victims but victims of similar situations and not just the reaction but the active and proactive steps and measures preventing and ensuring that such crimes stop occurring. Conversation is good but people get tired and a lot of people only feel so strongly about this for a few hours before they stop caring until the media flares up with another story to make people feel good about their superior arguments and opinions and all that. Think more and think more strongly and try and do more stuff relating to thinks you think strongly about.
On the one hand,I agree with this,on the other hand,I agree with the article that lykopsis showed.
I am truly torn on this,on the one hand I think that (btw,that is funny that no one actually asked him...I never really thought of that):
- It WAS a rape joke (but in this case I don't think he meant it,but it was still a rape joke in gaming culture nonetheless).
I think that it potentially was a rape joke (but he didn't mean it as such),but since rape jokes are kinda common in gaming culture,he didn't actually mean for it to be a rape joke.So it was a rape reference,but he didn't intend for it to be.But it still was,nonetheless.(Gah,I am going in circles,you know what I mean).Here are the points (this might be simpler):
- He didn't intend for it to be a rape joke
- But even though he didn't intend for it to be so,he still said a rape reference (and he didn't have rape in mind because of its common usage in gaming culture).
He simply said it only in the context for her to just let his inevitable victory happen.He didn't say it in the context of "I am beating you" in a way to mirror rape,but more in the sense for her to just stop trying because he is going to win shortly....ugh,you know what I mean!!
I really am torn on this.I mean,he most likely didn't intend to mean that,but at the same time it was still a rape reference.But again,perhaps he just said it in a way that wasn't mirroring rape (the way it is used in common gaming culture)...but just in the context of "my victory is inevitable".
But I hate to paint gamers with this stereotypical brush because,just because a lot of gamers use this,doesn't mean that the majority use it on average.I mean,I know many gamers that use this term loosely (and again,without actually intending for the meaning of rape,but having it as a rape reference as in mirroring rape,nonetheless),yet I know many that don't use this term.So I am not going to stereotype gamers,although I know many of them do use this term.
Heh heh I can be longwinded ^_^
Thanks and I enjoyed your reply.
To me if people define things based on perceptions and opinions alone? Then everyone in the world is a rapist. Why not? People with certain neurological disorders can often say offensive things but when people are aware of this they usually understand and are okay with verbal tics that could otherwise be considered offensive. If you teach a small child to say certain words that are considered inappropriate society will usually identify the person who taught the child the word in the wrong rather than the child because the child didn't really mean or understand it. The person attempting to make the joke probably didn't mean to cause this uproar nor understand that it would happen. I even say attempted the joke because technically speaking the definition of a joke can mean "a thing that someone says to cause amusement or laughter" but I didn't laugh. Then again some people did. So is it a joke or not? Well in the context of me and them it was an attempted joke most likely but for a person that laughed it was a joke. Its almost as if things can be more than one thing heh heh. Which is the point, if 80 people out of 100 people don't laugh is it still a joke? Sure depending on how you define a joke and understanding and knowing language and the intents of a person as well as reaction. Like if the person didn't intend to cause amusement or laughter but amusement or laughter did occur that would be unintentional humor and not a joke.
Flipping things around now because you can discuss a similar thing as far as the context and meaning of rape joke. Given what I perceive as a difference in humor between me and the person who attempted to make the joke i could assume that they probably don't know about about rape, or terms rapists use during rape or how triggering works but thats just me assuming. For all I know this person may have spent more time doing good for rape victims than everyone in this thread combined and really sensitive to the issue and feeling absolutely horrible that in the comfort of a friends presence (and microphones and hundreds of people) something he said got misconstrued to sounded offensive. I don't know and I am okay with saying I don't know and because I don't know I won't claim to know or use words that appeal and rely on a false sense of security to paint myself in any sense that the luxury of certainty can afford.
So in that sense I can't in good conscious call it a rape joke in an objective sincere sense, only in a sense I know that people can and do assume and infer a lot instead of critically questioning themselves and well yeah again asking the person what they meant. How is Microsoft relevant here for example? If this happened at a smaller company's demo news and media probably wouldn't be all over this but the fact its high profile helps "sell this story" and that story invokes strong reactions from people but not always strong thinking.
Rape jokes are common in gaming and a lot of places I agree, and its because some people are okay with taking ownership in rape jokes and all other manner of offensive jokes and thats usually the best way to sincerely recognize a jokes theme as in when a person clarifies that that is what they meant. I know people who have been raped who make rape jokes because to them its a way of empowerment and a sign that they won't let peoples perceptions affect what they know and intend but I also know people who have been raped who get anxious and nervous when people talk about sex or violence or just small things and they get fearful and nervous and uncomfortable and they are still trying their best to learn how to cope and not be so sensitive and those very different approaches are okay and fine and just one way people differ in attitudes and approaches to life. Also a reason why people shouldn't try to overgeneralize when speaking on behalf of groups and why intent and actions should be the priority of an individuals perception and sense of others.
I think I understand what you are saying - that there is what he intended to say, what we know of gaming culture and how people understand and know things and those can all be valid as far as perceptions so we are in a situation where its fair to apply multiple meanings to a sentiment/action/articulated joke? I agree and I think in one way its good you are torn, because its a clash of ideas and thoughts as far as how we interact with each other and everyone either day right? Assuming is necessarily part of life and we all want to be represented accurately and not falsely. ^_^
Some comedians use very sensitive and offensive materials in their routines, many are actually intelligent enough, funny enough and popular enough to A. Be funny and C. Make some people actually think about certain concepts as they relate to ourselves and our ideas about the world. A lot of your average gamers or comic fans can't do that as well and so the attempted joke has no redeeming value in the eyes of many. Not only that many retired comedians have often criticized how many audiences never really got some of their more offensive jokes and how they regretted them. It can definitely lead to situations where people hear something they think is funny and try to reproduce it without being funny and or as deep as say as a comedians delivery on the same subject matter. So to me its not really about rape. Its about intelligence and reason and understanding. If I am okay with people who have been raped telling jokes about rape because it helps them I am okay with people joking about rape. That being said I prefer that all people in general try to be reasonable, try to be intelligent, try to be compassionate and understanding and empathetic and patience because while the chances of a rape joke or a racist joke or a sexist joke are likely to have a higher chance of offending people? A creative person can make jokes about anything offensive and some people will be offended at anything. So when we exist in a situation where people will try to be offensive about everything and some people will be offended by anything, intent actually matters a lot. Thats my main criticism of that earlier link, it had too many fallacious arguments mixed amongst its very sound valid and credible well articulated arguments. So I think its a great piece as far as illustrating to someone who disagrees with its premise why many are up in arms about this, but it doesn't really do a good job explaining why people react to such things differently and how to overcome those differences for the positive benefits of everyone. In that sense I think you did a better job, because you are aware of the cultural problem that exists but you know not to stereotype people because of it.
Log in to comment